Having recently - little wonder - could show that religiosity stupid, obliterated all parts of the brain, we must now according to this article to determine with as little surprise that the same is true for falling in love.
It may, of course, many wissenschaftsabholden Thomas did not like that dementia is not just; not that religiosity in their symptoms similar to being in love so that you have to watch these two mental illnesses as the closest related.
The difference between the two forms of expression of the typical to be diagnosed brain damage seems only to be that in one case an Existing (one available) is worshiped, in the other case only one suspected to Existing.
In-depth comparative studies are probably still outstanding. The assumption that both states of cerebral dysfunction have similar causes such effects, is in any case next.
Whether being in love the less dangerous form of the disease was by passes often not chronic (but just more often, changing lust objects owed, recurrent acute), is still far from clear. Because the yo-yo effect of being in love should be measured at least not to the action of a just steadily, so angewöhnbaren better herewith the system more compatible brain damaging faith underestimated.
Many have probably tried and therefore from their infatuation seizures, save in the religion. The literature is full of examples of this.
Modulating the same stupid is finally more bearable, as times extremely stupid, then, apparently recovered, again less, then all the more worse.
One might even go so far as religiosity, yes the mass affects our something wrapped under way, to be described as a kind of Erstatzverliebtheit. So even seen as relatively healthy. So in about the grenades quarter brandy drunkard comparable, the switching to a few regulated after work beers.
God or gods, belief in something tangible not any, offer the incomparable advantage that you never have to feel clearly rejected themselves. We must always trust that you will also have liked.
If I were God, or something like that, an alien psycho-Abschakal z. Example, that his life energy can merely exist to draw solely from human weaknesses, so I would have liked the fact wofern recognized (it would me desfalls well as be trusted, as now, certainly not made as God) advantage.
And from my satraps, the prophets and priests, to submit the necessary per scriptures entsrechend and can proclaim.
The celibacy, circumcision, monasteries etc. can greet.
I have this text stored by the way just for fun under the heading "satire".
- Advertisement -
Tags: Gay Science
Magnus
Look, kid, with your absolutizing (so as not to have to tell absolutist, like the Bibelprophetenspastzennazis - shit, now ego've even told you.) Tirades here, otherwise you vergraulst so you probably have a few more than you would love ...
Even Nietzsche would have if such thin whistle only scratched his beard!
Yes, You do not know me, but that had to be said now times!
Look out! Be aware you whether the damage to you anrichtest to have possibly not considered it thoroughly ...
Remember that you do not want to even be on jackal, or mislead me?
Dude'sche greetings from the holistic nihilism in God consciousness.
Ps. Explanations for this my rumbling here, this flat hand claps you by my side with full force on the cheek, you do not find in the other lanes ... You already know where ...
Pps. "Companions sought once the creator and children of his hope: and, behold, it was found that he could not find them, unless he creates himself only ..."
Greetings from Friedrich!
PPPs. If the only effect of the coronal mass ejection from Saturday, is hereby forgiven you.
@ Dude
I will answer this your unspecified accusations that also still contain threats, not content now, especially since I so would have me then reinvent yourself, to what.
If you vorbringst specific criticisms, I will deal with it, of course.
What you just rides, whether a solar storm, or whatever, I do not know.
You can add me but, well then, continue to attack factually unfounded.
I do not mind and will continue to have space here, as long as the laws of my country are not against it.
And, these are my own house rules here, not permanently leaves the level down, which I expect here by all as Mindestes.
Some more advice: Check times your sore spots and how I like it might have taken.
You stay here, despite your statements above, which I think is partially derailed quite welcome. You've been here a lot, often contributed exceptionally stimulating and fruitful, Postgraduate, I will not forget nor ex post at least ask, things between us wofern should not come right back.
Well, then ...
"Having recently - have shown that religiosity stupid, desolate whole brain games, ... - little surprise"
"... Not that religiosity in their symptoms ..."
"... Have to look at mental illness as the closest related."
"... The typical to be diagnosed brain damage ..."
"... The cerebral dysfunction ..."
"... The less dangerous form of the disease ..."
"Modulating the same stupid is finally more bearable ..."
"If I were God, or something like that, an alien psycho-Abschakal z. Example, that his life energy can merely exist to draw solely from human weaknesses ..."
As you can see, I almost can quote the entire absolutist drivel here.
You know how I stand for true Religio, which, beyond abrahmitischen, koran rule, Hindu, Lamaist, atheistic, materialistic faith institutions, whose temples and gurus, and all the other horrors of free spirits, confident, with activated brain and heart in symbiosis moved according to the individual and unique Religio out back to the source of all being and life - God; and with IHMIHR.
You know that I consider it the essence of being within the multidimensional space-time paradox at all.
You also know that You are my Master, I very highly respect and appreciate, and I am also grateful to you thereat.
