You can cut off the head of a snake. You can actually strangle, break her Genack or totbeißen it.
But the idea that our society would be relieved by explosives, thus a decapitation strike the evil leader is, at best, naive. (I think but not that the Wachowski brothers are naive.)
Salvation through terror?
Of course there have been in the history of mankind many legitimate resistance movements that were unable to counter effectively a violent tyranny otherwise than by its own force of arms.
Here and now, but it's about global structures (even if one feels that it would be justified and supported) can not be changed so.
It's about the financial system, and it's about awareness. One can not wegbomben, and not the other way.
If anything, I would be a Muslim, because I believed that. (Bad joke.)
Or, for my sake: Let us once before, as the prevailing financial system would wegzubomben.
How many deaths would you like it? Everywhere burning cities, destruction?
And who or what then riseth at ease from the rubble?
It's simple: the old system in a new form, because its protagonists would be easy to show in the situation who caused quite a degree of stability, on the other hand who have done all the mischief (no matter to what extent that was true or not).
Now just people who, referring to the Georgia Guidestones and other statements, the NWOlern pee the project of a radical population reduction (nice word for billions of murder) to the already self piss leg, diffuse, sometimes concrete depend violent fantasies after, apparently not realizing that they should be scheduled just that.
How, then, pray tell, are the masters of the City of London (etc.) Introduce a total fascism without them an excuse, a reason would come for it? (That they exacerbate the over false flag operations itself again and again. Almost given is not enough.)
You have to play as long Democrat somehow, as they are not anbombt. Nuke it, so they can save these annoying Luxury quickly.
So is (apart from all the innocent dead and maimed) each, the anbombt against the financial Schacks, they only strengthen the bottom line.
Their power grows with every terrorist attack.
Still, there are police officers, military personnel, "security experts" who doubt that things were right: the will to them as soon as the tattered colleague is next to them, pass away.
The result would be more than a little war.
That's why I want to see the Guy Fawkes masks more.
Set the fundamentally false signal.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Matrix
Hm, the Valium-phrase "violence is no solution" then? That may be ethically and morally commendable, historically and practical but this statement is a "business as usual" equal.
Or does anyone have a system that would have changed thanks to insight or even reason itself?
Even a collapse brings, at best, only short-term, not long-term improvement, because the real power is to be sought not on political but on dynastic level.
The conclusion of the French. Revolution it was build in a (political) buffer zone in order to disguise the real actors of power before the eyes and the direct access of the populace and protect.
This buffer zone is controlled by the financial system.
Still works flawlessly.
Who wants to change something in the system needs to serve up some dynasties, namely just as uncompromising as the currently ruling dynasties for almost 400 years with the rest of the world, so we jump around.
And the advocates of "violence is no solution" -Schlaftablette I answer two things:
First Ja ne, is clear.
2 Whether you take a look at recent news or in history books: Violence has always been the engine of change.
If it does not fit one or.
Whoever replies yet rightly, that the supposed change in the system of the French Revolution was flipped again after a short time. Properly, but doing nothing is not a solution, because with this setting I need not even go to the hairdresser, because the head wool grows again after anyway.
Yes, the greed as a constant companion of power is omnipotent and wins ALWAYS over time the upper hand because she happens to be a human trait, but a haircut from time to time on dynastic level, like, two inches below the nose hold, I for the benefit of all as inevitable.
The know the profiteers of the system, and therefore keep us constantly distracted by themselves. On all levels social and ethnic strata are mutually instigated, whether within a country, a continent or globally. Not matter.
Those who have the power to hold, demonstrate every day that violence is indeed a solution. For their purposes. And it works.
A tumor is encountered but also with a scalpel, and not with Globoli, or ?!
@ JaNeIsKlar (Nick difficult)
You wear your perspective certainly before skillfully. Therefore, at first my respect for that.
You put all the weaknesses of my presentation so mercilessly and accurately disclose that I may be grateful to you for it only.
