Earlier, someone told me its judgment otherwise counts for me, it'm going with all writing (my self and just at that) to "balance".
He said there are two Felos well with me.
His thing was, just said that you can be better on every item out of is hard, sometimes should bring a return, the mollified tempers, shows that it was not a total monster.
The idea is understandable, apparently not wrong: but it is still fundamentally wrong.
Ultimately it boils down to that one - no, the "you" I do not know, and it was also I meant - repeatedly had to curry favor in it.
So between bargain distribute sugared cotton buds, so that you can then unpack its small Knittelchen again, without having to attract any attention as manic Dauerstinksiefel.
So philosophy does not work.
Yes, I show my readers also like to have, can be as I would like. Quite simply because I'm also fond of happy times and am generally for love and really just loving anyway.
I do not write but love to speak to apologize for the necessary hardness.
So I then weighed again must say hard.
In this way, the word "eye waves awareness" into a synonym for the pussyfooting of Minden, who does not even trust himself to Hundsbrunzer. Nietzsche would have just laughed.
I would now like, "balanced" out, even "tolerant" (tolerating everything), "cosmopolitan" (each enddumm Salafistierten welcoming), "modern" (that is mediocre at best) be?
That will not happen to me. For I have looked deeper into the Word than ever into the glass. (Not that I would only ever been lazy in the latter. I know even now how to drink a Achtele and thereat falls from the chair immediately.)
Puck thing is that one holds, I hurt my (legitimate) things yes, as I vorbrächte they too German and clear. Too little homeopathic I administered my unwitzhaften doses. The vertrüge modern man now times not, so I maneuvered myself only marginalized, discredited my theses.
On this glue I do not crawl.
Theses should therefore be discredited, be that to set it up directly and clearly and teacher?
These poor creatures can help you only to dim light, by all or any professionally offended having always careful in their eyes, a little slimes and creeps and salbadert so that no one notices, then somehow gradually but should remember what you have to say?
Here we come to the mechanism that works on that now almost all the rest so cowardly as to keep themselves.
"Yes, you will secretly yes some agree, but so hard, directly and roughly how you do that, open at the end no one!"
I do not give a damn if no one dares more, I agree with disclosed. Though he may rub the rest of his ass in his Esoklub. He will not even bring it up anyway to a stink that still smelled even one of his Mitdécandents.
While half the world is burnt from last humanly possible rabble, should I just show in my lyrics "balance"?
Haha.
If one has me even worse jokes in stock?
- Ads -
Tags: Idiotenkabinatt
Your problem is not the fact that you are concerned about certain things and trying to fathom, perhaps also to explain yourself. Your problem is that you then want to take your opinion over the rest of society by enabling the rest mostly insulting.
There are perfectly good reasons for some of your arguments but you're not the only one doing the worrying about the Surrounding. Everyone has to understand one's own head and tried the world.
It may be that in your eyes, many are on the wrong track. But honestly, you have not all the explanatory answer. You reflect only your ideas. Maybe, but you're right can also be that you're totally on the wrong end.
It's a little like this stupid statement: evidence that there is a God, there is not but not the opposite also.
Well, everyone has his arguments but one must therefore always equal to offend?
To be angry about it, that is not any of your view, is a little like playing the abused child in kindergarten. But it does not demonstrate a solid, well-bottomed position.
There is certainly a reason that many people, whether educated or not, still want to believe in something that does not match your world view.
Whether they are hoping for help in case of illness or even ascribe courage, because they do not want to be alone in your misery. Or just because they so want it, because it gives your life meaning.
To be honest, I have nothing against people who believe in a God or whatever. I'm rather against those that do take advantage of to get people to move to action, you do not want to presume a living. The then always with a view of things, which does not allow different opinion.
So how do you stop allowing no other opinion. You then call not necessarily to murder and manslaughter on but you're insulting and just not convince with the strength of the arguments. In addition, you'd never admit defeat, even if others have quite a reasonable explanation, to certain things which you see just different.
Always true to the motto, there may be nothing I can not grasp or see. Everyone is different and since than I, is a daft idiot without a brain in his little neck coverage teach.
@ I
Thank you for your contribution.
It is good if people like you are offended first.
Because then they would like to start the purposeful thinking.