Following "Quote of the Day" I saw just the second time, at least on the libertarian line side of "strange free" (ef-magazin.de):
"Censorship" is a term that is applicable only to the government. No private action is censorship. No private person can suppress another gag or a publication - just the government, the Freedom of private individuals constitutes the right not to agree, not to listen and not to finance his own opponents..
Ayn Rand
What an arrant, fantastic nonsense!
When Pippi Longstocking the strongest man in the world is not, but even the strongest girl to make the world than how she likes it, that's quite fun, not just for kids: Unfortunately, however, it can be assumed that this quote taken seriously here wants to be.
I do not work out for me personally, I still belong rather to the bolder talkative, and auseinanderklamüsern here, how many times me a publication of "private individual" was suppressed even in the net, I got a gag in his mouth, I did not want my losing their jobs or even hurt my kids' own fault ".
And I've never applied myself with the Italian, Russian, Chinese or a Balkan mafia in the direction gag and censorship because you get this privatissime faster and much easier, especially since communicated clearly.
The above aphorism is, no matter how wrong this is, we simply say that entrepreneurs and especially capitalists and all other non-officials as opposed to a government, which (probably in this context, a translation error from the American "government") Here the State is meant never lead such evil design, or even align what privatisierendes robber rabble may also always gather alswie a state that guarantees always evil, since evil by itself from the bottom of her.
Very embarrassing.
I wonder slowly so that people who believe such a thing, no privately financed police, at least peculiar Freikorps or modern ordered mercenaries against the Federal Republic of Germany, have set up their constitutional and national defense, all of whose government police state.
Private police forces are still the order of the day: Every customer paid voluntarily for their services just as much as he sees fit.
So that every police officer from each customer will finally be respected and not considered a therefore overflowed at the worst possible times Penner with pension claim, because he does exactly just what his private chef or voluntary consortium, for which he provides his service, he will, and is along these clear guideline also promoted and paid entirely bureaucratic.
This peculiar law enforcers also omitted like to unpaid overtime for the purpose of writing long reports uninteresting, but contents himself with the required purposeful reaching tangible results in terms of its free service tasks set out in skimpy oral Private repeats.
Because of the peculiar free vigilante his client never circumcise their expressed opinions, or even forbids them to talk to the press, that is censorship actually no longer takes place.
- Ads -
Tags: ef-magazin.de , free strangely , censorship
For the first time I read it / s blog and find it very appealing even at second glance!
Criticism of the above quote I share! Also, it does not make sense to me why there should be only States that censor. As if there was not a more penetrating all areas of life condition - but here and there certainly is not without reason.
One can also understand something intentionally wrong.
Undoubtedly it would have in the article separately must be clearly stated. However, some who even think about coming out.
Whose post will be deleted from individual private blog, which is not yet censored long.
He has the opportunity to post his views on other blogs. Is 'uncomfortable', does work - but still no censorship.
After all, the right to freedom of expression includes a contrario also a different opinion, do take note to have or not to be involved in their distribution to need.
For example here would be posted Nazi propaganda.
In your opinion, the deletion would then also censorship.
A real censorship can only come from official sources, as these so then applies to all publication opportunities, and not just a few.
The best example of statements that fall under the Penal Code §130.
Notwithstanding the above you do not need to dirkutieren through this § the FRG is definitely a censorship-state.
The end does not justify any means a real and strong democracy also coped always some idiots.
Thank you, Tanya Kriener, for the flowers
and
Dear Inclined reader,
of course, the Federal Republic of Penal Code is strong even damaged by § 130.
I have worked in this blog several times unequivocally in favor of lifting this Kastratenparagraphen, I think even been in a satirical form.
In addition to state censorship exists but also that if you want to write about, for example, so minor issues such as methylphenidate. Total no censorship direct threat of prison, but an effective, economic and social.
To be in such a case that you express, for example, to or for the swine flu or uranium munitions as a physician, critical or even revealing, not necessarily shaved by a steel cable; Jail's not even if you pay attention and know what it did the lawyers the other side; but for economic ruin it extends all the way loose very quickly.
And everything you've ever written once in your blog, because it is no great printed newspaper remains for all time for possible future employers stored, so that the same can figure it out yourself on what a treacherous scoundrel they were getting into because ,
In "peculiarly free" is sometimes dreamed of imposing such a way that I sometimes wonder if I should laugh or cry is: If it were at least left Traumtänzer!
A part of this dream I wanted to pop by the processing of the quotation, hopefully for the better.
For it is not only unspeakable mischief on this page, else I dealt hardly repeat it.
MfG
Their
MG
The view can I follow - and must also agree.
I had mistakenly thought only of the black / white boundary (private / public), not to the extent perfiederen 'nuances' through financial or social consequences, however.
Shame on me.
Dear Inclined reader,
Thank you for your feedback.
and
Lady Krienen,
I still noticed that the flowers end with the same letter as your name.
Regards
MG
Censorship should things hot, to prevent others from using force to express their opinion. But from no claim may nevertheless arise that everyone has itself to pursue its cost and expense, so that everyone else can because its only publish. Or am I wrong?
ef has indeed now even the comment section completely blocked and even deleted. So I have my own page and launched a blog reader for a comment:
http://leserkommentare.blogspot.com
@ State-learning disabled people
Funny idea.
But tell me my gut that the trouble might be.