But. (This had probably come.)
But I see the history of humanity not as an eternally again must get ending cycle of necessary Köpfeabschlagens.
It has thousands of years ago - I call Confucius - after figures of thought developed to the extent that it might even be different.
(The fact that I try not to engage in esoteric soft bucket assembly here, you will find if you read otherwise time around, easy to get out.)
You get me in fact sweat. Despite Confucius et al.
I want to touch it again: I just do not give after. I am confident that torment and torture can be at least reduced. And I want, not only because I myself have experienced extreme agony, torment yourself no other and also not kill.
Which does not mean that I watched when one wanted to stab my children, the only aunt would be a social call.
It's about the direction. A few crazed idiots like it always will be. But we have a planet on which no need that such rule on around him. For which there are organic farms. Well-guarded. Few.
Human thought is basically unlimited and has already spawned so many beautiful things that I will not let at least my mow down the idea (which is not now directed against you), it needed at all times of the murder and manslaughter en masse.
Apart from that: A good friend of mine repeatedly emphasized that hang etc. for genocide and relatives is far too low penalty. That was graciously and quickly. They belonged to the organic farm. In addition, which provided the better deterrent. Because they would look so long as they would get paid in the earth digging by hand to reflect on their misdeeds time until the end of their days.
The very bad Gesockse, I am convinced has, because even before such a fate more afraid than before death.
Death is too cheap.
@ JaNeIsKlar
Another thing.
As a model of a thoughtful global change calculated (the word here is sometimes seriously) a Hollywood movie? Can it be?
A concoction of the Verdumpfbackungsoberanstalt of Today?
It's even more stupid?
Do you think, who think nothing in what they do, cause?
These are absolute professionals. Although they are not able to zerprömpeln my mind. But I'm not their target audience. And that there will be some people who will not relieve them of their crap, even the know. You are betting that it will not play a role, if only the mass is rolled.
Unfortunately, however, they also set out that no one had a sufficient articulation of force against it. Here is a precisely this.
Said has been said. I said this yesterday.
Sometimes it takes a long time, until the thrown stone is the receiving base.
Time you have to have when the zerpfropften Zeitgeist is to show where the gardener diameter depends.
@ Magnus
that I will take you in addition to the summer temperatures sweat, I comment as follows: again any time;-)
Basically we are both on the same page pacifist, no question. I would also prefer if the elites hinstellten and said, "Ok, we see one, we let the shit, so we will not get that mankind is far more capable".
Unfortunately, the world does not work, so we actually are in a perpetual circle of mutual Köpfeabschlagens. Although we do not have to.
We would also result in no wars, do it anyway. We would not let anyone starve on this planet, do it anyway. Thousands of times. Every day.
And that's not a problem of production capacity, but a question of the distribution key. And in turn, is made by man undoubtedly and ultimately leads to the financial system and those who control it.
Confucius is a good counter-example, but only limited applicability because philosophies usually establish themselves within cultural and thus dynastic boundaries.
And despite Confucius China has a dynastic power structure and history that dates back even more than twice as far in the history of (generalized) than the "Western".
Of course there is always "some idiots". The there was out there, and that will never die out with security also. The part of it.
But this is also the main reason why there must be basic rules.
The problem arises when these "some idiots" not only control the primary system, but also still ignore to satisfy lower instincts about this very necessary basic rules and doing their perpetration confidence in the structures created exactly THEREFOR hide.
The ideal location to parts & Conquer par excellence to play.
From this position the actors of my belief to never have to be removed by peaceful means. Unfortunately. To protect the system, the system protects them. Both get each other.
Actually it's called a symbiosis in nature. Since this symbiosis, however, runs at the expense of the host, they must be regarded as parasitic.
And this is exactly where you have to ask who to give preference to: humanism or the self-preservation instinct. This brings us to the point '... if someone wants to stab my children ...'.
