The whole Syria coverage of the so-called "quality media" stinks, with rare exceptions (eg Rainer Hermann in the FAZ, who questioned the massacre at Hula) to heaven. One can no longer speak of a reporting actually already. (A "beautiful" example of some already idiotic propaganda to be named the "world community" can also be found in my article " Has Syria miracle weapons? ".)
SPON, for some time the most stupid sheep medium of Germany (not only in this department), it has to so plump started in the last few weeks and months that it sets a lot of angry, and sarcastic comments.
After all, when again a propaganda styled by item, leaning solely on information from rebels, with suggestive gunships image appears, now also follows the small little sentence: "An independent review of the information is not possible."
The whole article , that is not one in the sense at all, as if he made it almost entirely comes from the specified news agencies, which is why the thing at the FAZ reads almost identical, at least not quite so one-sided suggestive, like the still of weeks ago case was.
The manifold reader protests seem to have just a little effect. (Give those to the other, at any time or Treat!)
But we analyze a little bit what the FAZ writes, initially the first sentence of the above linked article:
"Despite all the appeals of the international community to renounce violence perpetrated only a few weeks after the massacre at Hula another massacre in Syria government militias."
Who, pray tell, is the international community?
And that "In spite of all appeals" suggests, despite the "shall ... have" it as it of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey (it is still unclear how much the United States and the United Kingdom do with infiltrated special forces there how many paid mercenaries there "act") with money and arms supported rebels represent, must be done.
Then:
"The head of the Free Syrian Army called on the inhabitants of the country for Friday for a general strike in order to protest against the massacre. Should prove true the statements of the opposition groups, it would be the worst massacre of civilians since the start of protests against the Assad regime in March last year. "
Aha. A general strike so on Friday. The IG Metall in Germany can also always only strike on Sunday, hehe. And: If the massacre actually took place, but everything else is wrong, the opposition groups committed in reality itself, would it not still the worst massacre since the protests began? Where is the logic? Ugh Deibel!
Furthermore, it is still the talk of that in New York (!!!) based "human rights organization" Human Rights Watch said Syrian government forces officially accused (from New York), which is to be identified on a video on the net clearly, they set cluster bombs one.
Soso.
So there goes again A video on the internet to put such a claim in the world.
More blatant it brings the world .
For the first two sub-headings is (the second, very clever to set, "Russia blocked"):
"Assad's henchmen burn down a village"
Among then is actually:
"A fugitive from the villagers told the news channel al-Jazeera that there had been in the militia to Alevis who were loyal to the clan of President Bashar al-Assad. They were attacked over the village, after the rebels had withdrawn from the area. All buildings were set on fire. "
Why in the sub-heading, big and fat, the reality form, the indicative, then including the ability to form the subjunctive?
And, aha, A witness has just Al-Jazeera "reported", a medium based in Qatar, which can be described as a war party therefore confidently, and that is enough in the world, the world will suffice.
Not me.
I put in conclusion worth it to state clearly tell you:
I am not one of THOSE YOUR "WORLD COMMUNITY" !!!
Shame on you once your Volksverschafer, if you ever know what to feel ashamed, for this type of "reporting" of "journalism"!
- Advertisement -
Tags: Human Rights Watch , lying , massacre at Hula , media , Rainer Hermann , Syria , Volksverschafer , World Community
Welcome to my world of impotent anger.
Beautiful dissected and the warmongers (unfortunately without consequences) cut around the ears.
If I do this (regular) in my environment also do so ..äääh propaganda, pardon press releases dissect and my counterpart so that shows that there is, no matter how extensive the Journaillentext is, the statement value always wafting around the zero point, I reap most incomprehension to rejection.
Why is that?
Most people assume that the "official" channels are actually independent and report facts (now I can not even laugh at this view so dramatically widespread is this misconception). No, the MSM follow solely the reputation of Mammon. Nothing else!
