Will talk about the question of when diplomacy into a mask of cowardice, I would like to entertain me with Confucius. It drives me namely a long time to, and I would like the opinion of the wise Chinese people heard (otherwise, of course, Cervantes and Nietzsche asked).
How much truth (meant here in the sense of one's own point of view regarding a thing) must be "mitigated", omit, even embezzled, "only" for the sake of the bridge shock?
At what points corrupting itself, you will ultimately even a traitor, by seeking to defuse conflictive?
(For people who take seriously the Western astrology, I add explanatory that I - at least it explained at this level in the sense that to some extent - in this respect as a scale with ascendant lion and a Pluto-Uranus conjunction in the first house, which is also located in my real life, whether now often showed coincidence or not, often times with "the good guys", sometimes with "the evil" country, by not excluded times of balancing, sometimes takes the aspect of clarity in the foreground. Verbal thunderstorm. )
Certainly there are for solving this question is no panacea. But here milestones.
So I stand, just as an example (my family I leave now times outside before), for some time between two friends who fell out years ago, tend to be those times, then back to the other side, think to myself again and again that I my flag but too much hung in the wind.
Somehow both are right, and then again not. Finding a real middle and keep difficult. Not because I would totally do not fall on my head or on the mouth, but because both are not jerks, each leads usually well justified each his thing. (They are not really become hostile to happiness, but the nicks are not there ausgewatzt as there.)
So I have found myself often going to have the one side or the other but probably yielded too far, so both here and, strictly speaking, but somehow disloyal to have become even untruthful what manchesmal gnawed at me because I something not once can suffer from myself.
The simplest solution would of course, is through respective things to each other not to talk, because I entkäme this predicament: This is due to overweight but common themes and interests and activity areas simply not possible, at least not meaningful.
It will be the effect probably always watching, wondering, have to check.
If among you, dear readers, a successful reincarnation of the Master from ancient China are, or simply one anyway Kluger, the outgoing Council knows, so that would be something.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Confucius
No wonder that so far no one wrote anything. Could it be that discussions with the two offenders are not a problem as long as You have not emotionally Remove from yourself and hinbewegst to one of the sides? That would be a nice exercise, because like I also let myself every now and then on a consistent appearing in the first moment arguments and swim out away from the tedious (but worthwhile) business, continuing forever as own master.