Heroes in the High Halls?
Where is good, the term "hero" today?
Is he not always suspicious?
Well, in US America maintains one every fallen soldier as a "hero" to describe, even if he has only cowardly bombing wedding parties, his bird due to a technical fault crashed with him.
To do no more to be said.
"Heroes of labor" existed in the GDR: Today they are called low-wage workers in precarious employment. Or temporary workers.
And everyday heroes, the hospital mature for her courageous intervention of several young people or zutode be beaten, of which many believe they were even blame (!) So that they would have expected.
Are among the people who hide behind a Guido Fawkes mask, after all, a few secret heroes?
Can at least still Sportsman be something similar to real heroes?
Reprobates bishops?
Protection of the Constitution when they terminate without notice? Is that enough?
Constitutional Court judges or even President, the reason Unlawful, under who knows what dangers, not just by waving?
Josef Ackermann, Kuwait next stop, now a hero or anti-hero?
Would we still have heroes, or rather just not at all, so we do not have as much reason to be ashamed of our cowardice?
Is therefore the word "hero" not many actually already a quasi-synonym for "idiot"?
What is abolished going on, the word or the heroism itself?
What kind of hero we bedürften, we set times that the event is now the most?
If you can not make everyone in search of unknown heroes? Or is this a pointless search? Why? Why or why?
-----------------------------
Again, in their own right: I will on the Dresden philosophy Festival "figures of thought" speak about "heroism in Nachpostmoderne" (3.8 to 5.8..). There will then provide answers to at least some of the questions above.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Heroism
Hero is now at least a synonym for riders who are recipients of orders, mandatory human, Adjusted, subject ...