May you forgive me, but I interpret your Biobauernhofansatz as philosophical emergency exit from the dilemma that arises forcibly by the consequence of the answer to the above question.
If we're in movie templates (for that I will be coming back), so I see in your Biobauernhofszenario described the picture of "Papillon" (1973), where the protagonist is left at the end on a foreclosed mini island itself.
In the film, he is then still an escape route - exactly THAT is the "organic farmers" to fear that which is why I give the preference to the barber, as philosophically necessary evil. Is there a philosophy without without internal contradiction?
The real danger is nevertheless that the newly created organic farmer is carved out by his old friends, or will at least tried. Examples from the present: Tymoshenko, Khodorkovsky.
Finally briefly to the movies: You are right. Of course, Hollywood movies are always to be treated with caution as they are concoctions precisely those who attack the films content superficially.
The Guy Fawkes mask is a symbol, a condensate of a complex statement.
Yes, the symbol falls short, but it picks the wrong level, the policy of.
But this icon is at least as suitable (small) common denominator for the recognition of the necessity of resistance. Even if it actually falls short in the final analysis.
You will provide that the masses come to a realization of who and what now is actually the harmful factor in the system, it never. The white to prevent the system. This is exactly what it was created. And it is situated clever enough to have enough accomplices to make profit from it, without sharing the actual administration authority must (keywords: Media - Politics - Group beings).
But I prefer the hair appointment, I also re-training for organic farmers for 500 oligarchs all the Guide Stone logic.
From a purely humanistic reasons, and despite opposition:-)
@ JaNeIsKlar
I had expected that you mayest come back with a vengeance. You've pretty much driven in fact, in each of my Ritz building a precisely crafted wedge. This is me not often, if ever, happens here by my literary homeland.
You have the Guidestones struck my ears, the Tymoshenko and the Khodorkovsky (I had it made with all due respect, as well), wisely concedes that the Guy Fawkes mask is not quite the cream of the crop though, my Hollywood-argument sent weakened, referred the organic farm on the Endloskabale incidentally, Confucius into the realm of an old non-center, difficult to challenge brought the dumb masses into play, spotted my sweating elegant, then shot me by a philosophical question almost: in short, all the work done.
Yes, I know that my reasoning, because my children, as you have in addition also shown, so basically everywhere, ungewissermaßen stands on feet of clay.
But I think, however, that the way without violence is to search until the last possible moments reasonable.
Maybe this is naive, and maybe you're right. Maybe I'm irresponsible, even cowardly, by I do not make the necessary hardness of the location and existence.
From a story out your speech is more logical than mine.
What I want there to say?
Only that I try to change it.
Jane
Magnus
All
(Please Hiezu also consider the comment strand of Erstartikels. https://unzensiert.zeitgeist-online.de/2012/05/24/guido-fawkes-nwo-schafsseckel/ )
It was by no means a coincidence that I said on this subject here no more. It did not work. It would have diarrhea only fadiger.
I now have the brain for days if this question racking my, so I already almost terror came over, it could still burn through anything.
But what one does not kills, makes one harder!
As much as I despise this wretched and vile Dreckskabale, detest and deplore, I had to realize that it can not be right - apart from the "little thing" that this discussed here work from the pen of the vulture family Wachowski sprung -, fire and to spit flame, so apparently to use just selbige the purpose of sanctifying agent, or only to goutieren already that use those malicious worms for their rule (off).
No! It can not be! Because it nourishes evil!
Which shunned at nothing blustering, fulminant and sometimes but very bothersome and repulsive acting scribbler of this blog here, which I so love and that's why, appreciate and honor, gave me some key phrases (see also in the other strand) already made clear it, that it is simply not legitimate and acceptable to behave contrary to the (ultimately only true) laws of love.
Thank you Magnus.
Following again highlighted the key phrases:
"You know that I am not a Christian; still have to forgive again and again in life, even himself. "
"This is madness, being confined by a popular uprising, which is a folk festival.
