After some following my comments contributions I made today freitag.de to Mohammed cartoons debate nor the next one (explanation see the article "kowtow"):
Magnus Göllerlifte wrote on 02.03.2010 at 23:17
What is remarkable about this discussion here that has except yours truly been explicitly position relative no debater on whether the Muhammad cartoons, regardless of their aesthetic or personal-moral judgment itself were admissible and were thus to defend within the meaning of freedom of expression or not; thus became a key issue for Krux, to the 'real thing, with different accents though, just not say anything Binding.
It is a bit of, but also a bit too much against freedom of expression, all the back doors will remain open generally tells of respect and intercultural dialogue, but rather lies times no commitments.
This is not surprising: although you probably justifiably speak no great fear that soon million offended Göllers flags and messages light and show up with axes, but given a religion that you as a linker except for the issues of racism and nationalism (which the Koran as I know, actually does not pretend) in almost all aspects traditionally as "fascist" or outright would understand fascist, alone whether their totalitarian claim to absoluteness and the status of women seems a yet to be little queasy what one but again can not really admit in the sense of that a clear dividing line would be drawn, and there is of course not want to attract negative attention.
So you lose in Üngefähren, "somehow left" filibustert and betting that they had actually do not really have anything to do with the subject, asks one's own society tolerance and again empathy, while the other side any clear signals are set, where is their desire for domination in culture and law actually end with us.
I call this dialectic of blackout.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Friday , Mohammed cartoons
