I would first of all on the previous article ' Writing "For Our Time ' 'out of it was a little more effort, or just some help, even the German-speaking should be indecipherable, so here is directly repeating nothing of there Illustrated.
Now it's about things that Englischsprachige usually do not hear much less want to record, because they qualify for English simple (exceptions; I can be malicious, love Anglo-Saxons, because you still bombed my country, my compatriots, my language whim, for funs) is all that is English.
So that etymology is a funny little playground for a few linguists in Oxbridge is, but otherwise a vain field of activity, as all the world's languages have already given the runaround controls on the English to serve as eunuchs until that this obtains its supposed self-evident global omnipotence have, predestined by God ingested.
Who unwilling to pay already determined by its origin the single word, is merely write intuitively. Some can, confessed, still pretty good.
Nevertheless, the study of the word development is through the languages and times a Ausbildungsbehuf the weightiest kind; not only to recognize and use deep layers of semantics to, but also whether the Zersprechfähigkeit against those who drive to übelen purposes loose with their own language, so you wiser as to the freezing point counter to empower.
This then conveyed, moreover, the critical examination of their own intuition. The so-called intuition is in fact often a fallacy simply a child experienced, deep sunken manipulation. Who blind trusts his intuition, is as much a goal as the one who wants nothing, absolutely nothing about her to know.
On the literal and conceptual level, there is also because, apart from other exact Hinlesen and Hinhorchen, no better exercise for the study of word origins and development, namely the etymology.
Based on their entire epochs can be mentally decipher. It is one of the most important of the many archduchesses the queen of the sciences.
You laugh if this pathos?
Then you look at only me, how from pathos to German suffering (company), in a roundabout way, Deceitful semantic sidedness of a religious nature, the only way was made to salvation.
To the words "religion" I say nothing, because otherwise some people get upset again senselessly. (Because they know as much is still attached, not even, or what they should tie back to who to call it or him or her or the indefinable The then stop "Divine Source", "proto-one", "Urkeinheit", "Big Bang "etc., to fascinate all those who bring to silence that such not necessarily deny, but simply overwhelm even by an approximate any chatter, let entworten.)
Do not let entworten you.
Erwortet you.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Entwortung , etymology
Great, now I have fought my way through this text and wonder what you really want to say?
If you to educate your children to eat with a knife and fork, which is then in your eyes or manipulation but rather an education to a certain lifestyle, a social level, or - worse still - consensus? In general, you should ask yourself the question, what is quite simply at your education your own manipulation? If you want your children partout Keep away from God and faith, then you also pressing them on your mark and educate them as little to so-called free-thinkers - whatever that may be - like other parents do or do not do, religious or not.
Personally, I think a lot of instinct, the gut feeling of intuition. In particular, after I suffered shipwreck much more than I have not exactly heard it. I have instead on clever translucent arguments heard arguing against myself, although I felt the ground shake under my feet.
I think, rather, that it is the education to instinct or the drawing But any kind of natural instinct us more harm than good in society on a broad front to even more parroting to more susceptibility to propaganda leads. But where is the difference between your and other propaganda? I do not see any major. Sometimes I have to agree, sometimes not. Where do you get your claim to absoluteness, the ne plus ultra, the only true answer?
When I look at myself otherwise your recent texts on religion, God, the evil British and other round envelopes, then I wonder if you could get by in this life without the enemy? I doubt it now and wonder why that is?
It beckons with obvious double roof damage (love and religious)
the bookmark
@ Bookmarks
I want my children partout Keep away from God and faith and do not either. That you have invented you.
Furthermore, I voted in no way against intuition.
In addition, I need no enemy, not even God or English.
I expect even less that someone is reading accurately and fairly understand what I write.
No matter in what language.
Normally, this would be my whole answer.
But as you are, so requests here, I'll more detail.
Have you ever thought, why am I doing all this?
Only to inflate me and to cull about me?
To give the world the bad example of an openly professing to wayward? (That would be at least ever was.)
From a special form of sadomasochism 'out?
Do you think I did not know how much of what I write, act on many, many may seem?
Why do I do it just right?
Who does not look like much - yes, now I take the word vernutzte ago - Love is in it?
Stupid question. No, a rhetorical question a sham.
Of course most do not see.
How should she can.
I'm not so presumptuous to expect or even believe that they could to me.
They are far too busy with the respectively "random" part, statements busy.
This is normal.