It may no longer official and only come up with the idea that he had to protect the wrong thing in front of the right people. "
"But I think, however, that the way without violence is to search until the last possible moments reasonable."
Sure, Jane, your flawless and rigorous argumentation here also at 1000 bar is still waterproof, as did Magnus had to acknowledge ungrudgingly, and yet you lie probably wrong.
No, it was not right, the baddies with such sentiments, as she lives the Inzuchtdynastiekabale too long practiced and preached to oppose.
The other reason I let this now a good friend of my hand, it ultimately gets to the point. (Incidentally, I have to use his leave this unchanged.)
Fallen Angel 3 wrote:
"" Kill the spiders, save the butterflies -. Sounds like a great idea, until you realize, did by killing the spiders, you become a spider yourself "
The loved ones do not have to be evil. You must be stronger. You would need the love and peace really with all power and energy that can afford them, represent and distribute. Those who have found inner peace could instruct people to be as well. Similarly to act. There are two ways to influence people: Threaten them - or convince them. The latter requires an enormous strength of character, a kind of mixture of kindness, sincerity and truthfulness. Threaten is easier, but also unsatisfactory. Who tried with violence, weapons, war, penalties etc. by bringing his views will surely have success - but he will eat away inside. And that's contagious! Like a plague try people who are corroded internally to share this inner emptiness, they want to be alone in their misery, they want that others feel just as empty as themselves. It does not bring too much to give these fallible human rights by giving them all the supplies which they shout even more destruction, more reasons to hate humanity, to hate this world and fear the future. What's going on currently, these conspiracy theories about Iran - once more! - That feeds the beasts, which basically have "always known it." But all this dirt that is to read current in the current media, not just a smile, not a good feeling - no harmony, no heat on a winter night. What we need is not splitting this humanity, as we already do with atoms, we need mergers, the merging of cultures, not the result of people into the abyss. And I believe that mankind evolved, that they continue to come, albeit with setbacks. But we have a kind of inner flame that never completely extinguished in us. A kind of fire that guides us to creativity, love and forgiveness. This flame we must keep in us alive, to kindle in others when hanging around in the dark. Whenever we can. And we can do it! Because we care about the people - they're not all the same, all these artists, and terrorists, these pirates and directors, these politicians, these prophets, those crazy - all these predators and all these angels on earth - they are not we do not care because they were, then we would jaded us not even express in a forum to do so. We would just wait for the death we had actually been suffered. We are mad at the world - because we love them! And because we love them, this world, these people - that's why we are also able to do it every day a little bit better. By ourselves, by our voice our thoughts into reality, by what we are. Humans, friends, lovers "
http://www.mysticalforum.ch/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=18865&p=189395#p189395
Well, what you can still say there ... Especially when you live those spiritual philosophy that is interested here when you click on my name apparently.
Nothing, except: "Fawkes strategy, as tempting as it appears also, is wrong!"
The sound indication Wacholtssszzzki can then also fall to the last small two whitefish.
But ... how else? The organic farms and the hairdresser you can tilt unfortunately, because it is not practical.
So how else? How else?
Despite all the Gemarter I have not yet had no reply. Your cunning and malice is simply unsurpassed ...
Greetings from Dude
But still an addendum:
So how else?
Of course, it is clear that it is only possible via a festival of the masses, after all these centuries finally get rid of these baddies.
But just here lies the rub, how else?
Occupy would have been a real chance, but 99% were in reality unfortunately hardly ever more than 1% (trend rapidly sinking), because just keep the machine running diligently on the bio-robots (believing they would) ...
"Well, we do have to make money, so we run hald endless as the hamster, and can push us over the cliff, like lemmings.
As surely come at some point, a colorful flower meadow on us, if we just keep running. "
So how to make this large mass, this dilapidated in inertia, lethargy and ignorance (understandably) people realize that they need to be self the change that they desire?
How else, if not by variants such as Occupy, which is meanwhile actually dead?
