The highly toxic Corexit Öldispergator is sprayed by BP in huge quantities over the Gulf of Mexico, but also deeply targeted release under the sea.
The US Environmental Protection Agency calls once the restriction of the use, once it has finished then they can run again everything, because BP simply makes and is to be used as alternative.
The terrible suspicion suggests itself, according to experts, that Corexit the environment in the long term not help, on the contrary, increases the risk again incalculable; the exact chemical composition of the agent is secret; However, its extreme toxicity has been demonstrated; Therefore, the UK banned its use in the 1998th
One, however, seems to afford Corexit: It keeps the poison-oil mixture effective in deeper water layers; the oil does not occur to the surface.
After is now assumed that estimates of ten million liters daily emerging oil, ie an order of magnitude more than at the beginning of the leak, the real reason for the massive poison stakes could be that the world does not see what is happening under the surface, since the oil spill does not grow in normal dimensions, but instead make huge undersea water-oil poison Silt bubbles that are redistributed from every conceivable currents in different water depths.
The fact that the EPA and the US government, the yes by their laissez-faire policy before the disaster this at least likely made, could have here a hidden common interest with BP, is obvious.
Where appropriate, this meant that the real disaster reduction appears to be less important than the targeted mislead the public, even seems quite possible that the disaster could only whether short-term propaganda purposes have been even further increased tremendously and continues to be.
Then we were dealing with a wide band to pin down heavy-giving criminals.
- Advertisement -
Tags: BP , Corexit , Corexit Conspiracy , Conspiracy Corexit , EPA
"Then we had to pin down with a big band to heavy-giving criminals do it."
Let us count times. How many such bands have we got so far?
As already run criminal charges and even local vending. But what happened? The band members have for just a tired smile and it all comes on as before. If the world is not crazy, I do not know why all this can happen.
All always talk about the environment and we are taken for a lot of money from, there is hardly anything Protective value there.
... Ever heard by the Gulf Stream?
Just one question in this context.
The world has gone mad!
Perhaps the Conexit only needs to be destroyed. The transactions must run!
@ Jochen
Protect Evaluated's been there yet ...
@ Vido
However, one could also see the thing so that in this way also submarine can reach us even more (to). The idea is to pursue anyway. Thank You!
@ I
That you can of course still could dispose of old stocks elegant, may also be an aspect of this giant mess.
"The Corexit-preference of the British oil giant is no coincidence: BP is on the board of Corexit producers Nalco. Right at the beginning of the oil spill bought BP Corexit on the total portfolio. Nalco's share price shot now by ten percent in the air. "
Can be found here: http://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/oelpest248.html
@ Hermann
Thanks for the piece of the puzzle.
Magnus Wolf Goller says:
May 28, 2010 at 17:58
@ Jochen
Protect Evaluated's been there yet ...
*******
But not much. Our language effectively but also has been botched.
"Protecting Refined" - Yes, this word has given me problems. Good to know that it is not alone as I am.
Because "Corexit-preference" People love artificial stuff like that more than nature. I heard in France, it is to use the peasants were forbidden state, nettle tea for pest control. The reason should be obvious when you think of the "Corexit-preference". But some French peasants resist and do not respect the ban. The French just know how to put the revolutions in transition.
Now I have to put in the word Language Top forget the "r". As you look at what you anrichtest with your blog Magnus.
That with the ban in the UK I thought too, until I was instructed a better one. Bottom of page 4 in
http://www.epa.gov/bpspill/dispersants/5-21bp-response.pdf
EPA appears to be driving a double game, or the media are misinformed.
@ Enlightenment
Thanks for the interesting link!
Quite as prohibited seems Corexit in the UK for not going to be ...
In fact, things are EPA-double game.
[...] Obama Nobel Peace Prize, which covers 75 countries can wage war (see "Obama war hornier than Bush") forms as well as in connection with the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is no exception (see "US Government & BP: In Corexit conspiracy? "). [...]
One might almost think that earth-nature fights back and destroys everything that man does not care and managed care.
The oil gushing now more than planned. It destroys everything that moves there and bewegt-.
I add malicious :: Now they get the neck fully hopefully, they can drink as much as they want- available in abundance.
When propagating across the seas and more bubbles and bubbles, then man can do is hope and pray or bangen-.
Then everything goes out live in the sea and in consequence all around has a life.
Where were the regulators at the right time? Where were the inspectors? Probably the oil stock price - including millions.
Yes, classy man perishes.