As a modern Krämer I said it was "priced in".
Nevertheless, finds the one or the other here sometimes a seed.
And what might be the one a seed that may seem to others only as a nuisance, even evil vulgarity.
I know that.
That's how I want it.
I do not work as a slave by Springer and Burda.
There, one can expect, what you expect.
@ Bookmarks
Supplement
I will, of course, much more.
Magnus, I do not doubt your good intentions. I just sometimes feel that you overshoot the target and then thus reach the opposite of what you really wanted.
To be drastically sometimes is quite an effective way, but not always and everywhere and at any time. Why do you make it for yourself so hard?
We are constantly subject to any tampering attempts and it is right to point our children to it. But, as we have gone our way and come to our own findings or results of thinking, it will keep our children too and that's a good thing. Where we do not have access and that's even better. They are what we give them to pick up, and re-evaluate for themselves, take things and also reject another. You will also reject things, views and insights that we had grown fond of that cost us hard ways of knowing.
But just as we kiss Edison, when the lights go on, so little they will take on things, views, insights, behaviors of us if they do not fit into their life structure, or the new life must be adjusted.
There are "eternal values", but also the first to be reconsidered before they are adopted.
We gain nothing if we tell the rest of the world to idiots.
@ Bookmarks
First, even to your previous comment.
I told my eleven year olds that you now reproach myself, I have him and his brother partout (the word I had to explain) away from the faith and will prevent them from God and still acted in such a direction.
He just laughed and said that I even let him go his time without further in this mind-numbing religious instruction and confirmed to me that I have never taken action against God and faith (as, usually with believers who tell their children they would believe).
You may continue to see it so that I hinausschösse about the target. May sometimes be so. But at least I still shoot. Purely verbal. In contrast to the majority of most of the remainder.
I do not explain also the rest of the world to idiots. But tell very well to many that they do pray tell would start times with the independent thinking. And that is founded often, because otherwise they hear nothing except the pastor and the announcer and Anne Will, quite dramatically, but not unrealistic, because the tattered by drone strikes children there as well as the Euro-Lug and -Wahnsinn.
It seems to me here is again the bearer of bad real March are slaughtered, because that one would prefer the murderer and Volksaussauger accountable.
You've certainly not one grain to the effect convinced me that in terms of a whispering softness, the Weichspülerei the systematic cruelty of those who arrange such a daily basis in reality and commit something changed me.
The Deibel I'll do.
By reactions such as your I feel rather as confirmed on the right track.
Because if what I say already solid faith of your people corrodes format, it can be almost the only way and correct.
So if you think that an exaggeration, then please get to Barack Hussein Obama. The day can kill innocent people.
I do not.
But I say it because of me and then I just substitute the first asshole.
Magnus, religious education is usually boring and if you ask me, a more or less superfluous Laber compartment. There you can easily get at least a three without lie down especially to the wheel a few times with fingers high. Religious education does not lead to faith to faith can not educate and certainly not teach you.
You are requesting to for you to think. I like that. Less well I think this then only so long will your consent, as long as the result is on your line. If not, then the other is after all the idiot. Therefore, your children would not stand a chance with you, they should develop at once a belief or go in a direction that is not yours. If it is so, they will simply not tell you.
Because I can have a say in so far pretty good, because I have a highly talented and extremely talented father, who was filling the room as a personality that others only there was room on the wall.
What bothers me less that you clear your mind extremely. What bothers me is your lack of distance. One can formulate the things one way or another.
@ Bookmarks
Now you ask me, even under a kind of anti-religious domestic tyranny.
And who profit oriented - General! - Was not in my line, will simply stamped by me as an idiot.
Resist the former I will not defend myself, I will bring neither a compelling rebuttal still could.
The second assertion: Here there is a compelling rebuttal by the numerous discussions in which I participated on this page. Where I usually insists, but also often acknowledged've often corrected.
And, moreover, even insults and insinuations, curses, all sorts of threats at least allowed to rule, but rather leading back to the topic, because paying back with similar coin, possibly sarcastic, yes, well, answered.
Whether you just the consequences of my (alleged) wished blasphemies to the neck, regretted that you've not been skinned alive, curses tried me tried to pose as narcissistic egomaniac, freaked, because I once again something not sufficiently took seriously, or you to me just now, in complete ignorance to seal the fanatically anti-religious awful dictator is doing.
And since, taken the latter approach, you're talking about distance.