Or in other words: How do you get this 99% actually to the whole official tall tales finally to question seriously, is not to let on as the donkey with the carrot in front of the run-around, and ultimately the large (global!) actively assist festival and celebrate on that finally the golden age can be ushered in for all?
How then, when almost all are still preoccupied with the race in the wheel, the continuation of the parasitic machine?
So how else?
Fuck !, I've been looking for years to answer this question; one that makes sense and works, but this one, and only relevant law is not violated.
I still do not have ...
So how else?
@ Dude
"The be shunned at nothing blustering, fulminant and sometimes but very bothersome and repulsive acting scribbler of this blog here ..."
Your compliments to me are always stunning. Yesterday (or was it yesterday - no matter) I was of you still only as "brutal, cold and hard," praised (I hope my memory serves me not with respect to the order).
Fun and personal Geschmeicheltheit aside and the question.
"Sparing oneself from nothing": This could already be a keyword.
I grab this now not on my account.
But because it is not without courage.
And since few are called first. The (even though they: precisely because they praise sometimes, what may be done in a MSM newspaper as the FAZ for subjects such as ADHD, when it is good) respect and a hearing to the fact that they align their thinking are not storage of (in the so-called "alternative media" is also cooked a lot of crap), but strictly along the at least presumed correct.
You may just not be afraid to put in the "ranks" as mercilessly finger into the wound, as in those who are usually not theirs. A fortiori there.
So - if it's done right - has the MSM journalist who is not stupid (which gives it very well), no more excuses. It is not enough more to mock the third beer about what it was because of a helpless, salbadernder goat fish Seppel.
We need to be better in all respects stringent argue and write, as the. Ice cold and clear. (Also times as nice as I am sometimes, if you give me good wine.)
We have, so to speak, so pompous as it may seem, the more beautiful world, first mentally, build and expand.
At some point, even if they do not realize it or do not admit that the better and best of them want to go there too. A suction effect.
I see this quite already emerged as partially. (I will not say now what I found doing this, partly for me there is clear evidence, although not sufficiently probative, also a so-explicitly naming would be counter-productive, also I can feel it again and again based on certain things emotionally clear.)
It's about nothing more than the mental upper hand. And that this is also visible.
Whether "we" are the 99%, is initially irrelevant. (Are we not already, we are not even 1% But that does not matter..) We have to deliver the undeniably better job easily. Because I'm convinced I'm so "brutal".
This financial system is to justify nothing more nothing, as well. Nevertheless, it is every day all tattered as though a bit, but just sold still basically no alternative.
Nietzsche is no longer there. Except in our minds. He has given us enough. Now we have to break the old tables and set up new ones.
@ Dude
Even to your insight.
This shows, once again, and of which I spoke above, albeit initially only measured as the insight of this one (I am happy about it, but crying does not triumph! Thereat) that even relatively festgezurrte perspectives can be fruitfully drawn by good speech in doubt .
I did not just get the spread - so far? - Which only reached hundreds of thousands.
However, I would also write for bad, vulgar with probability bordering on certainty.
Since I have now times unfortunately it can not be bothered.
But I'm sure it something like the so-called "morphic fields" are. What I recently simplified by "Said said is" expressed.
Simply sprinkle seeds. What do you indeed constantly doing.
I saw today, the evening stroll with a best friend, at the Stuttgart Karlshöhe, a birch of probably a few years (he said 15, I whether I know fast growth of birch 6-8), the old on a one two feet high, thick stumps was emporgesprossen, having certainly, then beaten until only and for this their roots around him firmly in the earth.
I saw it for the first time.
Magnus
In order that again clearly emphasized (so that no one can misunderstand ...):
This should, especially in this context, be an honest, upright and heartfelt compliment to you.
