The lie, with which we shall deal now is, indeed known not only all the loyal readers of this page, but otherwise many people as such, but is taken not only because of their current roll cover, but also here because they have a special mechanism paradigmatic shows.
It is the Constitution lie.
We have a constitutional court, a constitutional protection, known as Parties to the Constitution sheet, anti-constitutional groups and parties, some enemies of the constitution, only one thing: a constitution.
In the pleading namely, the Basic Law, which, like as if it could not be otherwise, is all over the country called our Constitution clearly is there that a Constitution is still pending:
Article 146 of the Basic Law:
"This Basic Law, which applies after completion of unity and freedom of Germany for the entire German nation loses its validity on the day on which a constitution comes into force, which has been adopted by the German people in a free decision."
It now points to this Article, makes you interesting experiences.
The Basic Law was but now stop but our Constitution. The Basic Law is our de facto constitution. The article is from after the war, the situation is not longer reflects, is outdated basically void. Some, even lawyers, rotate only the eyes and look at me as if I was mentally a little underprivileged, gaga.
All these people wipe the product you are so aside, as it were, to change the constitution, they spend as our constitution, just in spirit, to explain such an essential passage as obsolete.
Who are now the "enemies of the constitution", right: Basic Law enemies?
The Federal Constitutional Court has a fundamentally illegal name Verfassungsschhutz ditto, the parties' constitutional arc "it can not exist, nor enemies of the constitution.
It has quite simply surrounded the Constitution with the false notion Constitution and derived composites, with the formulation of lies "in our constitution, the Basic Law, is ..." that you feel readily make every ridiculous, perhaps even as enemy of the constitution to which this does not submit to titulieren.
This is the type of lie where the lie is made by millions of simple, durable repetition and by a variety of conversion lies to the supposed naturalness.
It would have been the German people may be wondering, yes, no, actually need, whether it waiving the Article 146, which would then actually obsolete, would accept as a constitution, the Basic Law.
I am quite sure that someone may be of the opinion that the Basic Law is our constitution: it is thus clear but the Basic Law.
The question remains: why all this Lügerei, but if all these liars else so much swear by the Basic Law, this "constitution faithful"?
Well, the article is somewhat of unity and freedom of the German people; behind it is still some question marks (even if, just then but de facto, the loss of German territories accepted), especially as that which the Constitution, the Germans would give himself might, if left what one would have, wofern you said that the unit is now given in freedom, finally.
The whole Lügerei has so thoroughly their reason.
You should make the Article 146 forget with all its implications.
The win now may soon new urgency because the German people could give a Constitution, treaties, as ESM, membership in military alliances, wars of aggression, even if authorized by the UN as it were, the subjugation of German law under EU law, no matter how many otherwise, prohibited.
Nobody wants the Constitution liar in Berlin and elsewhere also imagine only in nightmares.
- Advertisement -
Tags: constitution , constitutional lie
In a short video on an interview with Mr. Voßkuhle the professor ashamed himself as a liar, because he responds to the Journaille question whether the Federal Republic of Germany to end go with yes, because then could not go with the Basic Law further, then one must (for Europe) have a constitution! Is not that great, this boy admits that he is only basic law-President and not the Constitutional Court President!
He does not say that the "description" v. Art. 23 of Teritorialprinzip to the new formulation "way to Europe" without any referendum
Was carried out in 2000, a monstrous process!
It's really frightening what is currently "everything" going on ... I think we are on the right track to make humanity aware of the evil and save ... before it's too late!
Thank you iknews, your support has helped me!
Hello!
I write this for years. It always makes me mad to have to watch how, here in our country for so long a construct of lies is made the basis of society by the circumstances that are revealed clearly and irrefutably in your message. If the base is poisoned, nothing good comes out of it further. This can also be good at all, really all political discourses and decisions, whether to Europe, the euro, the ESM, etc., etc., read. And it's getting worse. The lie becomes a cancer that the body, it has spread to kill, is in process now.
At the same time they can now also hide less and less - so how this could be so still practiced successfully since reunification. It's important that there is enough reasonable, insightful and responsible people, and especially bloggers and Internet activity on participants, is that, just as you have done here, put your finger in the wound and assist in the investigation.