I will not name now, what I strongly suspect that you might like to such harsh speech pushes against me.
For I will, even if you appear below deck name, although you this kind of reproach me as a public figure, do not say here.
But that this would your behavior have two main grounds on which you can surely come, when you think about it.
Supplement
(I noticed just that there are probably three reasons.)
Magnus, your expression inspires me and stimulates. In the case of the divergent findings mean she is also capable of more teasing than in unguided language carelessly gekleckerte arguments.
Right here ... no, I do not want to keep him, but to share with everyone, an Out of the exemplary role of your texts seems to me worth mentioning:
... But also whether the Zersprechfähigkeit against those who drive to übelen purposes loose with their own language, so you wiser as to the freezing point counter to empower themselves.
The "to" indicated wrongly indicates a non forth herein progress of your sentence.
One more thing: Few of Netnews messages can be based on their title the author or assign a page, and then usually by the views too familiar latter. Your entries reveal the author through their linguistic quality. This depresses me.
@ Info Liner
Schockschwerenot! Whether your formulation critical throw I thought just spontaneously, only having the purpose specified by you part of me that I once not only a fashionable letter, but even a necessary word would not have fallen into the set, which indeed just here certainly should not have happened ,
I quote again the whole sentence:
"However, the study of the word development is through the languages and times a Ausbildungsbehuf the weightiest kind; not only to recognize and use deep layers of semantics to, but also whether the Zersprechfähigkeit against those who loose with their own language to drive übelen purposes, therefore wiser as to the freezing point confront them to empower themselves. "
Admittedly, the set is in spite of its relative (by my standards) shortly some nested by the terminal-to Infinitivteil after insertion does not seem out properly but he still hangs at the top "to".
That may be ventured something, and I thank you for the hint, but I let it stand uncorrected so.
And of course I am very pleased that you goutierst what I'm doing.
To Net Express News: Because I can tease out a privilege to me, did not want that too, insofar as I could of Use.
The blog is called now times "unzensiert.zeitgeist-online.de", that bears my name in the title.
It also told me already people very directly that I was a bit silly to have the configured otherwise.
Might be. But now it is so, and I'm glad to see the NNE always a platform that is so open to let also present things, not only in the political sense not the major media, but also in other ways, such as Also, the above post.
One or the other reads then still more, perhaps remains "stuck" with me.
Remember, please, that texts like the above that should probably less than one percent seriously interested, the ever want to read even more challenging. I am of this, it had three percent, well aware of and honored therefore and well taken care of, that is at all These kinds used in such a multiplication.
The sheep media - with the laudable and me also praised exceptions - just sheep media, and since I hot as they are made to feel, is of course not the same as rolled out to me there is a red carpet.
But I am - without any clear evidence - convinced that some of the best of the journalists that inwischen for me at least and discover on secretly, intentionally, unless they happen herführt the search engine.
I have stayed here several times Argue about how to read a lot, even and especially in the "alternative" blogosphere, think I've captured very well: but I will arrange neither my subjects, nor my statements, not even my style this Behufe below.
Desfalls I would certainly be more nominal success, money order would certainly clean more than just easier, but I have decided.
A conundrum still in the end: Do you mean that I would not be able to write any popular mass crap?
It fell to me at the beginning probably not easy, since you also have to get used to the effect itself. Too Difficult, however, it would not.
LG
Magnus
What a primitive handle to try to answer a riddle, and yet: Yes, I am convinced that you were not able to write popular mass crap, because you would have to tell you himself. I ask again to be understood as recognition, as well as my previous concluding sentence where I wanted to know expressed that your texts do not need a reference for the origin because they (unfortunately!) Lonely standing there in her power of speech, so therefore uniquely identifiable are. It was perhaps a little mischievous, not to continue to perform there and to provoke misunderstanding, but the game is not to understand me just strange and sharpens the senses in a broader sense.
How many read or understand your explanations, I meaningless, because the design forces therein take effect regardless of the "100 Monkeys". To me they are like food, if not sarcasm or other Ungeläutertheiten Pate were incurred.
@ Info Liner
Ungeläuterheiten there is no doubt genung with me (in the non-Christian sense), and I try not to hide those already from the outset: Sarcasm is but not per se constitute Ungeläutertheit.
I also like to play, just not about money in the material at most about who has to spend the other a cognac or a case of beer or a bottle of sparkling wine good location.