Of course I'll accept also carnivores and vegetarians. We are so tolerant.
What I have, however, now part of vegetarians mischief (not all talk like or similar to, but not least), but that beats the drum to the ground.
When asked how they could because deploy their eggs and their cheese, and without having to operate Livestock, what one because then the Althühnern, Altkühen, Altschafen and Altziegen (the many young cocks, young animals, young goats also the only devour, if left alive, the feed the hens, the grass the cows away, etc., and not just) should begin to whether one should leave until the Altersschwächetod in the pasture to give them to the compost regularly comes only Geblubber ,
Even if I mention that million square kilometers of the earth are to be used only by livestock, often hardly to milk, but only for meat, leather and wool production, often a drivel of each animal also follows that because of his world in a corresponding could have outlet, we only wrong well managed and the like.
Well, such a world may eventually approaching, have been built. But it is not there, not even halfway foreseeable.
But what is already there (surcharge 'nix) is a complacent world of spirit (mind you not all "Veggies" think so), from which we advance all carnivores as morally low, even as sublime, view, criticize, if not can even slander. The chicken soup that eats the eggs laid me still soup from the bones of cow cooks who gave me the milk, is a pig. It's simple.
This is not the modern factory farming are spoken the word. But the reason.
I also have nothing against it if someone does not eat meat for health, religious, ethical or otherwise any reason. Why should I?
From the basic, unfortunately more and more popular Hinstellung of meat eaters as mentally (still) under-developed proto-humanoids, as cruel, evil does, but I have now deleted the channel fully.
And when I'm at it, I also have a terrible suspicion say which - unfortunately - hardened steadily for years: Behind often is in reality resentment, envy.
The typical vegetarians in this country is (in India, has grown so your mileage may vary) has previously eaten meat and sold it at some point. But mostly not because it did not taste it. But for ideological reasons.
In order to gain psychological compensation, since you do not even allowed to dream of a dike lamb chops, fried in olive oil with rosemary and butter until tender inside pink, the meat eaters own abstinence must be regarded as morally reprehensible as noble.
A bad joke is that many vegetarians ideological variety is just what the so-called NWO is concerned, as particularly aware and informed, it often does have, but did not see us see how they conduct themselves in such a flat alswie cattle elucidated apparently, in reality, a religious spare act harshly divided amongst let drive against the majority of meat eaters.
And they often lack a sense of humor. Jokes about their zealotry they can not at all.
And they close, as already shown above, rational arguments. Are easily offended. All signs of an unhealthy, at least for the spirit of religion.
Even Christians, what wonder, are there. That Jesus fish should have distributed to thousands, Peter Fischer was, does not seem to bother there. Even Jesus was probably mentally underdeveloped. Well, well, it would not be saying this. Bad joke again, Waswas?
But they know that Maasai, seeds, Yakuts, cashmere goat breeders in the Gobi, the Gauchos of the Pampas, the gazelle hunters in the Namib Desert, fishermen this world today, even those whose fishing goods consumed bought the Aborigine, the verkahlt a kangaroo the lama drivers in the Andes, the Tapirpirschindianer in the Amazon, but especially the Bavarian veal fattening, of course, all of them against mentally underdeveloped beings.
So they like it ethically correct Käspfannkuchen then all the better.
- Advertisement -
Tags: NWO , vegan , vegetarian
However, eating meat is wrong, of course within! our society. It's good when people are vegetarian. Better than nothing. Often, people do after more thought. Vegan is very hard and you should not lose his whole life and joy. It's kind of the choice of the better evil. I'm vegetarian, I do not dream of steak, I never ate like steak or other "real" meat. The right way for people in our society is the Vegan. Many vegetarians are vegan or vegan tend to live.
Incidentally, it is not art, with selfishness from the low persuade. So you have to be vegan, right? After what I've read of yours you just have to be vegan, otherwise I find the post here quite weak.
PS: I do not think that any difference with NWO / Divide et imperia and co can be explained. (What on the whole anyway just metaphors for "the human" are for me)
Masses (industry) food products is simply wrong. Yes, even vegetables from Holland and Spain. Your meat consumption with the defense of indigenous people is absurd.
I have not arrived at this ideal, but I'm LEAST vegetarians.
You could have a little way to write generalized.
Organic meat, free range eggs and co. are no better.
I hope I have misunderstood anything, your writing style is not particularly convenient for me. (Non-personal)
@ Xotix
I wish you lots of fun on the way to vegans, the last piece Käs'.
