Circumcision of boys: pants down pants up

Now they try extracting foolhardy as it seems, the Knabenverstümmlungsrechtler want to move the thing into the "parental rights", in the blinking of an eye, the Civil Code, there cut away, the criminal justice simply by smuggling.

Idiots. It was expected something like this.

For more information on this fabulous Volte follows.

- Advertisement -

Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web with others.
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Webnews
  • Wikio DE


15 Responses to "circumcision of boys: trousers pants down high"

  1. Lisa says:

    If the law allows parents mutilations, one can write the children also legally do other things, like for example, to make crippled to beg ...

    It's enough, what is usually done to the children in the home and school, namely that you inherited them guilt and debt.

  2. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Lisa

    The procedure of the Ministry of Justice is indeed remarkable: it had now "cornerstones" of the proposed law in federal countries and organizations sent and wants of these (BGH and attorney general) until Monday an answer, because the matter (which may well be those associations?) was so urgent.

    It is therefore also worked with the Überrumpelungseffekt, and all should be complicit in the end, if the targeted Schandgesetz is proposed and adopted.

    The Eckpunktsschwurbelastertum, which you can read via the link below, verschlägt an almost speechless.

    Normally, advises people who tell this kind seriously, sometimes to consult a neurologist.

    And, just as you say (and I here already prophesied): If the parental rights in such a way - now even ... no religious justification, a seemingly brilliant move - is on the child's right to physical integrity, is not long so much honor.

    I have the Schnarri (sorry: Woman Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger) always considered an intelligent woman: that she excels responsible for this mad shit now, is a tragicomic element in the matter.

    "The Schnarrenberger-Verschneidungs-Schändgesetz" or even "the Schnarri-Schändgesetz", so I bename what is likely to come, already.

    As it stands, the mohel will even continue to be allowed to lick the freshly circumcised penises of infants, an act for which it normally does not put little jail.

    Well, still is not Monday.

    It will be interesting, as addressed will respond to the "corners".

    I must also correct or supplement my words: These are not the only idiots that are crazy idiots.

    But idiots are also those who choose the parties that stand for such loopy Deppentum, have called it.

    Let us allow the madman the day did not spoil; still is not over till the evening.


  3. haschmech says:

    @ Magnus

    "Let us not spoil the day of the madman; still is not over till the evening. "

    This saying could also come from Jesus, as he spent his last days living with his disciples.

    Only that day is now over 2000 years back and the madman still govern this world.

    "As it stands, the mohel will even continue to be allowed to lick the freshly circumcised penises of babies ..."

    If the soon to make the parents of the children involved, then it will probably go soon after the new law adopted in order.
    Or maybe it will then also be next to the mohel in Germany a state-approved Kinderpenisablutscher, but may take action only with perfect police certificate. Perhaps also of course Ablutscher this purpose at a FH then to Dipl. Offered.

    Is not it great to play, so what a small foreskin can pull everything by yourself? Possibly could the Federal Railroad still get the crazy idea to stretch a child's foreskin before an ICE. Cause the wind to these foreskins, which reached just could thus contribute to speed. The word tensioner could thus also be a very different meaning, namely a positive.

  4. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Haschmech

    As Anglo-Saxon I now said: "You made my day!" (Must be translated quite clear about: "You brought me gladness in the day"

    Whether, if the Wahnsinigen with their handiwork are through, through the graduate Kinderpenisablutscher probably satires will not post?

    If we do, in fact, in any case, as long as we still find ourselves in a crystal clear prohibition is mistaken.

    So I try it, not versuchslos stand back behind you, sometimes.

    A graduate Kinderpenisablutscher on the other. "How did because of the small Josef tasted?"

    "Was I a bit too salty. Also, I have the strong suspicion that his mother does not eat just a little garlic. Probably even pork ham. "

  5. haschmech says:

    @ Magnus

    Iss'n since jewöhnlich where no caraway turn on the thing?

    (I think I have at the Muslims and the Abrahamites also no more stone in the board. Throwing the me certainly immediately afterwards.)

  6. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Haschmech

    I am already looking forward to the Dipl. Penis lollipops Satire Protection Act.

    It could be about as loud (§ 666 333 of the Criminal Code):


    (1) vilified a Dipl. Penis lollipops in a way that belittles and slanders ehrabschneiderisch that this is likely to disturb the public peace,


    (2) the guild of Dipl. Penis lollipops total vilified, belittles and slanders ehrabschneiderisch that this is likely to disturb the public peace,


    (3) denigrated the work of Dipl. Penis lollipops as such, belittles and slanders ehrabschneiderisch that this is likely to disturb the public peace,

    which is not punishable by less than one year imprisonment.

