Let's look at the word "False Flag" / "false flag" who has come in recent years in strong fashion, a closer look at:
English Wikipedia:
"False flag (aka Black Flag) operations are covert operations designed to deceive in seeking a way did the operations Appear as though They Are Carried out by other entities being."
In German (not entirely congruent):
"He (the term" false flag "Note from me.) Refers to a company that is supposedly done to conceal the identity and intentions of the actual originator of a third party."
Well, what are false flag operations, which are classical ones understood by everyone.
But what about a variant which is now subsumed by many also including: namely that, for example, an intelligence, a political assassination, terrorist attacks, etc. does not run itself and pushes the matter to an opponent in the shoes, but still much risk free, behind exaggerated , clever going on.
He can namely easily go in the way that he, knowing what bad guys as plan their mischief and driving, look away simply notes simply "sees" sometimes leaves completely run by mistake into space a few uninitiated stupid policemen, can be a lot of time in his work, a series of "breakdown" provides that plays three monkeys that things can happen, just allow.
It'll be an operation "false flag", as the performers actually're real?
We have to do it, so to speak, in this case with the type B of false flag operations?
Or do we need for a separate technical term?
Supplement (7 hours Inserted)
It is the one described above is not a subtype of stratagem of "false flag".
It says: Watching and shade.
Supplement II (25.2.)
You can stratagem that just yet regarded as a sub-form "Under False Flag", namely as "Indirect false flag". (See discussion and follow-up article.)
I ask you whether my fickleness relevant for forgiveness.
- Advertisement -
Tags: false flag type B , False Flag Operations , Indirect False Flag , Indirect false flag , false flag operations , terrorist , Toulouse , watching and shade
Thanks for your thoughts.
I think you can definitely classify such variants under the umbrella term "False Flag", even if it's actually not entirely correct.
Since the term is a little known but meanwhile, it also brings nothing here to kreiren a new term, just for everyone because you would have to explain about seven million times, so what you actually said; if one is ever asked .. ^^
For my discretion only a clarification would be necessary for such variants, such as: "Indirect False Flag" or "Passive False Flag". The latter I think is the better option as it hits the nail on the head.
The problem is that there is probably some overlap, ie a passive attack is not really passive if, for example, of "state institutions" (intelligence and co.) From the hidden background out massively be given support, it was just before air travel allow without risking "preventive detention", or even cash flows (or weapons) that would otherwise hardly came in today's surveillance society, attention-grabbing and resistance to allow flow to the tool, or to ensure that the attention of the planetary civil society yes is not very focused on dubious organization, and much more.
Depending on the intensity of aid from the background one can again not really speak of a passive action so in certain cases.
However, I do have long nachgesinnt about it, and I know of no better term occurred.
Perhaps still puts a / r Gold egg in this regard here. :-)
Best regards
@ Dude
Thanks for the suggestions! - But I think that "Indirect False Flag" or "Indirect false flag" the better your suggestions.
"Passive False Flag" or "Passive false flag" seems a bit misleading and not entirely accurate, as happened originating party - I like the thing with the help (I call the name if I granted that) as a "watch and shade" try looking benamte - not only can happen, but also shaded in the process and then shaded the "Declaration" operations, also quite active assistance of the kind described by you making so that the coup really hinhaut.
Since "False Flag" is an established, well-known expression, "Indirect False Flag" the cause and procedure describes very well, this combination is not yet clear choice for me.
I've just times the Google asked: This finding you can attach you the lapel.
That I did not come to this so incredibly simple like true solution myself ... sob.
I'll set it right now as complementary products keyword.
Thank you!
@ Dude
I think we definitely make a work of potentially significant implications here. Humans perceive a thing, a process often only accurate and really be relevant if he has an understandable term for it.
Furthermore, it is indeed also that imprecise terms confuse and also offer skeptics as "Verschattern" attack all kinds of surfaces such as on display.
In this course, I know that we will not take seriously a lot herein as they we catch a reflex than a useless sham or as a vain baking inflation dismiss what. But these are very likely those who are not able to see, want to see how much they are trapped in their thinking by professionally set and repeated daily Verwirrbegriffen Orwellian kind. (Do not join those who mock us for that very reason, because they are off to and / or be familiar.)
A necessary Begriffspräzisierung can prevail over night: but it can also take a long time.
The main thing, the seed is sown once and then watered regularly.
[...] Application under false flag attacks, mass media manipulation, use of biological weapons (viruses), weakening the immune system over [...]
[...] The use of false flag attacks, mass media manipulation, use of biological weapons (viruses), weakening the immune system over [...]
[...] On Security Policy, covert warfare, intelligence, staged terrorism, false flag attacks, as well as the power of interpretation, the term of abuse specifically built [...]
[...] On Security Policy, covert warfare, intelligence, staged terrorism, false flag attacks, as well as the power of interpretation, the term of abuse specifically built [...]