Probably you will then fit even less my writing style.
But maybe you read then, holy, narrow and emaciated, and even the rest of this blog and find it a distraction from your hard ordeal.
(Previously, the third penultimate egg, you might look in again, what I have actually written above.)
Well then tell me what you've written. The only thing I read is that many, rather the majority of vegetarians are heucherlische people themselves look every carnivore as mentally Underdeveloped, as sublime. This is used to compensate the envy which arises when they have to watch a carnivore eat at steak. << - That's bullshit from AZ.
Sure, I think I have the "more correct" setting. You think you have indeed the world more savvy as any supermodel. ALL vegetarians / vegans I know not afford a "missionary work". All, but really everyone says everyone needs to know itself. Rather, they are annoying because they always have to explain because they are attacked by predators than that these underdeveloped people eat meat.
In a society in which the over-consumption rules, which is trained to speak on consumption, in which each thinks he has the right to everything, is an ideology of renunciation, such as: veganism / vegetarianism praise to the utmost.
I'll give you quite the motivation "The animal's sake" has somewhat hypocritical. But it's a start, it is a first step towards the ideal of veganism.
Tells you to simultaneously wier man was aware of himself, he gained the power of intelligence, as well as a responsibility it was imposed. There is basically nothing wrong with eating meat. However, in our society, the dimension is exaggerating the consumption of meat! We have meat in the sauce, meat loaf, meat snack, in the Billon. We have things in animal glue, etc. that is simply disproportionately. In general, we eat too much. We have the opportunity to feed us Vegan. This would free live probably less possible, but we can offer this consumer abuse forehead.
Tells you, in Switzerland, farmers have too much cattle for the country. This leads to eutrophication of the country, destroying biodiversity and destroyed crops.
Well, you say above:
"But what is already there (surcharge 'nix) is a complacent world of spirit (mind you not all" Veggies "think so), from which we advance all carnivores as morally low, even as sublime, view, criticize, if can not even slander. "
and below
"A joke is that many vegetarians ideological variety is just what the so-called NWO is concerned, for particularly aware and keep informed, it often even are, but do not see us see how they conduct themselves in such a flat alswie livestock, seemingly enlightened, in fact in religious spare plot, divided amongst hard, drift against the majority of meat eaters. "
Biting is not that something?
I hereby ask you to provide me your rational arguments for eating meat within our society.
Oh, one more thing:
"Even if I mention that million square kilometers of the earth are to be used only by livestock, often hardly to milk, but only for meat, leather and wool production, often because of a drivel that in a corresponding world also follows each animal could have its outlet, we only wrong well managed and the like. "
I think that Targets the argument "livestock requires a lot of land. If one anfpalnzen vegetables would have more advantage etc. blah". You may be correct that not all land for Gemüseanbaut is good. But WHY the hell you have to manage all the land?
If I have your post still not gathered, I am either just too stupid or do you write simply not very good. No matter what the case, but explicame me. Thank you for a non-polemical response.
The best way to explain your rational arguments equal means your consumption.
@ Xotix
Well, I'm starting right on with my consumption.
A quick Internet research to make sure that I do not have the wrong in the head, revealed that meat consumption is in countries like Germany at about 100 kilos per capita per year.
This means that you (I'm not very bold I - there are videos on Youtube of me that the doubt prove) for an adult male with 75 pounds of body weight can probably assume 150-200 kilos as Durchnittswert.
Thus do we get to a value of, chosen prudently, 400 grams per day.
I consume on average about 100 grams per day, but certainly not the 150th
Sun alsomit a quarter to a maximum of one third of the average. And even on the overall average, babies, old women, top models, etc. included in at most a half.
One liter of rapeseed oil has about 8000 calories. This means that it or three people can live one day away from consideration.
That is, in the Bioverspritung that takes place now that (for maize, the values are probably somewhat better, with sugar cane significantly better) who moves a liter of it to vegan to eat out, already verschürt a giant pork Schnitzel (1600 calories) or an average giant T-bone steak (1100 calories), or a whole chicken from about 2700 calories. (It is about 5: 1 in pigs, 7: 1 in cattle and 3: 1 when measured in terms of caloric chicken meat production at the plant material required.)
And then, the way he needs to eat something so still.
And, moreover, provide animals that are often on pastures where nothing grows except grass and herbs (at least not yet rapeseed vegetable), also still eggs and milk and leather.
