Are we all quanta?

Dude reader has kindly fed me with the word "quantum computer".

Well, it's not new, perhaps the Tavistock Institute has even a prototype of it, although it spits out not in Swiss precision, but at least now and then, a black magic useful word, Dude just reported on a Nichtmalrüge out insurance, he'll part, at least here, in future "quantum computer" call (I said, in the face of so high to computing matter the fact that you so save a syllable of the German language thus not necessarily a Tort antäte: see comment string to " libertarians - all just a dreamer? ").

Dude now takes a quantum computer and quantum computing as an apt term for all creation to, so, me, your coffee mug just as well as himself.

A computer is a part that can be expected, as far as I imagines already in my childhood to conceive.

What a quant is so exact, I have not yet understood (see also my written with a hint of mockery as the Selbstbedauerlichkeit considerations for me not accessible definition of a quantum from the above link).

I wonder now ten minutes back and forth (a long quantum time so!), How do I get it into my world view, not supposed to be that of which I always thought that I could be totally discreet and about, but only a Quant in the Great quantum computer.

Am I when the part, like any computer, sometimes crashes, possibly simply rausgequantelt, abgequantelt as simple small quant just forget?

Cloudy, with my ego that I will not only any insignificant Quant. That helps but that is as realistic nothing when it should be just that everyone is just a quant in the Great quantum computer.

Is there perhaps at least special quantum? Can be one of several quanta? Is it possible to disguise his true quantum quantum Nicks name?

If the quantum computer a "memory" function so that he set himself particularly useful in themselves wealthy quantum, crashed, or a normal bug, perhaps remembered an elementary quantum Recovery Program, a quantum "Backup" (ass high), it has a quantum backup?

(That was a little pleonastic, but as one who fears for his quantum existence, they say to each other quantum prefer multiple, what it is ominously.)

What is the quantum computer, if I say to him: "Hello! Can it be !? I'm more than just a quant "-

If the quantum computer so tolerant that it can go through me, or I'll come in quantum confinement, or am I then fast a headless Avatar?

Questions about quantum questions.

Is it possible to be so successful merge with others, also dissatisfied other quanta, which no longer endure also like these quantum forced socialism, that the Great quantum computer must accept at least one of a computationally free or ungequantelte zone?

Mentally, you see it, I put at least quantelig already in the middle of the quantum revolution.

Everyone just one quantum in a giant quantum computer. That violates any quantum law, is a quantum Übele discrimination.

Perhaps each quantum himself should learn computing.

As he did in his underwear stupid movies, the Great quantum computer.

One must not be so stupid as Avatar Jesus do so.

But what if you're only a quant in the Great quantum computer, one should expect to learn as well as the Allquantifikator, the Supreme salvation Avatar?

The quantum is simply not fair.

- Advertisement -

Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages with others.
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Webnews
  • Wikio DE

Tags:

25 Responses to "Are we all quanta?"

  1. Dude says:

    "... Not supposed to be that of which I always thought that I could be totally discreet and about, but only one quantum in the large quantum computer."

    That which you, yes, what makes each individual in the core, is simply not part of the quantum computer, but I call it, the individually unique divine self from you or from each individual. You could also speak of "matter-space-time Wi-conscious-ness".

    And it is precisely this awareness and individual adjustment of the commitments made in the quantum computing individual manifests, according to the cosmic laws, then the material appearance in the material space-time.

    In other words: You're not the quantum or the manifested accumulation of quanta your physicality (s) account, but an eternal divine individual. The quant - as an energy wave / particle - it has infinite potential manifestation. But the awareness and attitudes of individual decides how these quanta are arranged.

    The crucial question is ultimately which one identifies. You have become identified with the glow of solid matter, or with your unconverted, intangible and eternal consciousness in God the Father, Mother, your soul so.

    That's why you're not just an arbitrary quantum or any quantum clusters in an even larger quantum complex.

    Those who identify themselves with the subject, keeps the ego of reality, while ultimately nihiliert's self.

    Your divine self that so what you really matters is the true reality, while the quantum Although feel very real to ultimately "only" are part of the energy structure of the quantum computer, and - as I said, the computer is indeed from the original source self-built;-) - but in reality are not just real.

    That's why I had to comment on symbolization and Tad Williams 'Otherland' is added.

    "If the quantum computer a" Memory "function ..."