    So that the matter would be what it should be, namely a public offense with decent Criminal lower limit, especially since none of enticing Criminal ceiling.

    All satirist finally knew where Barthel brings the must or the rubber meets the road.

    Freedom of expression must eventually find there its clear limits, where poor, the weak, the defenseless and the sick are her helpless, without consent, exposed.

  7. haschmech says:

    @ Magnus

    The good satirist still think of a better pseudonym instead Penisablutscher, so they can do nothing to us.

    Blood sausage Hansi, how about this? The Dipl. Penisablutscher goes incognito as a satirical blood sausage Hansi always, so also through the gaps of the Criminal Code.

    I also did not know what was formerly a mohel. Today I know it is THE dream job for child molesters.

  8. haschmech says:

    Addendum to my last comment.

    I wrote "... what a mohel.", So past tense. This must be a Freudian protective function on my part was his, because what a mohel (like) eats, we now know all too well.

    And Magnus, I made me whatever my day. For how should people like us can endure in this world at all else?

  9. Lisa says:

    As all the comments here, it's all about the mohel. The Muslims no one speaks ...

  10. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Lisa

    Your objection is justified, it looks here, just like as if it'll go only to those.

    Overall, this is here on this page, but not so.

    A circumcision with perhaps six or eight years, betäubungslos, common before the assembled relationship, as with the Muslims is no better than the Jewish version.

    In the latter, however, occurs when a mohel performs the traditional thing, even those Abschleckperversion added.

    And when people take a closer think about what it means symbolically and psychologically over the physical mutilation addition, the can be no mistake.


  11. Lisa says:

    The whole discussion in Germany is only about the Jewish variant. No one would want to make a new law, if it would affect only the Muslims.

    This whole circumcision thing is a Neolithic cult and no one knows more, why you do that actually ...

  12. Lisa says:

    I just talk of Obama flew over to the UN. Since there is a passage that stands out from the beautiful edifice of lies:

    "The future must not belong to Those Who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, Those who did condemn slander must therefore condemn the hate we see When The image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. "

    Who knows what will grow from the Holocaust religion for strange rituals.

  13. Lisa says:


  14. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Lisa

    Thanks for the tip and the link.

    An interesting development.

    The President represents "those who slander the Prophet of Islam" in the meaning of their necessary conviction in a direct relationship with the hatred that you see when the image of Jesus Christ profaned or the Holocaust is denied.

    My dear slide.

  15. haschmech says:

    @ Magnus

    "... If the image of Jesus Christ ... is profaned."

    That with the image but is interesting in this context. Because there we have it again: the real Jesus and the wrong Jesus, (a picture) is just a cheap copy. Sometimes it is hard for many, these two to keep them apart. Because after the revelation, Jesus calls himself the bright (or bright) morning star. But if you can not be confuse, then you quickly figure out how this is really meant by it.

    With the image of Jesus Christ is nothing else is meant than just the cross on which the prince of this world has died. Look after things, this saying is of great importance. He who has an ear, let him hear!
    The cross is actually a symbol of the so-called Antichrist. The true Jesus, as all who are of the same stuff, because they were born of water and spirit, which can kill anyone. All who are born of the flesh, the follow willingly the Antichrist. These are those who uphold the cross and revere it and the cross turn is a, if not the most important symbol of the celestial body sun. Those who have an evil spirit in themselves, are all sun worshipers. These include the Moslems and the Jews and also all false Christians.

    The Jews always refer to the five books of Moses, which they call their law. But just as there is a right way and wrong Jesus, so there is a right way and a wrong Moses, and the right Moses preached the following terms of circumcision:

    5.Mose 10:16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin, the foreskin of your heart, and be not obstinate henceforth!

    And one of the Prophet repeated it again even:

    Jeremiah 4: 4 Circumcise yourselves to the LORD and removes the foreskin of your heart, ye men of Judah, and ye inhabitants of Jerusalem, so my wrath go forth like fire, that none can quench it, because of your bad actions sake!

    And Jesus also said, what happened to the true prophets, including the real Moses:

    Luke 11:47 Woe unto you, that ye build the tombs of the prophets! Your fathers killed them.

    The real Jesus they have also tried to kill. But this told them in advance that they would not succeed. And so it is, too. The real Jesus is alive!

    It must be true but also what concerns me. For it is said, who has the real Jesus once assumed for itself, it does not get him, no matter what will try its reflections caster yet to get back to perform a separation brought about. No chance boy!

    Because if I read something like this:

    John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and what your father desires, you want to do; who was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it.

    Why would the real Jesus say something like that if He would be the son of this man killer?

Leave a Reply