I just checked it this: In today's network issues of image, Stern, FAZ and the mirror I could not find a single report on the oil spill.
But breasts everywhere (is ok in the heat), the weather man who allegedly raped his girlfriend, and so on for the 250th time, etc..
Of course, any editors can decide what they want to tell (well, at Springer signs every journalist from the outset very strange contracts ...), at least in theory; but this would not be one of those cases for a necessary daily reporting?
Or is the thing but not so bad, and I have all the photos and reports zusammenhalluziniert me, showing only the lowest part of the oil and describe the consequences and can document, since that is held by most of Corexit under water?
Will we soon learn that there is the Gulf of Mexico nor ever was or how BP and Bielefeld?
After all, we can assume that it will still be in the picture itself Archives bosom, if they are otherwise naturally already extinct and the Finnish like the Gulf of Bothnia long versandlandet.
That it still is Bielefeld, you can if you want, see the following text, the things cites that I had to just not heard precisely, namely an explanation of the unusual oil concessions to BP by the U.S. government as a reward for Britain complicity in the (oil) Iraq war:
http://phoenixrisingfromthegulf.wordpress.com/2010/05/22/the-gulf-oil-spill-a-matter-of-national-security/
The author speaks of a "Faustian alliance" ...
Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web with others.