The right scene, which has long been used for the topic exploitation of aggressions and frustrations you should there be risky. These are precisely the fact that even promoted and advanced from this liar state to do with the Nazi each lobe him not agreeable to truth-telling in advance silenced. Therefore, one can not factually true and factual enough to argue. It just needs the Basic Law clinging simply take the original text, or known, also available on the web and in Youtube testimony of the fathers of the Basic Law. That is enough; Controversy and resentment are there only counterproductive.
Something has much more explosive power than is generally supposed. There must be many more such people who speak the truth openly, and that clear, uncompromising, clearly.
Regards
GLR
@ Gerd-Lothar Reschke
"You can not factually true and factual enough therefore argue."
My consent, but with a weight restriction.
It depends on the type of text that you selected.
In my satires "argue" I frequently not only objectively; otherwise there would be no yes; and satires can Ibid afford even and especially in the most serious and weighty relationships, which the purely objective and factual accurate reasoning can not.
Sometimes the text types are mixed at me; that is, a content mercilessly accurate reasoning still written with a satirical undertone, or set satirical passages as interpolations in the text otherwise fully liable seriously.
Many people begin only with the thought, if correct ideas come along so weird that they therefore are scratching their heads.
In addition, we must not let our take humor.
And has not in any way or getting serious writing (well, maybe is good satire the most serious writing at all ...) but also the important function to show people that a sitting over there who sees the world not crotchety, likes to laugh.
This facilitates access to many things, from which they are afraid that they krummgelogen were weggelogen.
To that extent, Satire - even if the reader does not like Upper consciously remember - be a kind of subtle handout, the softening of the Mental depressed bulwark.
(This is now yet another approach for a separate article to it; I will probably use the entire comment as input for it.)
LG
Magnus
Even me a few thoughts on laughter and satire.
I sit now already for years with the crisis of our monetary system and the consequences of this crisis apart. So with what I call the "biggest fraud in human history" (he is also the smartest and most sophisticated of all). And I've been able to make some observations laugh and satire. (I myself like to laugh often and by the way - but not our political and central banking system criminals - as it passes me, just like guys like Hitler & Co.), namely about the:
The satire here now takes mightily: Pispers, the "institution" in the ZDF and so on ... It's like in the GDR, because there was always the beautiful Honecker jokes. Very funny. There are also websites that take a satirical and even sarcastic style, eg Rott / Meyer.
I then look always: If the satire used to bring the whole truth, or the problem or the energy aufbrächte an awareness of the full problem (also suffering energy, horror, at best, impulses for action and responsibility), "weggelacht" ?
I type this satire and also it triggered laughter does not like. It channeled this energy in the sense of a system that is so tolerant, even criticism in the ZDF Institute (Schramm was probably too directly and is or has been) to allow, where you then times really heartily at the Fed or the can laugh banking system. The next day, bringing his money back to the bank.
This is not a criticism of satire as such now. The idea of waking people in a creative and above all an unusual way, I think is great. It is important that then really takes place waking up. The greatest part awakening happens but unfortunately only where it is really uncomfortable, sometimes in the form of a real shock. Although nobody wants that (I do not), but it works.
Now reminds me of a Cassandra. The really liked so now none. But she was right. And if she had packed her warning as a satire, it would degenerate to the entertainment value. Just as today, in this rundown culture, as well as almost everything has degenerated to the entertainment value.
Regards
GLR
@ Gerd-Lothar Reschke
Quite right and important, what you say regarding the double-edged nature of satire, the "Weglachens".
Hence it is necessary satire, when it comes to such elementary things as addressed here, of course, come as tungsten steel.
So that only the first has something to laugh who already knows what's going on, so the same to the treatment available to him may feel a certain pleasure: but not the sleep sheep.
This is the art of effective political satire.
The Käsper of which I qua sheep media (Schramm is probably in fact an exception) mitbekomme are, of course, to Weglachsorte.
They form a valve, there is laughter, everything is good or not so good, but it has relieved a fallacy for freedom of expression, so for freedom in general, can be put to bed the next day to be much happier to work.
I do not think you'll find this sort of satire with me all that much. If you do, please let me know.