Denn ich sehe eben auch genau in dieser brutal wirkenden Vorgehensweise, die aber immer und ausschliesslich in Liebe gründet, eins der einzigen zielführenden Mittel, um den weitverbreiteten Schlummer in den Massen – Untertanen genauso wie Obertanen (zu den Hintertanen sag ich hier nichts, ausser dass diese beleibe nicht schlummern, ganz im Gegenteil…) – zu durchbrechen, ihre Lethargie mit Schöpferischem, welches dem kreativen Geiste entspringt, so es bewusst und willentlich hervorgelockt, zu durchbrechen, und auf diese Weise, die grosse Welle des Festes mit steten, reinen und heiligen Tropfen über die Erde brausen lassen.
Nur, wie soll man denn überhaupt all die Biltleser und RTL-gukker ;-) mit den Tropfen erreichen, wenn diese sich vor ihren Matschscheiben dahinvegetierend, kaum noch zum Pissen aus dem Sessel schwingen können?
Irgendwie müssten vielleicht all die Hacker der Erde vereint werden , sodass diese dann dafür sorgen, dass die echten Informationen – frei zur Verfügung gestellt von deren Schöpfern – durch die Kanäle gejagt werden, anstatt des ständigen Geseiers heute.
Das wäre dann aber ne generalstabsmässige Übung, auf die auch garantiert sehr schnell entsprechende Gegenmassnahmen eingeleitet würden. With full force!
Gerissene, vermaledeite Teufelsbrut auch…
@ Dude
Meine beiden Antworten greifen zu kurz. Sie sind nicht schlecht oder falsch, aber immer noch zu wenig.
Ich habe aber gerade nicht mehr. Oder nur mehr von dem, was ich nicht sagen darf, jetzt schon noch zu sagen wüsste und auch dürfte, aber lieber, aus guten Gründen (noch) nicht sage.
Indes, wer feine Ohren hat, der kann all das, von dem ich eben nur raunte, was überdies nützlich, sehr wohl aus meinen Texten herauslesen.
@ Dude
(Comments overlapped; your last did not know.)
Ich meine nicht, dass es im von Dir angesprochenen Sinne an Information fehlt.
But I think I spoke this evening with my friends about it, that I have the explaining to pack in a separate article, of course, at this point you put forward by referring or citing the most important thing from your last comment.
And anyway the Guy Fawkes articles and -Galgenstränge total building.
Das soll die Rede hier natürlich keineswegs abwürgen.
Doch bedarf der spezielle Aspekt der verfügbaren bzw. verfügbar zu machenden Information einer eigenen, zusätzlichen Betreuung in einem eigenen Beitrag.
(Jetzt habe ich doch mehr, was ich auch sagen will und kann. Vorhin schlicht verseppelt.)
Guten Morgen die Herren,
na, da war die Nachtschicht ja mal wieder fleissig. :-)
Selbstverständlich ist mein philosophischer Ansatz des Feuer-mit-Feuer-bekämpfens auf der moralischen Ebene alles andere als Wasserdicht und aus humanistischer Sicht sogar widersprüchlich, was ich bereits eingestanden habe. Jedoch will ich diesen Gedanken nicht als Lösung, sondern als Mittel der akuten und temporären Schadensbegrenzung verstanden wissen.
Wenn die Feuerwehr bei einem Waldbrand eine Schneisse brennt, dann bedient sie sich (kontrolliert) des gleichen Mittels, das den primären Schaden verursacht, um weiteren, sich ausbreitenden Schaden abzuwenden bzw. einzudämmen. Wohl wissend, dass dies niemals ein Konzept sein kann um zukünftige Waldbrände zu verhindern.
Gibt es überhaupt ein funktionierendes Konzept Waldbrände zu verhindern, ausser den gesamten Wald präventiv zu roden, damit erst gar kein Flächenbrand entsteht? Die Sinnlosigkeit bzw. der Widerspruch dieses Vorhabens ist offensichtlich!
Aber die Waldbrandfrage ist gar nicht so weit von der Systemfrage entfernt.
