Afghanistan: NATO defeat a victory?

NATO wants to withdraw from Afghanistan. This time, we may assume that even occurs. And in fact, in the sense of fighting troops, perhaps as early as next year, and not only in 2014, as officially yet been configured. Because so much good was achieved. Also.

From the set goals war are hardly any really achieved in over ten years. The opium cultivation and trafficking is as strong as ever, for women has almost nothing changed, what else do you have to say.

The only question is whether the masters of the NATO fix the deduction based on the understanding that they will not achieve anything in another ten years, whether it is too expensive to them (almost falls out, these people print the money), their own populations are the aforementioned included pre-calculated the costs yet, some citizens kriegsabständig - - objection to rebellious (hard to see some of it), or whether they have come out that Afghanistan at all levels too much military forces binds to many ground troops, which one soon or elsewhere needs in Syria.

You'll in fact by the purely numerical husband strengths of NATO armies do not be fooled. At the bottom of deployable combat troops are scarce.

Many of them are due to multiple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan - if not dead, wounded or severely mentally disturbed haunted by strange syndromes - extremely exhausted. To attract new, suitable warrior, is not easy.

This war brings easy at any level (more) a dividend. He's not worth it. It has long been used, the view.

You could not strategic position to build any frontline state against China and Russia, with something in this regard would be to start. Everything was a lie anyway, but now her legs are far too short.

It will of course celebrate their own selfless, heroic efforts and victory theatrical, so good that just goes. That one has completely miscalculated, we know for a long time.

We now know also that the "cure", called Special Forces, bombings and drone attacks, just like are only good for the overthrow of a regime, but not for long-term control of Afghanistan. Where yes, included private mercenaries, probably not enough over one hundred and fifty thousand best equipped to get around the reference points actually bring more than a few kilometers under effective control.

We are anxious to see how they will kill us defeat for sale as a victory.

- Advertisement -

Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages with others.
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Webnews
  • Wikio DE

Tags:

5 Responses to "Afghanistan: NATO defeat a victory?"

  1. Sir Toby says:

    And then who protects the opium cultivation ... when NATO troops leave?

  2. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    @ Sir Toby

    Good question. Vielleich go so the Chinese purely out later revenge against the Opium Wars of the English, and ensure that enough of it arrives in the West.

  3. rundertischdgf says:

    The Schröder government began the war with the lie that our freedom is defended in the Hindu Kush. The Merkel government will leave Afghanistan with the lie that freedom is now secure.

  4. Dude says:

    ... Until the next threat to freedom is found a few days later at the door ...;-)

  5. Magnus Wolf Goller says:

    I ordered the safety of Amazon a mini Statue of Liberty. I can, if she does not like me at all times abflexen on the farm. If the power fails, I have not even file. Because I have a Zweikilofäustel. The making them flat as a pancake.

Leave a Reply