Dominique Strauss-Kahn must soon, if he is expected to release from the beautiful USA, in the next round, or rather, this has already begun by now a French journalist, has announced his show because of a rape trial nine years ago.
Since they have not shown him because they did not mess with a mighty politicians want.
The bad joke of the matter is, in turn, that there is probably no witnesses, the circumstances hardly can be clarified yet enlightening (except, perhaps, that there is an interview appointment was indeed) which might cum covered laundry should be washed now often enough ( but also when fresh could be the result of masturbation or consensual sex), will most likely simply be just his word against hers again.
This time not from a black muslim Asylbetrügerhure, but from a 31 still almost virgin acting, sweet little Marie-France in jeans with knee holes that looks as if she had not even ever have a dull Fußwaschwässerchen.
It is the thing, no matter how much like drape, anyway, can gild, at least wealthy get out of the deal if they are not hiring totally stupid.
The professional lies they should have learned as a sheep media journalist well: this is very much likely.
The whole thing is likely to extend back for months, Strauss-Kahn will have no chance to socialist Präsidentschaftskanditatur, he will probably be politically finally turned off.
Whether the feminists in France and although anderwo allowing for increased upper water will get as already last seems to me questionable.
And women who were actually exposed to sexual assault are, be be (which I do not exclude that DSK is left somewhat guilty), which seems to have been proved by the stories Assange / tile man / DSK a disservice.
How far can one but Alice Schwarzer eg probably not thinking, namely, that here the night watchman syndrome could grab.
The treatment Kachelmanns was incredible that Strauss-Kahn's cruel, that Assange's completely ludicrous.
In the first two cases very dubious stories, Strauss-Kahn from the beginning full of inconsistencies, in the latter case a judicial farce about a "crime" that could reasonably have not been there in a western country.
Three biographies ruined, just like that.
And in all these cases it was completely obvious grounds for suspicion that defamation could be behind evil machinations, but hardly anyone (I'm hardly anyone) dared the public clear: in order not to fall under the wheels of political correctness.
Must during the completely absurd case Assange not be discussed further (but is not yet complete, Sweden has not given up my knowledge therein, to make the no-go zone for men) remains, that a German judge tile man indeed acquitted but in the verdict imposed a perpetual suspicion about him.
As it will probably end at DSK?
("Men are pigs ... Believe them not a word ... there's unfortunately no exceptions ...")
- Advertisement -
Tags: feminism