Most MSM consumers are either not capable of distinguishing between indicative and subjunctive (how can that be, the best education system that does wo's do give? ^^), Or else, and I see the real problem, it is the vast majority of people just simply do not care.
What is the foundation of this lack of interest?
It may not be a part unherbelichen are in our much vaunted Western "community of values" in the daily rat race, so struggle to survive on artificially generated. The people have enough to do with himself. Caught in the case of consumption "best economic system ever" (? Actually for whom), condemned to eternal kicking (like the frog ->) in the cream of compounding system.
Only the frog has no one said that the fat was removed from the cream, they thus can never be fixed, actually is no more cream, but only looks like (see FIG. Fiat money).
But the employment and diversion effect remains. And that is the purpose.
The whole paired with one of the downsides of the information age, the merciless information overkill, in which not more every week, but now a sow has to be hunted through the village every day already.
This necessarily implies the need for the mass of an external prefilter.
And who filters the information on the hand of interpretation.
I see it like you, that this deliberate manipulation is a crime.
There are desk workers ... again.
It's always the desk workers who are rarely held accountable. To protect themselves from responsibility, flees to in conjunctive statements, the transport on the one hand a falsified statement, on the other hand, are intended to prevent recourse.
My hope is this: that these perpetrators, whether to be tried after the collapse of this whole pig system in a scene corresponding to the Nuremberg Tribunal as well from the Springer, mirror, Burda, Bertelsmann and how it all hot, as the desk workers on historical models.
Involved as active on warmongering by posturing and manipulation, have the Worth in my eyes nothing else.
So, lunch break is over. ;-)
@ JaNeeIsKlar
"Welcome to my world of impotent anger."
Well, you could, of course, sometimes almost despair with which cheap, not even halfway original manipulative tricks to get through the makers of "quality media" on the ground again and again.
But not at all.
I had been on top of the frequent abständigen reader comments towards that they are no longer censor all able, because on the one that fell then too many on the other hand they could close their forums then equal to what would be plenty revealing and not good for business.
These comments, which are of course not read as often as the respective main articles, put one hand a certain counterbalance to the latter, but also have another effect.
They read at least the activation ends, certainly to a considerable extent those responsible for the main contributions are characterized by their doings constantly faced: so this also not before or can assert other, you have not crude on their mistakes and failures, their methodology noted.
I have so much to do with my own blog, also with answering comments that I externally only relatively rarely write that; but I would still Leisure Indians, so it would certainly be my favorite hobby evening to annoy these people.
Anyone who wants to change something, know how to read and write, should be befleißigen thereof.
I see it anyway, apart from the linguistic practice, a more effective means of democratic participation, as it represents the crosses at the Recorder parties.
Basically, these people need every day shit storms, thoughtful, well-written, well-reasoned Prostestnoten without number.
As I also already mentioned above, is at least the mirror, my impression are also other "quality media" in its Syria-"reporting" at least a bit more cautious, which I attribute to a substantial extent on the manifold reader criticism.
We need these people, almost all keep us stupid obvious to say and prove that we are not there: that they are, if they think we are stupid.
They can, for it is their worst hacks are usually arrogant and vain, not guzzle.
This weakens their mental constitution, their self-confidence, they can either make yet more stupid errors or be careful.
In both cases a gain.
LG
"... It is still unclear how much the United States and the United Kingdom do with infiltrated special forces there, how many paid mercenaries there" act "..."
In http://nocheinparteibuch.wordpress.com/ and http://hinter-the-fichte.blogspot.de/ there is clear.
JaNeeIsKlar
Since I speak from a soul. I had a discussion with my neighbor on the ESM Treaty and even said that the mainstream media just do not tell the truth.
What does the?
He "informed" themselves.
However, ARD and ZDF!
And then asks me where my problem lies with ESM, but everything is well ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IIeOQqM7Ss
http://alles-schallundrauch.blogspot.de/2013/02/die-fsa-sets-child-soldiers-in-syrien.html