Banalbattel

There are people who think they can sit on a word such as on a stool or a toilet.

Often they only have one time or another a rare, special meaning, usually either a dialect or an older layer of language, somewhere, much less his own thought, then this finding bear constantly in his mouth, as a fetish, feel that account as a second Shakespeare.

Even worse, it is with this kind of childishness, if they have bitten into a saying or a proverb.

Then we hear on every topic sentences such as "Everything has two sides", hereby statements, which are the only way any at all, that they agree not evident.

Why should everything have calculated two sides? Why not at least three? Or ten to eighty (on so many atoms salary was once prized by some clever Meiern the universe)?

Then: "Nothing is ever as bad as it is cooked!" Or: "The cook only with water!" (Maybe yes, the cooking fat.)

The latter two phrases are seen to be not even wrong or inappropriate in any case, but there are those heroes who say this kind to everyone and everything, as if they had nachquaken herself as her own bullfrog.

So that's amazing how annoying it is also the reason why I write this, that this is not just jokingly, as a temporary fashion, young people in language that is pretty stupid perpetrated, but not infrequently by otherwise well-educated, intelligent.

So I ask myself because not infrequently, if they thunder into this record was the skillet with the Ehfrau through cap, or what they might otherwise have driven about so secrete this kind at every opportunity and not an opportunity.

I know I am a villain.

For such things must be as dear do not thematize.

This is highly intolerant: thus a mortal sin of our time.

That's me but no matter: Every decent linguist is evil.

He can not help it.

Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where users can find new content and share it with others.
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Webnews
  • Wikio DE

Tags:

Leave a Reply