Ein System darf nicht statisch sein, weil es sonst bei der Abweichung auch nur eines Parameters zwangsläufig zum Crash kommt. In unserem derzeitigen System haben wir mindestens 2 statische, und damit systemtödliche Parameter: 1. der Zinseszins und 2. die Unverwüstlichkeit von Schulden. Beide Faktoren sind aber gleichzeitig genau DIE Säulen, die die Ausübung von Macht erst ermöglichen und dabei eigentlich für den Fortbestand des Systems gar nicht notwendig sind. On the contrary.
Die sich hier schon förmlich aufdrängende Zwischenschlussfolgerung, dass die Ausübung von Macht in jedem Falle zum Crash führt mag zwar schön plakativ und auf einer gewissen Ebene auf folgerichtig sein, bringt uns aber auch nicht wirklich weiter, da ich davon ausgehe, dass gerade unsere Spezies ohne Grundstrukturen nicht überlebensfähig ist.
Im Gegensatz zum Wald, der sich nur durch biologische Interaktionsgesetze entwickeln und auch erhalten kann (und der auf dieser Basis übrigens nen Waldbrand von Zeit zu Zeit gar nicht mal so übel findet).
Also muss ein System dynamische Funktionselemente enthalten. Und genau hier fangen die Probleme an. Es gibt schlicht kein “perfektes” System. Völlig egal, wie viele Kontrollebenen, Checks & Balances, Entscheidungsüberprüfungen nach bestimmten Zeitspannen und wasweissichnochalles man in dieses System einfügt, über den Faktor Zeit wird JEDES System seiner gutartigen Intention beraubt und in ein Krebsgeschwür verwandelt. Step by step. Always!
Wie sinnlos erscheint doch aus heutiger Sicht das Hauptmotiv des amerikanischen Unabhängigkeitskrieges, sich aus einem (kolonialen) Schuldystem zu lösen, wie absurd erscheint die christliche Religion, wenn sie von einer Machtkrake namens Vatikan mit all seiner verlogenen Heuchelei auf allen Ebenen gelenkt wird, wie pervertiert ist denn heute die Idee der “sozialen” Marktwirtschaft hierzulande aus aktuellem Blickwinkel?
Und alle Änderungen, die an den Systemen vorgenommen wurden und werden, sind mitnichten “alternativlos” oder gezwungenermaßen im Kontext des Zeitgeistes bzw. Zeitgeschehens.
Der Vorteil aus den getätigten Systemanpassungen spielt in der Realität IMMER und einzig DEN Interessensgruppen in die Hände, deren Strukturen darauf ausgelegt sind, die eigenen Vorteile zum Schaden der Masse durchzusetzen. Und dies auch über die eigene Lebensspanne hinaus.
Also our derzeitges, in its basic structures soon 400-year old financial system actually knows corrective factors. These are used primarily to keep the money in motion, which is just as vital to the system, as for the (bio) system "living beings". Such factors are eg inheritance and wealth taxes to mitigate the harmful accumulation of great wealth system (see FIG. Local congestion) at least.
How easy it is to overturn such not only useful, but systemically important rules you have seen in this country for example, red and green.
Who has benefited? The usual suspects: the dynasties and their lackeys. On this simple, mechanical level, corrupted EVERY system on time itself, for alleged short-term benefit of a few.
Man is therefore not just an inherently "good", but rather stupid and self-destructive. The supposed crown of creation is dumber than any forest in truth.
The financial market (a perversion in itself !!!) is without strict regulation nor viable (who would argue with that just today?) As the road without traffic regulations.
Just by the supposed intellectual superiority of the human species in relation to its environment are essential complex rules. In its own interest.
This finding is far from new, but the man has always lived with the attitude that rules are there to be broken. It really is human. Everyone breaks rules. Point.
Man would indeed be a rational being, it would not need rules and laws. QED
We were in Europe for a time between 11xx and 14xx, in the predominant one umlaufbesichertes Geldystem. Was a class time. Nearly 300 years of "relative" peace, prosperity and flourishing towns (start-ups).