    Yes, he did! And these "memory function" is full, and moreover even measurable. May I suggest, for example, Dr. Emoto's observations on the water.
    http://www.wasser-symposium.ch/galerie/emoto.html

    "What makes the quantum computer, if I say to him:" Hello! Can it be !? I'm more than just a quant! ""

    The quantum computer though (at least not in words or text does not speak;-)), but he would speak, he would you confirm this, because of course (see above) are you much more than a quant, and much much more than just an accumulation of quantum!

    The more conscious of his self one is, the freer you will of the mechanisms of the quantum computer, just because you can also exert direct influence on the quantum arrangement by understanding the principle! The statement "matter follows mind" or "the spirit rules matter" is no accident!

    I hope that I could answer some questions.

    Of course, the whole subject is so vast that it is also a 2,000-page tome ultimately not holistically to explain would be able to do.

    Best regards from Dude

  2. Thomas says:

    Ohjeh ... Emoto ...

    There are various theories about the being, the divine and the eternal and the indelible spiritual life. 12dimensionaler room, the first 4 dimensions are the ones we know, then are 4 more then 4 and so divine, the universe and the immortality can be explained by the allegedly even mathematically.
    Since I can not so well with multi-dimensional mathematics, I limit myself to simple logic: If I know all the elementary particles of the universe and its energy state and the direction of movement know, I can predict the future and selbige predict it. It sounds to me so far of all theories most sense, but this means that the future is predetermined, which I personally do not particularly like. But I tend to go there.

  3. Dude says:

    @ Thomas

    I know that there are tons of theories about. Most of them are nonsense, similar to the systems of religion.

    But what do you have against Emoto ?? In addition, it should be and his studies on the water, just one possible example of a variety possible. I could also offer the original word of Dr. Michael King to you as another example.

    "If I know all the elementary particles of the universe and its energy state ..."

    You just do not know. See wave / particle duality and quantum entanglement.

    Incidentally, there is no immortality in quantum computing. But there are eternal conscious being, beyond a timing and material conditionality.

    Everything is a (in Ideallfall: symbiotic) combination of or interaction between the free will of individuals and the collective will of all individuals and by the cosmic laws - or the operating system of the quantum computer, if you will:-) - inherently given, causal, predestined effects.

  4. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    @ Dude

    I picked up just now by one who stands out philosophically closer than I (as he conceives Your concept of the quantum computer, at least in the sense of) also criticism claiming one that I in my criticism towards you (in terms of the concept of the quantum computer linked in the above strand) instead of space and cosmos and God of creation should have spoken.

    He comes from a Creator. (The've us what he prefers to name them creation, you quantum computer set up.)

    Where the former is then probably came from, of course, he could not answer me.

    I think you both (as I said that too him) still, to put it bluntly in one, "Papa" principle are trapped.

    Although you have no evidence for your assertions, but they are well established, calm down, do well.

    This poses obvious benefits; especially in front of others, even at the tip of the spirit; but due to the bare customary law mentally first also, with supposedly five aces in the leaf against unbelieving Thomassen like me who like stop times called Magnus; Unfortunately, I need for you to say, but keeps things then stood no logical examination.

  5. Luke says:

    Without a consistent non-material element can survive no creation theory. Quanta are clearly part of the physical universe. While you can, so to speak act as placement or receiving end, but they are not the All-consciousness, impersonating it, put it in the scene.
    That's about the approach of Arthur M. Young would be summarized in the context.
    (I think Young is as Walter Russell one of the greatest that receive too little attention.)
    The greatest danger, because if one can speak of a danger I see is the quantum phenomena to impute something, so to speak, artificially aufzudonnern. Just as you want to stylize the bescheurte Higgs particles to Gottesteilchen. Teufelsteilchen might be more appropriate if one argues been reversed.
    It could be much more interesting, is simply to ask who and what quantum phenomena serve, so ask to speak technically. We have, for example, for several years clearly verified phenomena such as telepathy and precognition even. These phenomena could use the quantum effects as non-local means of communication policy.
    Sounds like you what Young says the photon. Have something never heard somewhere!

  6. Dude says:

    Magnus

    "Unfortunately, I need for you to say, but keeps things then stood no logical examination."

    Of Course! This goes far beyond intellectual according to logic. It is a consciousness-BE, which determines the symbiotic thinking being.

    I think you understand the intangible Raumzeitlosigkeit not quite, otherwise you could namely the Absolute understand.

    But to really understand the Absolute, it just needs emanating from the relative individual, voluntary interaction with the Absolute.