But no matter. So if I do less of what I would have to eat otherwise, during the day, ignored all of these factors, a pint of biofuel verfresse, ie with the most economical mobile 10 kilometers had gone, would they be, the production and maintenance costs, tires, etc. in the calculation. of a car, maybe five or six miles a day.
I do not know how many vintage cars are so few moves, but in their fuel consumption, it was enough then only for a longer ride of the year.
Will say: Here lies the madness.
As for the people who want to walk around in a T-shirt in the booth in winter, rather than to put on a sweater.
Where I could polish off three precisely measured legs of lamb every day.
Now to the attitude of many vegetarians.
Even at 22, in my Studi-WG suggested one day short love affair of a roommate at us, rolling his eyes when ever she saw only a sausage sandwich, and said: "I do not eat carrion" (I told her to the love peace sake, not that I ate no compost.)
I know another who his vegetarianism tells me so, animals are our younger brothers and sisters.
So I'm as one who eats his younger animals and sisters. Nice.
I could list many more examples (nice for you when around you all the veggies are decent), but content myself with only one.
The Christians of Universal Life are well known vegetarians. I do not know what they do with the male calves, even the old cows, whether coming directly to the knacker (Käs because they eat), but in addition a nice anecdote.
A fellow student who drank quite happy times at the club dabeiwar, himself a beer or two, told the astonished Magnus, that Jesus, who was not so weak and wicked as they drank unfermented wine. Of course I did not understand what was to be unfermented wine. But she insisted. Certainly Peter fished only Tang, and when Jesus had fish for everyone, there were Tangformteile in fish shape.
For the rest I do if vegetarians are guests, are only two things. Either Käsfondue with plenty of salad before, so that the knapsack not break. Or cold plate, where there are all sorts, and I make sure that the Käs and custard, etc. is the Veggie, and the fish stuffing and ham plate as far away from him how to do it. But I put them desfalls just right on the table. Should he get angry yet.
Should I sometimes come under a vegan, so it will probably be salad and afterwards, while the rest consumed a beef stew for the poor guy bean sprout soup. Because when I invite, there is not only because of a guest Spaghetti with Tomatensoß '(without Reibkäs!).
LG
I miss the rational arguments.
The calories of a steak with wheat Compare is bullshit. You have not considered that the cattle also must grow up being fattened etc. I have not checked the numbers now. Pardon if I have wrong, but would actually surprised me.
I agree with you, that you otherwise wasted a lot of energy. Eben eg with too many unnecessary air conditioning, heating, etc.
The whole thing reminds me of: "Negative by Negative explain".
The agriculture destroyed the country, it does not get it. The meadow is with eg 10 cows per hectare bypass (figures invented), but we have 100 per hectare. The Vicher produce fertilizer which leads all this is überdüngert. This in turn destroys biodiversity. As I said, you do not manage alels country is shit.
I'm also not a fan of vegetarian / vegan polemics.
The problem is simply the mass production. Seis rape, which de ground sucks all o for 3 years or cows fertilize too much.
When I look at the consumption of meat and vegetarianism, so the latter is the better evil. Culinary restricted you're not.
Well, I have it read only fast, I analyze your last post happy again later in detail.
I have you assessed anderst.
Do you eat McDonald's, Burger King, cheap meat from the supermarket, kebab?
@ Xotix
Check for now. You seem to have no idea what you're talking.
As it ausssieht, you know of horticulture and agriculture nor of livestock such as soil as of natural and cultural geography as a whole.
But after all, what of ideology.
Congratulations.
"To produce 1 kg of meat, one needs 7-16 kg of grain or soy bean" (Source SIA http://www.vegetarismus.ch/info/oeko.htm )
Magnus your meat consumption really seems to lie at the bottom.
And to say there are vegetarians who are like you describe (just not all) is a "Gusto" but not a fact. You seem any more than of livestock such as soils of natural and cultural geography with horticulture and agriculture altogether but auszukenne of vegetarians have you, sorry, no idea but judge about it. The very fact that there are three different groups of vegetarians is outside your horizon. This is not simply a bubbling but a facts that are actually legally based (CH) is clearly defined in the what the may include a "thing" to be considered a vegetarian.
what it is supposed to go here? Just pure thrash to a group? To warn people against vegetarians? the paradox of a man's life denounce? But Vegan (if you even have a clue here what that means in the deep) is not paradoxical or what? or less ...?
and with the ideology, what do you mean again? "The doctrine of appearance" ... I think someone is such runs a blog also have an ideology. go now needs to have the correct ideology ... Just as it says xotix ego can only say, You speak in riddles. And such undifferentiated total round envelopes as this post is, I can not take it seriously, but that's not important, important would it be for you to not take you seriously.
