Let us analyze now (I use the knowledge of the Erstartikels advance) a little of what's going on, so make first a few questions.
Are "journalists" who "report" so one-sided as suggestive (as I said, before the massacre in Hula it was even worse), can be harnessed to the propaganda vehicle for any fictional "world community", just stupid, as it were directed not even think could end biorobot?
Or do they do that full, conscious intention?
And if on purpose, voluntarily, as a little lie for the good can never hurt, or forced, otherwise they would lose their pathetic job?
I mean, that their motives cover the full range of relevant spectrum occur insonderheit many hybrid forms.
So, for example, as that which forced manipulated in terms of his bourgeois existence and mitlügt, finally fooling, he did so voluntarily, by suggesting itself, the little bit of mess is yes for the good, for the education of the people simply necessary to think finally getting dumber is: and at the end of himself believes in each slurry that is injected him through the slurry pumps of the news agencies of the "world community" in his computer.
Then of course there are journalists who are so simple as specific agents. Where you do not ask for more about their motives.
And there are also a few people - you can feel that when you learned hinlesen accurate - where such a thing stirred as a kind of conscience or journalistic ethics, others also (it mixes in turn often) that are slightly lighter in the head , wonder how long it still holds, even if angrier as mocking reader comments, but not only, but because they are very well have other, the opposite presented information and to process them mentally able.
I do not know, however, how can I help such people should directly, because probably they can usually not even run the risk of a line-toeing colleagues to say: "Look, this is a curious blog! What do you think of what the guy because lets go over us? "
Or: "Look what's available on the net for Spinner. Since you can look at times you an extra copy exquisite! "-?
But still: Abständige reader comments and blogs like this not entirely fail to impress with certainty.
Because Mr. Rabe can at least point out the Chefradakteur, Mr Krawulke, to the effect appeal, in the editorial conference that now not only at the network anarchists, but horribile dictu !, even with the seasoned readership base is considerable opposition coverage not only of your own home brisk, but as particularly dangerous, alternating between rage and scorn, not only uninformed illiterate, Krakeelern and relevant conspiracy theorists.
The ice is getting thinner, the dilemma getting bigger: just for newspapers such as the FAZ.
Either slavishly side for the "world community" write (ie the US-NATO empire) and lose more and more reputation of readers, or aufmucken what you can not afford but at other levels. (Or can only supposes.)
After all, that's why I mention the FAZ in such contexts regularly, the problem one is there of all key media (sheep media), even among some of the leading minds, already quite aware of.
Therefore, there also appear - between bargain - the point-addressing products from the likes of Jürgen Kaube recently, Rainer Hermann, Holger Steltzner, Berthold Kohler.
It has been there to understand that there is not just brainwashed Blödel in this our people who believe everything in the newspaper. Often, at least in their environment, leaders.
And that you somehow have to keep them happy.
Because I need to fulfill my duty publicist, just often read SPON me reinziehen their stupidity, but the conservative-liberal educated bourgeoisie must not do that.
This is rather cancel his subscription FAZ, when it finally reached him. And everyone you know to tell why.
And what it itches star and mirror image and when any intellectual pours scorn on them? This makes them almost nothing (the picture may be even more benefit).
The FAZ but can something like that if it is sound and well written, the point is true, especially when still others to come, it is becoming more common to just spread the word, is up for discussion, now not so light touch afford as those mentioned above and cohorts: for then they gradually loses the aura, from which they live.
To summarize: I am what the German media landscape is concerned, is cautiously optimistic.
- Advertisement -
Tags: FAZ , Journalism , Media Psychology
Dear Magnus
Thank you and great respect for these two grenades strong product!
Ps. http://www.mysticalforum.ch/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=13438
http://www.mysticalforum.ch/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=11460
@ Dude
Thank you! It's great that someone reads at least!
I knew the first page Linked from you already, since I do with you and keep checking back look: very interesting.
The second seems just to evolve towards ...
Did I even wondered whether I am there should not sign up (I think you let too German to have a say), although my Schwyzerdütsch suffices only passively (ie, in order, as Schwabe, fortunately, to be able to decipher quite easily what your telling you, if your your dialect - which is now hopefully no offense - so, uh - your idiom verschriftlicht), I do not actively controlling it. (To you if you fast talking among themselves, always make sure to understand, I would probably need two weeks constant practice.)
Anyway, I'm impressed with what was sometimes so everything comes up in your "Mystical Forum".
PS: Did not have time "Chrome" to read all (have the history only be read), but that'll catch up.
Magnus
Please like, not worth mentioning, is indeed from the heart. :-)
In addition, I read everything anyway what you publish here every day, even if I do not always know what to say, so after all ... * lol *
The links: Have these two linked back here again. Unfortunately, the access is a bit thin, as you can see in the "Real Time View" - but you know certainly that ... ^^: - /
After all, the junior item came to the feeder (yet believable Part I - VII). The Sacred Nine - still the best - that is still missing. ;-)
Here I have way more times a theme-best-of compiled. http://www.mysticalforum.ch/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=20378
If you can find time for it, and feel like I am of course when you log since miteinbringst. :-)
And as chromium. No hurry! :-)
Best regards
Today in "Behind the spruce": "You can see the entire staff of the" Centre "means the chief disciple and shopkeeper Abdul Rahman."
Strong product!
http://einarschlereth.blogspot.se/2012/08/us-verzweiflung-zeigt-sich-in-syrien.html