I was wondering if I should be taking a break from altgläubig, just to see what happens.
Recently I have very clearly expressed my opinion in the first part of what the Dalai Lama arrives.
A reader would have skinned for me the most, and on another level, my post was, so to speak smoothly because of religion by insulting.
What all this may happen if one of Mohammed or the Koran highly takes is known.
Now comes the Pope, and counter-demonstrations are not approved.
Meanwhile, can be made arbitrarily ridiculous Germanic pagan ideas: what is correct.
Why only these?
Who has determined that Islam, Catholicism, Lamaism enjoy special protection, the pagan worldviews will not even begin received? (Funnily enough, one may strutting much harder on Pope and Christianity than Islam, who is brutal, is rewarded, and should not be confused with the Lamaism peaceful Buddhist monk on mountains.)
Must be particularly sensitive to their followers, because there are so many?
That can not be good, because whilst it may be more Catholics and even more Muslims in Germany passed as confessing Gentiles (for a Muslim, you are automatically Heide, if you do not belong to the Abrahamic faiths, hereby any rights), but hardly more Lamaists or Jews.
No, because it is not.
Rather, someone (who !?) found that these worldviews of - as mentioned different sizes - need special protection, to the abolition of art and freedom of expression: pagan but not.
Well, it may be as a form of compensation for envy: for their miserable state in which youth.
The fact enjoys millions of games, where, despite the Celtic-Germanic forms before teeming, but it is unfortunately neither of llamas and their demons, jinn Muslim, nor Christian angels and saints, the Hebrew prophets, etc.
Probably these religions need a privileged special treatment by the state because they are so barren and boring, so comparatively boring.
It would also be much too delicate for game makers to engage their protagonists in colorful comic fights.
Which company probably wanted to afflict with incalculable risks that such necessarily arise when?
So you can from Thor make a gay morons who always keeps his hammer upside down from Freya an ugly, cunning nymphomaniac from Loki a funny prankster, the toads eat for breakfast, from Valhalla a Greisenpuff from Odin a paranoid Quassler whose lame hoarse croaking ravens and only annoy him shit on his shoulders: anything goes.
The other way round but ...
Therefore, I will not begrudge me exceptionally obvious reasons now, aufzubilden similar scenarios in connection with the sophistication religions here.
So I'll leave it to your imagination how that might look like, what would happen, but it verwagte a ...
- Advertisement -
Tags: Holy Hypocrisy
Is not it the epitome of religions that people argue about the omnipotence of God channel, so that many of these right God?
I see this not quite such a way that there is no God. I'm just stating that believe anything on faith, so to him or not based think.
Some believe he does not exist, others that it exists.
And some believe so hard to know that they are capable of killing others who "suggests" their belief in a particular God, which in turn imposes on the people very specific rules and for the ever-repeated entry into paradise do not share, (want to).
Although I am not an atheist, at most agnostic, but I do not see why you have to attach Fan-a Chosen of one of the institutions of power of religions God likes, be it the Pope, the Dalai Lama and others that are better for your own safety not mentioned by name.
"God's writings" can, however fantastic interpret, depending on your mood, country, and of course depending on Machterweiterungs- or power conservation agenda.
If there is a God, because he talks to everyone hears every prayer, he stands them. Then it goes to him only to sincerity, to the contrary of what do religions in general from people.
If God exists, then there can only be one at all logic. And must, in all logic, be of all men "father". From me from a multi-faceted, but not many are exclusionary gods.
Thus the whole fuss exclusive of religions is so terribly ridiculous that you want to have so easily and fairly comprehensive absolutely nothing to do.
These are pyramids, part of the game, power tools, man-made propaganda and brain washing constructs. With the search for God they have to do as little as dishes with justice, or mainstream journalism with the truth.
Whether it but God gives, is an open question for me. I stand by that.
PS:
The Dalai Lama, I bear that Fangetue and his eternal grin as little as you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWshPH_jsjQ
@ Armin
First of all: Thanks your differentiated Communication.
I have tackled an iron that lay like heißgefrostet, as though an iron can be cold weld itself.
Now many are angry that something really should not be.
And many of those that are allowed to the which are also's.
Well now!
How big should be the one who is still stupider than yourself?
At least in a competition you can but if quite boldly, usually win.
This Glaubenssystenme require state protection for the same reason that the official version of 9/11 need it. These are not religions because religare (back [to] bind) refers to the ground of being. The faithful are (almost? *) None of the above theories of you religious. The monk on Mount maybe ... because one looks beyond the confines of their own denomination perhaps by accident, and his own observations hires. But never per se, for state-protected Indoktrinierungssystemen. * Although I know too little of Lamaism in order to presume I can to distribute all the same religion with the Dalai.