@ Light heart
"You seem to horticulture and agriculture nor of livestock such as soils of natural and cultural geography completely but auszukenne of vegetarians have you, sorry, no idea but judge about it."
The first part of the sentence is not properly understood me; Vegetarian but I have learned a lot over the decades.
And I shaved them, if you read me, what I wrote, not with the same brush.
sorry, the sentence was incomprehensible because I copied the list from you but forgot that there was still a negation in it.
I meant that you (I do not know, but I suspect) naturally have a clue of horticulture and agriculture, livestock and soils, natural and cultural geography. What do you not have a clue about vegetarians because they are divided into clearly differentiated groups. for example ovo-vegetarians do not eat meat, fish or poultry and also they do not consume dairy products but what are they eating eggs.
and what kind of vegetarians were these vegetarians have learned, you know?
Have you ever seen a cow or a calf struck down by a bolt shot? You are holding it for ideological reprehensible to say I can milk a cow, I can make cheese but I can not kill them so I also ess not an animal? do you think we should start to kill animals and eat around the country to cultivate useful? (!) and traded with living, sentient beings bit like the man as a kind of creature as well as certain people are treated?
what really makes me thoughtful but is this, that's why I also started to write here. I have visited your site again and see there the 5 favorites of the author. Reading but have yet dares the latest article about the "big miners" and read as the one just to small. Then I have just come to the said 5 favorites of the author and was reading something about "vegans take it seriously." So you turn to the issue of meat consumption, factory farming, killing factories, animal industry as to, or would there also some "juicy" to read what I could clearly favor?
@ Light heart
I recommend you to rummage "Beautiful" under the column; maybe because you can find something that you like.
uh, I really wanted a debate on the issue and sought no texts that I like / do not like.
@ Light heart
I will made the criticism Taking up betimes supplement or write a second part.
In the meantime, bring me my memory plus the Archives:
https://unzensiert.zeitgeist-online.de/2012/02/18/peta-veganer-konnen-vogeln-bis-der-arzt-kommt/
Magnus, now your serious or is this sarcasm about cynicism ... you have found something to be indignant about it? Focus a video and the "form" has chosen an animal welfare organization to finally Gefühlszombis to irritate a bit with Sähäx. since one hears finally to when naked asses flicker across the screen. and what you hear is indeed fully geiheil and ansprächend. Greater later on - fuck .. or it's Offensive, rude Fuck, I'm just a fuck and I do not want to be decent, gallant, graceful as a roaring stag, uh is it?
No. and not even very clever seem to realize what is at stake. Interest you the animals a shit. matter - subspecies auszunutzendes creatures, always good to schwafelnde suppression of a sentient living being. What's so hard to admit? The confrontation with yourself?
But come, an ass, a ruff, a bit Fickificki and the intellectual ass you to tears in both directions.
have fun in life this world will offer it.
@ Light heart
Well, if you can find the video properly, "Gefühlszombis" like me once purely a push properly, so you be the unaffected.
Show Animal rights activists Pictures of slaughterhouses they are too insensitive, they show pictures of factory farms they are propagistisch, they show a half Porn with with hints of injury during sex they are promoting violence, subjected to nwo sexualisierungsverschwörung, extremist, ersatzreligösiert and as well as vegan lifestyle in brain malnourished.
so ovisistisch like this to come you had to actually eat grass.
@ Light heart
Hate heart.
all heart if you will. Depends on level of it. You know Magnus, people who eat no animal deserves my full respect even if their IQ is <80. Self-glorifying people who will judge but eat no animals to humans and endow them with a reason XY I say what I think of them. Perhaps your site is well thought so, as pure poetry.
It simply will not do anyone a group (even though he loves to put parentheses where still not all schönrednerisch excludes). Who hundreds of pages filled with his opinion must not tell others they want to rub your opinion of someone's nose.
It's long been scientifically nachgwiesen that virtually all violent criminals eat meat!
The fact remains that meat eaters are penetrated by evil. Roast does not destroy the fear hormones. The Carnivore she injects a Mana and is anti-social in its interior.