Last Thursday I found a curious document in my real mail box entitled "Information of the State Government of Baden-Württemberg for referendum on 27 November 2011"
The pale yellow, 12-page booklet in A5 format, there is quite a bit of curiosities whose Funny - or saddest, depending on your perspective - I will briefly summarize.
After some general slobbering by the Minister Presiding ducks, whose vice and a greeting "the State Councillor for Civil Society and Civic Participation" (which is now all there must be a horny job;. As a 16-silbig bestallten, certainly well early pensionable Laber Back Post I would have liked.) is it seriously.
In the chapter "Assessment: What is" it says in part: "The state government has on 16.9.2011 introduced a bill in the state legislature, to be with the aim obliged to exercise termination rights in the financing agreement." (Rejected)
Since I had on my walk shortly before Wilhelmplatz laugh (Wilhelm was once our king): The government's goal is to be committed to what she wants.
(In football, it may indeed be something, namely, that a kicker is obliged by the club to which he wants to go. But otherwise no one knows this language more ...)
Then comes the text of the law, and after that follow each ten arguments for "yes" (ie the train station opponents) as well as for "no" (ie the train station proponents).
They should not all be regurgitated and evaluated now, only led the strangest contrasts.
Proponents say the desired travel time savings were mostly back to the new Stuttgart-Wendlingen-Ulm; the Opponents, however, say you go in the future from Heilbronn to Stuttgart Airport in 48 instead of 86 minutes from Rottweil there in 63 instead of 102 minutes from the main train station in Friedrichshafen 100 instead of 135 minutes. Well, not everyone Schwab and every Baden moves over Ulm to Stuttgart.
Proponents of the exit then claim yet, probably totally unsecured, more than 350 Milliönchen did not cost her non-project (the train is talking about 1.5 billion), and the promotion of the federal government and the EU would anyway (which also seems far from clear).
And just I saw a poster that is made especially perfidious: "Yes to protect the environment and train station"
Many are clueless think they voted "yes" for the new station building.
And just as the Hyper-gooder Democrats have created their propaganda deliberately; to deceive the people; just I read in the newspaper that 17% of the Baden-Württemberg believed they voted "yes" for the new station.
Now comes the blast.
Against the new station namely must vote not only about fifty percent of the voting transferors, but according to state constitution also more than a third of the electorate.
This means that with a turnout of 60% to 55% of the votes are not enough to be sufficiently against it.
And at 50% turnout, it reached 66.6% Yes then still do not.
And - horribile dictu, but possible - with a turnout of 40% not even submitted 80% of the votes, because that would be only 32% of the electorate.
You have almost hope that no such scenario materializes, because that is the loser but certainly declared to moral victors, and the whole Zores would go ad infinitum.
Sometimes I wonder anyway, whether in this city besides me at all what one creates.
Final comment: I can not really say that I am in favor of this new station building. But now against one. This has been done by their swindling her intentionally deceptive Finassiererei the opponents. And while I will not go to this farce of choice, after all, I agree with as a sort of half-voice quorum sake, against one. So no, or an indirect Yes. Without even have to move my ass out of bed.
Nachschlussbemerkung: For me, admittedly, is also the fact that I now have almost developed against the Greens as mendacious, hinterfotzigste all warring parties a kind of allergy. Around the world, around bombs happy and at home shouting "Hurrah Islam!": This is the last background. From Gender shit dirt and Klimalügerei times to mention.
- Advertisement -
And this whole farce because of a train station? Maybe we should turn on the steam locomotives again, schwäbsche railroad flat. In some parts of Asia, entire cities built in the period in which we argue about a railway station. I wonder where German spirit of innovation and progress will they go? Maybe we should take a role model and times of the Swiss. There, the new Gotthard base tunnel is being built. Estimated cost 10 million euros. Of course, the people were asked before and during the necessary follow-up financing, whether it agrees with the building and not, as in Ba-Wü whether it is for a law for the exit. This is ridiculous, pathetic and pitiful.
@ Jörk
Consent.
(There are probably more but 10 billion euros. Can happen.)
Well heutztage yes that does not matter anymore. Million, billion, trillion a few zeros more or less ....
If the station is built for and is ready in 15 or 20 Jahen, which cost € 8-9 billion and Stuttgart has a Nadelor if then even one raises the voice of the proponents, is being in a sack and as long as thrown against the nearest tree until he shuts up.
@ Alex
I do not know what I should gather from your comment.
That you beat yourself Station supporters to silence want?
Or should the others do for you?
While all the green-supported wars in order?
If you have just a little ass in the pants, you respond after this announcement under real names.
Otherwise, it should have been severely wayward, worst-made satire, you excuse yourself at least under Nick.
Otherwise you're just another cowardly bully for me.
A Niente.
I am also going after disengaging the park guards mini tent city to talk to the people there.
If they do not kill me, you'll hear from me again.
Anyway, you wofern you to read at least dare myself.
Maybe you should read the comment before a right times. The man "shut up" from being read from you right manslaughter out, not just of looseness testimony and I have to vote on the related, They say nothing now, or for (against) the station, people are not after the completion then open your mouth and whine about it when he makes problems that you from such a construct is tinker quite petty.
@ Alex
"... If then even one raises the voice of the advocate, is the. In a sack and thrown against is as long as the next best tree until he shuts up"
That you have written above.
Or is it?
I have previously for over an hour on the spot with a park guards, who already holds out there for a year, entertain.
After that, more than an hour in my local pub with another railway station opponents about the matter.
You're a coward.
And small-minded.
And violent horny.
But myself just cowardly.
Shame on you again for that, if you bring the completed at least.
Can it do so in secret.