    And it seems to me that you do not currently canst; probably because of your terrible experiences in the monastery ...: - /

    It follows the unresolved paradox, and thus the lack of understanding.

    Maybe I'll find one day the ideal Policy.

    Luke has been described here's wonderful:

    "Although you can, so to speak act as placement or receiving end, but they are not the All-consciousness, impersonating it, put it in the scene."

    The quantum computer is ultimately "only" the personification of the All-consciousness-being, by taking the relative divine parts (souls) from the intangible, non-polar, absolute Divine (source) into the material, polar quantum computer.

    Here, one finds a pretty good description.
    Dr. Michael King brings the whole thing over pretty good, even if it has some deviations from quantum computing theory.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEOHl2EDgkA

    Lukas

    "Just as you want to stylize the bescheurte Higgs particles to Gottesteilchen. Teufelsteilchen might be more appropriate if one argues been reversed. "

    How true, how true! This Hicks theory belongs to the mind control systems for academic caste ...

    "We have, for example, for several years clearly verified phenomena such as telepathy and precognition even. These phenomena could possibly use the quantum effects as non-local means of communication. "

    To illustrate this, I assume you mean it that way, but it can be misunderstood.

    The phenomena have been around since ancient times, only the verification is rather new, and it is considered verified from official sources, yea far as.
    But there is a system! The vicious adversary of life, in the top of the pyramid, namely know very well how the quantum computer is really set up and working.

    The fact that these quantum effects on cosmic communication based, I assume strong. However, there are still a barrier. The whole hangs in my opinion. almost certainly directly related to the castrated by a 12-helix to a double helix DNA.

    Thank you for the link over there; and not only for the ..:-)

    Best regards from Dude

  7. Dude says:

    Heck, there still lacks an essential part of the sentence!

    "But there is a system! The vicious adversary of life, in the top of the pyramid, know that is very well how the quantum computer is really set up and working, "and of course do in their egocentric malignancy everything that they can their knowledge for their guild lease alone to to possess the power that but the longer, the more crumbling because the Sichwiederbewusstwerdenden piling up.

    Ps. However, I believe that they still take a little longer to reach the critical mass ... ... hopefully not too long ...

  8. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    @ Dude

    I do not think that the people that you see "in the top of the pyramid," have understood much of what you call the quantum computer.

    I have to a very different theory.

    But I also say at once that I will not explain it here (yet).

    Who is reading accurately, perhaps not only learned this comment to think properly, can not find out too much trouble, I strongly suspect, but would only say that if I deem it proper with.

  9. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    @ Dude (Addendum)

    Without, as I said, continue to touch my actual theory here, yet will I explain why those that you, like many others, look at the top of the pyramid, little knowledge of the likely have, or shall we say, only one of my think very limited what you call a quantum computer.

    First, it provides a linguistic error en masse.

    Secondly and thirdly, first see again.

    Your psychology is at a very low level. Even every healthy child recognizes it as sick.

    Their propaganda rebounds already at a network side of a small single fighter from me regularly as helpless.

    This, despite the, usually, should be lightly niedergehatzt because of its Titellosigkeit, his runes, his persistent patriotism, much more insolence, at any time.

    There are just very small people that make up the top of that pyramid.

    As though, would be no wonder you up there to more added fit, must always be smaller.

    None of them will dare to compete to clean conditions alone publicly against me. Probably not even physically (which I refused because I only fight with the weapons of the spirit, if I do not completely anderhin forced).

    As we come to the next.

    You have, like others, far too much respect (in the sense of their abilities), ultimately afraid of those.

    I am already so long as the idiot, have so often been made at all levels, to the fact that I have no fear that could possibly happen to me again.

    If the top of the pyramid people to drum up enough times 333sten Klakeure, again prepare me any sleep sheep so that a temporary defeat, so I know that they needed all that just to get away again.

    Reason good reason to fear that have.

  10. Lisa says:

    Is not that too complicated? Is not it enough to control his own thoughts, for out of them arise from the experience - the whole perception.

    It is "how" asked too much. But that is not important because awareness - or of me from quantum computer - does not respond to the "how", but only on the "what". You just have to know WHAT I want and thoughts so - hence the feelings - to steer in that direction and to keep as clear as possible.

    By the way, my current favorite is the technology of plasma reactor Keshe: http://www.keshefoundation.org/

  11. Luke says:

    Dude
    To illustrate this, I assume you mean it that way, but it can be misunderstood.