Only you forgetting apparently (refer to the above texts), and fail to recognize that the one I would not know exactly what you you wishest, if I were here just after dachshunds blindly.
But you know well that this is not anyway you could succeed with me, what a clever feints You also ausdächtest for you ...
You insult in These kinds texts in absolutistischster manner - the Catholic priest in the pulpit same - how any honorable and respectful individual (even if its not too many out there are still some read along here on ...), which is the holistic, individual Religio beyond diabolical Kunstrukten and structures prescribed, and vergraulst they possibly top at all yet!
You notice seemingly not think I'm as you master how you me, because even though I'm your protégé, so you are also mine.
Greetings from Enraged.
. Ps If you like this is now contrary to, nor an advice: Check times your house rules here ...;) (because the level was first class!)
@ Magnus
I know of no other person who is more in love with himself, than you are.
I agree with the said at what dude.
If you want to be Magnus Your own God, this is your beer. But let other please the freedom to be allowed to choose their God without being thereby designated by you as insane.
You say, "That does not bother me and will continue to have space here, as long as the laws of my country not stand against it."
Which country do you mean - the thing party dictatorship construct BRD?
What do you mean, the laws and all the other additional tens regulations in your beautiful country can really exist before God?
The Messenger of Him who said:
John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and what your father desires, you want to do; who was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it.
Who of God is nothing, of course, can not know even his highest bid.
Luke 6:31 And as ye would that men should do to you, do also to them likewise.
@ Dude
I do not know what you are doing here for fat cheeks.
I'm certainly also of the view that the Religious who is looking for a God on the outside, instead of there to behold the mirror lived own inner divinity, can face the disease of being in love.
Being myself the unglücklichst lovers, so the representative of the most severe form of this type psychosis, yet by far is better than all the veal, sheep and Sonstwasanbeter:
This is aimed as a last resort usually only themselves, those organized religious wars.
It may be that the above allopathic text for Religiotiker is too heavy gun, but none is so forced to take it. Especially in this pharmacy also quite fine-material medicines are available.
So: Always nice to stay in the middle!
@ Jochen
First, I have "the laws of my country" merely meant that one here, although I may wish, for example, skinned (which has not done dude), but not another. Alswelches I legally for totally believe in order. What laws of my country I did not like, otherwise you can find out easily with little effort.
If I am your knowledge and opinion, narcissistic than any other, I consider that in the context of the above text as praise.
That you one verse of John against me think that yes should mean nothing other than that I was the devil (or can not I just read that right - may be ...) I am not surprised.
You fulfill so namely - though so far not palpable, what then would not only be against the sensible laws of my country, but also against my - Rainer's words. (One may also assume confidently that you had to use a quotation from the Bible, because you yourself not capable or brave enough, or both, were you to bring similar own, trying to show me the way to your hell here.)
I am not going for my "allopathic" with safety apologize text, because he was conceived from the beginning as it obviously works also great.
Moreover, I have neither you nor mentioned above directly Dude: You have you felt but apparently addressed in the most unfavorable way.
Why, about your vermochtet obviously in your holy indignation not think. What not a proof, but nevertheless is still an unmistakable indication that I'm right.
Furthermore, I can tell you that I know of one other person whose self-love, as you call it, I have not yet achieved consistently or even overtaking him in it.
I can tell you but ever betrayed (like to guess easily) that he still found neither in the Bible was otherwise a priest.
Ultimately: who wants only add paint, which will hear the mass expected to write when holding it to be appropriate for the tabloids.
There are word for adult knowledge wills.
Rainer
It's about the totalizing judgment in the formulations that anyone who is committed to the true Religio, equates with the faithful stupid wieners pale world religions and sects me.
All materialistic atheists should be something more to God - Align, because philosophy without Religio is just as one-sided, harmful, lame and bland, like religion without philosophy - the source!
If he had, etc. of the "followers of the dim, man-made, secular hierarchical religious constructs" spoken, I would have to say Hiezu nothing. But that will not do!
Greetings from Dude
@ Dude
"You insult in These kinds texts in absolutistischster manner - the Catholic priest in the pulpit same - how any honorable and respectful individual (even if its not too many out there are still some read along here on ...), which is the holistic, individual Religio beyond prescribed by diabolical Kunstrukten and structures, and vergraulst they possibly top at all yet! "
First, people who are in the sense in which I have "Religio" yet understood at you certainly "offended" not one of them stupid or hybrisgeschwängerten Goeller text. The come here most criticism, with rebuttals, relevant references, but not with such fury, that is uncoordinated, therefore.
Are you - secondly - ever occurred to me that I could possibly be closer to a Religio, as you proclaim it to live always, as you?
Have you - thirdly - ever considered how your distinctive area put forward stirred anger?
Fourth, even pulled some thoughtful conclusion from this?