What do you mean, what was going on when the Abrahamic sheep (briefly!) Woke up because someone refuted their lulling dogmas? I think he would physically attacked until lynched as a heretic. For before the horror, the psyche protects by displacement or even elimination of personality shares.
@ Anonyma
Funnily enough, I have been retracted the fiercest announcements or threats, as I once made fun of me about an Indian guru a little, and now, see Vorartikel when the Dalai Lama had to go through my satire.
But there is another reason, which I unfortunately can not explicitly designate at the moment, which is why the Lamotentum is now even more dear to me my pen.
>> I have tackled an iron that lay like heißgefrostet, such as if an iron can be cold weld itself.
I like it when you touched these irons. The highlights from your blog by others, often only the obvious (or should I say Popular repeat). I think if you're a fan of anyone, you would have to endure criticism or even advocate.
Whether in the form of satire or from me too seriously. Otherwise you will be blind supporter and this is extremely dangerous and stupid at the same time ...
The question of God (or God) is so an elementary and, for me and probably for quite a few others, including lifelong question (only been in the sense according to the "from where I come from and where I go") that each this must form his own opinion - and this also should be able to discuss FREE.
I like your for me in such a themed items and wish I had very diverse comments on it. That You will probably privately or hostility is very bad!
But precisely. Lately, I often ask myself the question whether the "alternatives", whether in the religious field or in the political, social area, often (and I say this not always) only are boring gatekeeper of the system again. Hirnfotzige overflow valves so to speak.
I think we are now really 2011- including 5 no 1 second before 12 situation -. Arrived at a time when we should finally harness the collective diversity of Inperpretation of reality to a constructive future. Where it is not enough, the infinite lie, the total Shallow mantra: "Man is evil, man is evil, man is evil" to repeat.
For the time where you could say, "I have a monopoly on the truth" is, in my humble opinion clearly over. The current game yes builds ultimately on the sinister arrogance to know (!), Which is good for the people, humanity.
Ultimately, the problem of these slaves world that is determined for probably thousands of years above us. Humanity will be incapable of - put down good and must be constantly indoctrinated, manipulated and gebessertwissert - even Resolute. Otherwise it will not work.
To the Wise guy elites: Your scoundrels! Just as it never was and it is not right now to go ...
For 2011, now almost a year, the rate of the Bilderbergers in Davos me in the ear is hanging like a lousy schmaltzy song: "Yes, we have an agenda, but it goes to you for nothing!" That's it, you idiot!
"The Dalai Lama is the Peter Lustig for Christians disappointed"
(Hagen Rether)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb4kG8su9yA
;-)
Mohammed drove camels, the Dalai Lama schiert yaks.
As I have commented with for many a faith issue a few times, I would like to introduce to you our saints, the Dama leagues and the current one. Mega cool, I tell you, the habens still on it.
http://quer-denken.tv/index.php/mfv-tv/752-die-erschinung-der-madonna-im-glas
@ Hummingbird
http://quer-denken.tv/images/Saint_Wilgefortis_Graz_Wiki_Gugganij.JPG
That with the Feminine Christ is easy to explain.
These are the principles of the Jewish faith. Adam was created from the dust of the earth then. The Eve but was created from meat or from a part of the body of Adam. All the people that came after, were born of Eve from their flesh. Therefore, according to this belief is all human creatures, so no matter whether man or woman, meat and FEMALE.
The meat is made subject to vanity, what is imperishable after that faith is alone in the MALE female. Women are therefore in Israelitentum, I do not say this especially Judaism, and it is also the case in Islam, meaningless! And the first Adam, called the origin of creation, is that Messiah for whom the Israelites still wait for him to come a second time. Wait for him practically all wrong instructed believers in the world, because they think he was God (in ancient Greece they called him Prometheus). The Christians call Him Jesus Christ and they hope for His second coming. - So if Adam was the first and the second coming is still pending from him, but then who has been crucified? - At least not the one about whom all the world may believe that he would have been there !!!!!!
Meat passes, it is their God sacrificed on this belief, to symbolically home the male part to lead to God. The female part is a part of this world, remains and gives birth to itself new - the eternal cycle.
If Jesus (as the MEAT) depends on the cross, then that means symbolically that the female part has been sacrificed, while the male part can live on. So enstand the story of Jesus hó Barabbas, the one who should have been released instead of Jesus Christ. Barabbas (bed. The father's son). The son, so the male is the female preferred in Israelitentum ALWAYS, even even if a woman always does good and a man always evil. The Israelites are a very warlike people.
