"Christianity and Islam, possibly Judaism, tend to fundamentalism, if allowed to exercise their own discretion." - So, Thomas Steinfeld does today under the title "On the criticism of Islam - Militant propaganda" on the line side of the Süddeutsche Zeitung, a ,
A remarkable record.
Why "possibly Judaism"?
Is Judaism as the religion of the Dreie that at most times "may" tends to fundamentalism, so the least radical, rigid?
Believes Steinfeld, I guess, probably not even in an emergency; so he has for his comparatively reduction of Christianity and Islam, and vice versa have the raising of Judaism against these other reasons.
Had he afraid to be the "anti-Semitism" accused, he wofern dared to pull down so sublime a tolerant religion like Judaism with such rabble religions such as Christianity and Islam on a stage of fundamentalism inclination?
He went from the assumption that why no Christian or Muslim, let alone a Nichtabrahamit would dare to question him as to that even the potential charge of "anti-Semitism" such an endeavor certainly sprouts?
Maybe it was just a reflex already automated, preventive Pavlovian Unterwürfigkeitsgeste Steinfeld, and he thought nothing there.
As a Christian, or Muslim, I could be me not so easy entering an offer these nevertheless; Nichtabrahamit as I have been privileged to be able to simply laugh over the small columnists.
PS: by the way also noteworthy that the critics of Islam haters Steinfeld even indirectly-covertly says that one should not exercise in its sole discretion Christianity and Islam. Just say the critics of Islam regarding Islam only very directly.
- Advertisement -
Tags: debate on Islam , Judaism