Then, just as an example, as Tanya and Rainer and I sometimes to verwagen your real name open?
Or just because that would be asking too much probably, at least initially, somewhat less pompously of your supposedly already achieved existent allerfüllenden Religio talking?
Not humble, not modest, but perhaps a bit more moderate in the best sense of measure?
If you - so I am now speaking Jochen again to - ever, certainly to refer to this discussion, noticed, in which rather rare degree I am questioning again and again, my weaknesses all over the world, they wofern they will perceive, see?
And then, as I do not break down under them (does that - well, let's take the time not too literally), comes Jochen, approvingly, because of the above text with John luggage, which the devil is you?
As your companion of the Holy Most High?
Why should I use something really serious yet?
This last question at least I can answer you.
I take it therefore not (yet) seriously because major parts of humanity are still religious zealots. Which, this Salafistenschwachköpfe are only one example of each and every sense of humor is lost, as Rainer earned it here, prone to violence, "offended" when running them anything against their super top sand-engine, totally loving Religio peace.
Maybe I should not take seriously something really. But it is obvious there, and it will not stop my and threaten other children and abuse, only because I no longer erstnähme it.
So I have to "Maybe" and delete it seriously but just that. Ignore not only namely does not help.
Best wishes from one neither Enraged still horrified.
@ Dude
I have only just - found your answer to Rainer - after writing my earlier to you.
I know very well that he can speak for himself, now give my two cents but still, anticipating him, also.
The input text is a tough, provocative Wachrütteltext in which I very much intentionally left implicit in the act and maybe not just applied the toe nail file. I know, in fact, a few people, I have also mentioned more often, which does not seem to cloud the brain shape of the "Religio". With whom I converse also always happy, and we laugh a lot.
But Jochen and you have my opinion just here demonstrates what I asked. The rest is explained above.
Dear Magnus
I will later, after dinner, go in more detail on your suggestions, but I will now advance only once a statement contribute here (not by me, but with my views up on last Yota almost identical), I mitliest anyone here explicitly want to commend to the heart.
http://www.allmystery.de/themen/np88057-1#id7813422
Kind regards from Dude
After my last supper is a bit lush, as planned, here now, somewhat belatedly, yet the promised response.
"First, people who are in the sense that I" Religio "have understood so far with you, certainly not one of them stupid or hybrisgeschwängerten Goeller text" "be." Offended
I do not, you are right, but others who have a holistic, spiritual and philosophical Religio not yet internalized, and all those who actually have this upright will to practice, you can get away with such absolutist bluster scare viciously, and, what would be worse, they do from their chosen path - which is the only targeted! - Divert again.
You know the sharpness of your blade, so use something swift and smooth!
"The come here most criticism, with rebuttals, relevant evidence"
I have everything already delivered ... see above ...
"Are you - secondly - ever occurred to me that I could possibly be closer to a Religio, as you proclaim it to live always as you?"
I'm not as, but yes, the thought came to me already, what also one of the main reasons for this was so, that I spoke unabashedly uncensored here to make you aware of the errors of the false absolutism.
You know, I am also not shy compared to praise you, but if something gets on my bag because it comes unjustified and utterly idiotic inflammatory by ramblings, then I do not mind, you clearly say so.
Or are you out God as the source of all being and life, as an absolute individual who forever bears all relative individuals (souls / gods in God) in itself, really doubt aware? Mier's seems honestly did not then, and also your articles and comments can be like nothing seen.
"Third" and "Fourth" are already answered with the above also.
On the subject of real names we have already discussed in detail. You can read my opinion in this regard in the relevant strands in my comments found. Somewhat difficult without comment search function, I know, so I do not even bother me ... who seek shall find, and who does not seek the easy intressiert not.
"Somewhat less pompously of your supposedly already achieved existent allerfüllenden Religio talking?
Not humble, not modest, but perhaps a bit more moderate in the best sense of measure? "
That may be a legitimate criticism to some extent.
We agree that I would give me the effect future trouble, and you stop it with unjustified, absolutist convictions of religiosity ...
Deal? :-P
"But it's obvious there, and it will not stop threatening my and other children and abuse, only because I no longer erstnähme it."
But do not forget here that the absolutist, atheist-materialist science religion - and thus naturally connected the educational uh, conditioning institutions in the world - your children, and still coming, bringing the much greater damage! Would you have by the way, this also installed in your slam, I would have said nothing.
And finally, again in no uncertain terms:
All this bluster on my part is in any way against you as a person - and I, I guess you too much, as a free-spirited, not forbid let forming the mouth-considered and deliberate, divine individual - but against the false absolutism, which, in the form, far more harm than they could be somehow useful.
So now I have said on this subject everything there is to say for me.
Peace!
@ Dude
I have - at least on your objections out - here also said all there was to say.
Peace be with you.