The centerpiece was a kind of annual fee on the money, which had ensured that the money remained in circulation and was not hoarded meaningless. From this time, incidentally, almost all cathedrals and minsters UDG come
At the end of this system was brought down, in which this "fee" was so screwed perverse high that the system had to collapse (hello church). Again, one can ask: Cui bono? And ... come to the same answer as always: Dynastic structures
What followed was the so-called. Dark Ages with Inquisition, a lot of wars and more wars and all side effects.
About the need for war financing then arose downstream as a consequence our present money system, were virtualized in the values by the privatization of money creation law. (Yes, ok, strengthens shortened reproduced - but so roughly).
Return to system problems.
Dynasties exist BECAUSE they break the rules of interpersonal cohabitation, turn, pervert and take advantage of the mass on shameful and malicious manner.
You can also NEVER be a billionaire, if you stick to ethical and moral liabilities. IT! GO! SIMPLE! NOT!
Dynastic behavior is not unlike computer viruses. Jeder Virus der erfolgreich vom System entfernt wurde, wird irgendwann durch einen anderen ersetzt, der die dann installierten Abwehrmechanismen für den vorhergehenden Virus umgeht. Alles eine Frage der Zeit.
Und dynastisches Verhalten dient lediglich dem Selbstzweck und zum Schaden des Systems.
Da die dynatische Ebene das Primär(=Geld-)system kontrolliert, und selbst die Ebene der Schutzmechanismen diesem System untergeordnet, und diese Schutzmechanismen damit wirkungslos sind, sehe ich unterm Strich keine brauchbare Alternative zum regelmäßgen Friseurtermin bzw. zur Brandschneisse.
Denn eher löst sich ein Krebsgeschwür ob der Erkenntnis seiner eigenen Schädlichkeit in Wohlgefallen auf, als dass sich existenzielle Ausrichtung der dynastischen Ebene aus Vernunft auch nur ein Muckasäckale weit verändert.
Natürlich ist das ein philosophischer Widerspruch.
Aber hey, ist das Leben nicht voller Widersprüche???
Ich esse einen Apfel… wegen der vielen Vitamine… und danach rauch ich eine ;-)
That´s life.
Widersprüche werden durch Kompromisse aufgelöst bzw. abgemildert.
Und mit dem Kompromiss, wenn ich schon in einem vorsätzlich fehlerhaften System leben muss, weil es schlicht kein perfektes System gibt, und deshalb von Zeit zu Zeit ein paar hundert Oligarchen weltweit zum Friseur zu schicken, damit der Rest der Gattung nicht gänzlich über den Tisch gezogen wird, damit kann ich leben.
Meine Philosophie übrigens auch.
Sorry Magnus, ist mal wieder länger geworden, aber ich krieg das einfach nicht in 3 Absätzen hin ;-)
@ JaNeIsKlar
Dein umfässlicher Kommentar ist zwar keineswegs “zu schade” für diesen Strang, wäre es aber allemal wert, darüber hinaus hier als eigenständiger (vielleicht gar erweiterter?) Gastbeitrag zu erscheinen.
Ich werde deshalb jetzt auch erstmal selber nichts dazu sagen.
Wenn Du es in Ordnung findest, dass ich ihn hier einstelle (oder eine erweiterte Fassung, sei es unter Klarnamen, sei es unter Nick; letzterenfalls müsste aber zumindest ich Deinen Klarnamen erfahren), dann rufe mich doch bitte der Modalitäten halber an.
Auch natürlich, damit wir eine geeignete, knackige Überschrift finden, ich Dir eine überarbeitete Version (keine Sorge, allenfalls ein paar kleine Korrekturen, die ich Dir epostalisch vorschlüge und nur entlang Deiner Freigabe anbrächte) zukommen lassen kann.
I would be delighted!
@ Dude
Ich bitte um Dein Verständnis, dass ich…