Here it is claimed that NATO sit in Libya uranium ammunition.
The Iranian agency PressTV reported it , but from dubious sources.
Although you have to - unfortunately - strongly suggest that you do not waived in this war on the most effective anti-tank weapons, but unequivocal evidence is not yet out of my knowledge.
You will also should not expect to that Kriegsbejubler the sheep or the media "journalists" they are walking around times with the Geiger counter to battered tanks be fed large agencies and tell us the results.
But: Does anyone still have credible information?
Please specify here !!!
We can not know whether NATO has meanwhile not yet sober fact - if, rather then probably not from philanthropy, but from clever calculus out - and this time these weapons prefer not using.
And should not therefore simply assert something, be it ever so likely.
That would just fit so the warmongers.
- Ads -
Tags: uranium ammunition
globally seen just ridiculous
no proof but clues:
The military and the politicians are very shy about the uses of depleted uranium, but we knowthat DU is or Has Been Used everything the ordnance. The list is not exhaustive:
* M919 25mm ammunition Used in the Bradley Fighting Vehicle141
* PGU-14 30mm ammunition Used by the A-10 Thunderbolt II
* M900 105mm tank round Used by the US Army and Marine Corps
* M829A1 / M829A2 120mm ammunition Used by the M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank
* Tomahawk cruise missiles
* GBU-28 'bunker buster'
* CHARM 3 APFSDS L27 ammunition in use with the British Army
* The 5000 lb BLU-122 / BA / B penetrator
* The 4700 lb BLU-113 A / B penetrator
source: http://www.risq.org/modules/Upload/banking.pdf
recommended and with stellungnahme to you in libya:
http://www.bandepleteduranium.org
How do you dispose of its nuclear waste, love FRG government
@ Eberhard force
A little clarification would be welcome.
@ Burro
Thanks for the advice.
Of this is indeed reported in many mostly alternative media for several days. Clear evidence it actually seems not to give, but that should just not be so easy to obtain.
Probably the most solid argument based on circumstantial evidence and inferences derived from the "Stop the War Coalition":
http://stopwar.org.uk/content/view/2321/27/
Then invoke most other articles:
http://www.jungewelt.de/2011/03-29/059.php
http://www.radio-utopie.de/2011/03/29/abgereichertes-uran-eine-merkwurdige-methode-um-libysche-zivilisten-zu-schutzen/
http://de.rian.ru/security_and_military/20110329/258706698.html
etc.
Magnus Wolf Goeller
"It is also hardly can expect that the Kriegsbejubler the sheep or the media" journalists "they are walking around times with the Geiger counter to shot-up tanks be fed large agencies and tell us the results."
Exactly - especially as a journalist so his existence risked. I only remember Grimme prize winner Frieder Wagner, is the air since his documentary "Deadly Dust" (about uranium ammunition, highly recommended!) For his former public donor rolls.
Here is an interview with Wagner, in which he also quotes a mirror-editor who confirmed uranium ammunition was also in newspapers a taboo subject, too inconvenient truth.
http://www.muslim-markt.de/interview/2009/wagner_frieder.htm
And here's a video interview with Frieder Wagner:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMlON5A75E
@ Föhnix
You see here an example of how a presumption of how a message is crafted from the claims of any source.
In many so-called "alternative media" is just like working sensationistisch or uncritically disseminated what would probably like to have the readership likes.
So it hails hits, and to get into the conversation, is linked etc.
This is more than annoying.
@ Magnus Wolf Goeller
You see here an example first nothing, not even your own ignorance. You get sources and testimonies, but then talking about the usual undifferentiated nonsense ... did you just not busy! So your opinion is worth nothing.
-A Doctor who treated uA a high number of highly deformed people, especially children in Iraq travels, with a radioactive sample to Germany to be examined this - He is arrested and put in prison because his sample was radioactive. (Dr. Siegwart-Horst Günther)
-A Journalist power works for a public service broadcaster and making a documentary about the use of uranium ammunition in various wars - he is fired. (Frieder Wagner)
-Or Even simpler: Just investigate whether there are such weapons / ammunition at all.
This is clear evidence - what you expect / her ?! - That it appears in the mainstream the topic ?! or is admitted by the warmongers ?!
Make judgment without having previously dealt with the topic - THIS is more than annoying!
@ Mr Saviour
First I would like to moderate the tone.
That you brought up is I had long known and has been here and is so often mentioned as a few pages that take on still other topics.
Something closer reading and a little less spontaneous, ungegründetes foams really did not hurt.
It is quite true that this topic is treated in most publications little. To complete the list mentioned above, I take the liberty to add these reference here:
http://www.doppelklicker.de/Uran-Bomben_und_Depleted_Uranium_Munition_in_Libyen.8863.0.html
Deadly Dust Who has the Geshen be familiar these images.
http://www.focus.de/politik/videos/amateurvideos-von-libyschen-aufstaendisch-handyaufnahmen-zeigen-kaempfe-in-brega-und-misrata_vid_24183.html
So, I can not see why you should not treat this thing, just because it has not rebounded the public service media?
Here comes times to discomfort.
Well that's no reason to invent stories. But also DOING none.
Instead, we have a compelling logic of the last war in mind, where uranium devil was fired.
I just came to this page looking for serious information and I'm glad that one is critical. Be critical but does not mean the matter to be swept under the carpet!
@ Karl-loving
I have evidence that "normal" uranium munitions is verballert by NATO in Libya.
But so far no hard evidence.
The probability of use is very high in my view.
We have to stay tuned until we have it out.
Does not claim to be exhaustive, but lists a number of sound sources, including the results of supposedly independent people who are "times with the Geiger counter to shot-tanks" running around.:
http://www.eufrika.org/wordpress/2011/07/libyen-uranmunition-zum-schutz-der-zivilbevolkerung/