Who persists here with demands for prosecution of expressions of opinion, whose Gelump is deleted ansatzlos.
This here is not a Punch and Judy show at shorter cords, no Esoterikerkindergarten, not a mental asylum sports ground, no informers blame and no one's private Papal States.
This kind of nonsense is hostile debate, annoying and unworthy.
Censorship fantasies as indomitable personal necessities like elsewhere be lowered.
- Advertisement -
Tags: censorship
Most Approval! But a single malicious fundamentalist who is reading this now and can anonymously report it, convince a hostile censorship prosecutor, are correct in the sense of existing, almost any auslegbarer Gesetzesvorschreibungen - and good night, Marie.
No worldly authority has the right religion-critical or denunciatory statements, even to sanction unique blasphemy. This could cause personally offended (imaginary) deity after all. But this does not change the German laws.
@ Lis Minou
You mean probably a censorship friendly prosecutor.
I let myself be intimidated in any case of any eventual Vicious fundamentalists.
Then I could close up shop right here.
Opps. :-) Clear censorship friendly.
@ Liz Minou
Supplement
Before such aberrant already preemptively to buckle, meant unconditional surrender.
From there you should be really rather not say anything more sensible and more slowly moldy in a monastery of his end, because even to know the world of free lawn.