    Yes, I mean it that way. Dean Radin is one of the best in the field of meta-by empirical principles. The thing with the so-called paranormal phenomena - the name alone makes paranormal aback - is actually of radical importance, because once they officially come into the collective consciousness, including institutional, all science is upside down. Hardly anything is more stock in this world if we recognize paranormal phenomena as normal phenomena.

    One of the craziest stories of all the paranormal is the cockatoo who has a vocabulary of about 1,000 words and pronounce the thoughts of its owner. What the owners experienced only in anecdotal form (could even be selective perception and interpretation) was verified in clinical trials of the cockatoo. In theory, this would mean that the Kakadu understands the meaning of words and I mean really as the actual LOGOS:
    It's so hard to believe that I'm tempted to ask if the cockatoo is remote controlled.

    Magnus
    the obsession with power, as it is lived by the rulers of this world has an ultimate goal, which is the complete destruction of the ultimate night. Why? Because of this power principle has only made sure of himself, when there is nothing left. Light is preventing this self-assurance. Because light draws.
    In this sense, I am agree with you that they have good reason to be afraid when we "ally" us with the light.
    That is why they try so desperate to prevent people from LIcht. Nevertheless, as long as they have enough people in their power and means to deprive the rest of the not yet subjugated their realization medium body are to treat them in all cases with due Resepkt. Do not underestimate your enemies! Your plan of ultimate destruction, he also has its fulfillment probability.

  12. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    @ Lisa

    I also think it is too complicated.

    But you see - as I said, the one I mentioned above, could also very good friends with the concept of "quantum computer" - that dude even quite well located in this quantized Satire out with his quantum computer in the race; some the concept seems to be taken seriously.

    If I had not guessed, I would not make it any, even if it's the Dude, again taken up for such a reader.

    I will now again a bit mockingly say to you, especially since you could maybe actually be a woman, and not just from Nick ago that this term the intellectual playfulness of mainly men in this tangled nachpostmodernen time very responsive comes.

    Know that there was a machine that expects everything exactly, I like them.

    That of the then even still can quantum of which actually no one else really knows what because that should be for things that makes things even more charming.

    A divine computer, so to speak, maintenance free, and it never crashes.

    This is the dream of not less smaller and somewhat larger boys.

    I do not, although I probably still am a little boy in many ways.

    I need for my worlds just a bog standard Windows computer with network connection, doing me the favor to function normally. And in the head, which is also not bad expects flat. (Sometimes he even sings: Whether the Great quantum computer can also?)

    So only my turnips and a computer, one gets used traditionally for hundreds of Euros, so that I can put my quantum and other stories before mankind.

    LG

  13. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    @ Lisa (Addendum)

    You write:

    'It is "how" asking too much. But that is not important because awareness - or of me from quantum computer - does not respond to the "how", but only on the "what". So you have to know WHAT I want and thoughts - hence the feelings -. To steer in that direction and to keep as clear as possible '

    This objection is very interesting. And I agree with your statement to a considerable extent. But ...

    As a scientist, I must also ask about the how.

    And as an artist, at least to me (my name is not Beuys Kräus) how, that is, the form now truly do not care.

    Finally, if we in this kind of basic categories are already: Are the how and the what ever neatly separated?

    However, I share your criticism of the "How-Lastigkeit" other debaters here. And see it the same way that you especially once virus- its own quantum computer should keep Trojans and worms free (and other riff-raff that there still likes to give it).

    If you still learns diligently, and laughs when the sun does not make the time just for one, the Great quantum computer should have not complaining.

  14. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    @ All

    In a way, we have "created from nothingness something" here together.

    I like that. And quantum default.

    A creator who must have been there out of nowhere somehow, had designed and installed, in which we can then hinquanteln before us Subquantum until we black or pale bald or be a quantum computer: Creation.

    After all, we are capable of thinking up something so illogical.

    This gives hope to the extent that it here and there, maybe even increasingly, also want to work with the logic and cheerfulness.

    (That hope 'is thing, if not the most dangerous at all, but already knew the Ancient Greeks. The remained in Pandora's Büchs' dangerously.)

    So we prefer to call it good courage.

  15. Lisa says:

    "... His own quantum computer virus-, Trojans and worms keep free should"

    Yes, exactly. That and knowing what you want, completely enough. The How then can one see in hindsight and interpret with meaning.

  16. Thomas says:

    @ Dude:
    "'
    Magnus

    "Unfortunately, I need for you to say, but keeps things then stood no logical examination."