The symbolism of the colors: Jesus, the sacrificial lamb in a white robe. Barabbas was a robber, robbers are usually dressed dark or mostly work under cover of darkness. This leads up to the occult, the worship of Chaos (NWO), material a natural solar eclipse. Who is born then, is the Light of the World - Lucifer, whom they all indeed so much adore. That is that they expect that it comes in the MEAT to rule the world as sole ruler. So all the world is on the WRONG as their Messiah!
This had an opening is made in the life of man in relation to his spiritual return to God, is a piece of meat, that is a part of his body FEMALE, sacrificed, so they even circumcise their male children EIGHTH day. This has just symbolic.
And now, a faith gets times back out of the minds. It is almost impossible.
2.Mose 22:30 Likewise shalt thou do with thine oxen and your sheep; seven days, it may stay with his mother, on the eighth day thou shalt give it to me!
When the Israelites there are sheep being sacrificed MEAT is sacrificed and in the Bible it says, it would be a fragrance for their God. Therefore, this God is also for war. Since only WEIBER be sacrificed even if the men fall.
In ancient Rome there were oxen and bulls were sacrificed on special days. The Romans came Christianity on the basis of Israelitentums. No wonder, then, that there are Jesuits, who are behind everything, in a very negative sense for our disbelieving eyes.
As far as the ancient Egyptians, where oxen were revered as sacred and not slaughtered. Therefore, they are the disbelievers called the worshipers of the (golden) calf, like the REAL Jews do it well. The Jews made up only during "ox" an exception because they knew / know that Jesus was / is the false messiah. And yet they were tricked by the Romans and then, they chose the crooked that he be crucified. For the one who was crucified, was one of their own ranks. My opinion is, there was a certain Thumelicus. The son of a Germanic chieftain. But to explain this now on, leads to much and takes too long to me.
Jochen
Nice that you made yourself the trouble to explain it exactly.
You know, but I wanted to point out something else, namely, that has changed in the manipulation and dementia tactics of the past until today nothing. A few days ago it occurred to me: "They used the religions used to go gaga us today this is done by the media." And how it would be, I came across this site, out of curiosity I angklickt this product when I saw this picture http://quer-denken.tv/images/Saint_Wilgefortis_Graz_Wiki_Gugganij.JPG , I was struck by the startling similarity to Conchita that is or he presented today in the media and hyped.
I had lightup for me laugh, this striking resemblance.
I also got another confirmation that the Abrahamitismus from ancient Egypt runs through to the Roman Empire and up to the present time like a thread.
All religions contain more or less the same doctrine, only the figures are presented somewhat differently and hot little different. The doctrine of the incarnation was obtained earlier in Christianity also, which was removed at some point, as this could easily control the masses.
I find it interesting also that the Egyptian characters in our area in the "oh-so-HL. Tyrol "find again and again.
That the Masonic circles have a secret knowledge, which is withheld from the public, which I'm sure. But that does not matter, because between knowledge and awareness, there is a huge difference.
Mother Earth also carries universal consciousness, I consider the connection with Mother Earth makes more sense to run than any beliefs behind her. In the Celtic tree horoscope this connection is made is very nice.
Funny every plant, every tree has deep roots, the man takes off into spiritual spheres, is somewhere up there on the road and thereby loses more and more contact with the Earth and thus consciousness.
But as Mr Goller above already said, the Mohammed drove camels and yaks Dalai Lama schiert ... ..as I read this, I also had to laugh ... .and Jesus tended sheep.
@ Hummingbird & Jochen
I had to laugh out today splash when I saw how today's Messiah Conchita Wurst was yet so well drawn in comparison noon.
It is about time that the Scopts return (a tireless Kastratensekte in Russia). The images of the Wikipedia entry are a bit, so to speak for themselves, Nachpostmoderne from the 19th century. Somehow even cooler than Conchita. Holy gender Asmus well!
@ Hummingbird and @ Magnus
When the / the Conchita Wurst would now be crucified, they would have to worship a new god.
The then that would mean buffoon. Then the chaos would be perfect.
But today is not so crucified, but simply someone knocked down in the street. Is X times faster and the insurance covers the damage is even.
LG
@ Jochen
The poor sausage I will really not call in. It is also difficult to achieve the Jesus. Although the Jesus works on many representations a bit gay, but usually quite masculine, and I guess the women that may well be more accurate in the religious than men, are still more likely to be on this than on that sausage.
This is of course intolerable diskriminös, scandalous, inhuman.
So they are but, most, just let you say of the women.