Last night I re-read an article by someone who can write excellent poorly and was thereat previously noticed.
The things I know so far from him, he makes are stylistically very ground; very rare by today's standards; but I am not going to let him bestow the honor to mention him.
Firstly, because his numerous followers my criticism - most recently - its bliss Pope and the reasons predominantly reflex as previously interpreted envy of me Less comers, on the other hand, because I want to save me this blender until a better opportunity.
Very cleverly he argues seemingly individualistic, also like - supposedly - anti-modern, then, for example only, so to speak confidently to land at such idiocy as that Pope collective worship.
What annoys me is that I have not yet figured out how this man is lying, and the extent to which he believes himself.
It appears to be a mixture of both.
And after all, I have been a possible explanation for the background: vanity.
Vanity can namely be such a strong force that one is his lies finally believes himself. In this respect I may have no reason to tease me about my previous inability of the exact psycho philological assessment.
That he a member of a secret society - at least one - is, I think is quite likely; because he enjoys - not derived from its language power - obviously a high level of protection.
But, since I read some more of him, I always smell something wrong, a roundabout way, something Goethe cal (which he can then never reach this liar in his poetry to my knowledge).
Here namely governs not only the text semantic twist, usually alswelche not too difficult to prove, but a characteristic style that seems to come along pithy, but is ultimately slimy.
It will be me now perhaps many can no longer follow or want. (Especially since I continue to the Lord - will not name - at least in this post.)
But sometimes I allow myself the luxury of writing for the full few.
Those who know that they can not only read texts, but also smell.
That the dangerous falsehood actually those obvious text semantically-logical criticism is not fashionable, but rather grounded in style. (Apart from the fact that false logic, whether knowingly or unknowingly, may be packaged very well sometimes.)
Of which I have only read a few, but that's enough - - an outstanding contemporary illustrative material for a seminar with the most talented young linguists of the country In fact, the texts of this man would.
The man is so clever that it would like to be worth while sometimes to take every single Abtönungspartikel in connection inspected.
If a maximum Gifted lies in impeccable German, then it gets really exciting.
Well, as long as not book at least two excellent philologists with me privately, I'll have the thing go alone on the ground.
Once my time is not boring, I will have the leisure for it.
- Advertisement -
Tags: text semantics