    Of Course! This goes far beyond intellectual according to logic out. ""

    If that goes well beyond intellectual proper logic out ... I wonder ... who then all that has come up with? And whether, which the then but could not think ... maybe one or the other stuff has smoked too much, in order to break out of his intellectual contemporary logic can. Perhaps wars just a politician? The are supposed currently tend to use their little minds ...

    We already have problems understanding everyday things such as time, magnetism and gravitation reasonable. And somehow I doubt that we understand these properties in the near future at all. Then start with quantum and so nem stuff that anyway "understand" no one can, and thus establish any strange theories about being me sometimes occurs arg uhupardo.

    That all "natural" about contemporary intellectual logic goes is anything but harmless and has always innocent people in history and still cost the lives. This is one of the reasons why I can not endorse it most of what is on contemporary intellectual logic.

  17. Luke says:

    Magnus
    It seems to me a bit quantized too short, like you because arguments with boys dreams dequantifizierst. Sounds a bit abgequantet.Dass it but rather a Men's topic or male thread, then I can understand. And postmodernism I would now times goose casually considered as the first weapon that has forged from the Heilfbotschaft of Heisenberg.
    Either we are here on this planet equipped with our human mind to understand how the machine works or not. If so, quantum physics, and thus the analogy of the quantum computer is probably a useful tool. Even for amateurs comment.
    Lisa argumentier, seems to me a bit to the effect: practice what works and nobody knows why. Well, practice is very often just something that works, because it is based on a theory puncture resistant, so it knows exactly why it works.
    We must not forget that the science is very late appeared in human Entwikclung. And it could very well have a good reason that it is, first ever surfaced and secondly so late.

  18. J € $ \ / $ says:

    At the level of atoms and including the reality appears opposite to our Alttagserfahrung. Cause and effect are interchangeable, everything is possible Ledegem only with probabilities tangible. A substance itself does not exist, only the interactions can rise to what seems to us up here as world. - And this is the crux of the matter! We are made up of billions of elementary particles, all of which are mutually connected in interaction with each other. The greater the level is, which is considered the less space remains for the (quantum) probability and the absolute crystallizes out than reality. - And yet there are also examples of the quantum nature to find in our world. The state of consciousness of a people to sample changes in the moment when man begins to think about his current state of consciousness - the quantum law that the measurement affects the outcome. Another example is when one tries to silence the voice in your head to silence. An extremely heavy venture, to be honest here. The state of not thinking is similar to the quantum state of the superposition, which contains all possibilities at once. When only the slightest thought arises, this superposition is destroyed, it takes place, so to speak, a measurement and a thought makes its way through the consciousness.

  19. Info liner says:

    I did not at all that my quantum can expect and look from today respectful to the same. They do not stink way.

  20. Lisa says:

    @ Thomas

    "Of Course! This goes far beyond intellectual according to logic. "

    Yes. The logic grows with the insight!

    Magnus Göllerlifte

    Am I out, locked? -)

  21. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    @ Lisa

    Of course you're not locked: to achieve this has still not managed.

    The people here are simply not sufficiently persistent extremely skewed or meaningless wicked for it.

    Only I am persevering extremely weird and pointless maliciously.

    Strange really, I do not even lock me up.

    Can so if you want to think about my above sentence again.

  22. Lisa says:

    Ah that. That with the after-think I can save myself.
    Priorities must be yes.

  23. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    @ Info Liner

    So, if one claims that its quantum not stank, I'm about to suspicious.

    That can only be an alien, or a woman who is lying, of course, as well as aliens tend to do that well known.

    But since you total quantelst, as men are wont to do, you'll be an alien.

    Somewhere behind the Orion system, so I've heard, there should be some pretty intelligent and educated people, the low quantum been 50,000 Earth years everything that comes to them pre Quant.

    They have become Quadrantenquantenzerquantelungssieger several times in this discipline.

    (The prize, which is awarded is more symbolic: you get one seventh Avatar - I do not know why not a Sechstel- or one-eighth Avatar -, pretty painted, salamander-like, black with yellow spots; the eulogy to be held by a QUANTUS Emeritus which, indeed, is added, so my source, abquantelt sometimes a bit too long.)

  24. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    @ Lisa

    You are not as Info liner, obviously an alien, but a woman.

    An alien speaking, have at my record still herumgequantelt, till it - at least apparently - become a Untersubquant.

  25. Dude says:

    Lukas & Jesus

    Thank You!

Leave a Reply