I've just looked on the net a video in which a brave woman unshakable uncovers lies and explains the related methods such as real mental (yes, that is real, I know) suppression.
I do not link now but there because I'm getting straight on something (not quite) different.
Namely that side of self-empowerment. This just does not happen in the group Hinzens and Kunz.
As the word implies.
One of the most insidious lies is namely those one alone can achieve nothing, only together with others to be strong.
She aims to drive in any one or more meaningful groups, as a solid, compromised Member to make it so that the herd animal, so that with an inherited group of thousands, if not millions, to direct.
100 self-thinking "anarchists" pose more potential than 100,000 opponents of nuclear power, animal rights activists or Occupy activists. (Are there really still that of the latter? Fun was once again quickly.)
This does not mean that I a rampant irresponsible individualism spoke the word here; not that you should not join a sports club, even cynical look down on the rest; it's simply a matter of time alone and spontaneously, sometimes planned to put things without coverage, even in transition.
Freedom begins in your own head on, proving through independent action, and not the fact that you go to a demonstration along with 500 others.
Networking to meaningful way today often take place otherwise than in a joined organization structure. As needed, to allow eg in a company, other permanent joint action: of course it also requires the. In the family, among friends, anyway.
It's not about detachment. It is my intention to use force at any time as smoothly and purposefully.
A helps B, B helps C, C B helps to know E, and E helps some point, perhaps without knowing it, at some point A. More and more people recognize this principle.
Clear that it also because shrinkage, losses are. The only parasite here sorted quickly, at least not for long, even from.
It is form-free, flexible networks based on voluntariness and mutuality, which need not act directly as shown.
This can create an effective capacity, in addition to the traditional compensation models over money or direct consideration, not only offers new horizons of experience, but is also easier and more effective.
Put simply: Each lot of unnecessary middlemen and -händel falls away. All save. All win.
I'm talking about no Utopia. I really see more and more people who have grasped a small circle out and implement.
Such a "meeting" is not simply dissolve by the police or drive by their fatigue or frustration in the lands of Orcus or even there. Because there are always new challenges.
What I'm talking, which is neither communism nor communitarianism still libertarianism or some other ism; it is the sign of the times for those who want to make a difference and where the purse is not so tightly that they can order almost any anyway. This is not only the village.
You learn in a big city, to mutually recognize. Exchange performance in the ring without money. Even without consuming, especially distorted exchange currency that does everything nonsensical stood facing one on one with hydrocephalus obauf. Only the Minister of Finance is angry. And those who otherwise prefer to just manage, create nothing.
Recognized correctly, this starts from the idea of trust and wholesale, without this meant a naive, purely released for utilization of altruism: it is a form of self-empowerment. The only abzockt, flying not long over from the hologram.
I would even go so far that there are powerful morphic fields in the making and already act; where no money is flowing, but indeed for deed for another, as is otherwise expected.
I do not know how to benamen that.
Readers Dude called - probably just about the intentioned, what I describe - the times "the principle of free giving." I do not mean that he is so right. For here, the gift will always, if not directly, retribution.
It's about a further, higher broader concept of reciprocity. The fact that Flayed particularly, sick of it, except to recovery, or even permanently, simply caring, does not change this in the principles nothing.
Where Goldman Sachs is made to say in reference to Hölderlin as the other grows also.
- Advertisement -
Tags: think True
"What I'm talking about, which is neither communism nor communitarianism or libertarianism or some other ism; it is the sign of the times for those who want to make a difference ... "
It is conscious and steadfast being and doing, in undoubted, deep-rooted knowledge of the interconnectedness of all individuals around you, and beyond.
The relative individuality in absolute individuality conscious of the closeness to and with all other individuals who need no leader, high priest, politician, pyramids and other constructs.
"Dude readers called - probably just about the intentioned, what I describe - the times" the principle of free giving. ""
That comes out. It's the principle of the free Give yes to work around the creation and of creation (of which possible should benefit all individuals) sake.
However, it is the free gift giving absolutely not about retribution or retaliation, because we know the cosmic laws, and alsomit make sure that everything comes back; sooner or later ...
Expectation Create Free to the best of my knowledge and belief according to the individual gifts, abilities and talents.
Herewith you have definitely come a further crucial topic that to deepen, the weekend more than worth it!
Too bad you have paragraphs forgotten here in the article (I do not even know you ?!). - /
@ Dude
Because of the paragraphs: The system has spun so that I first delivered notweis. I got the item through with difficulty. Remember, the rework. Wanted him rather just the same so as not dahaben.
For weighting Tigeren: Yes, this issue is driving me around for a long time and may be one of the main nuclei at the weekend.
In advance - just now to Bedenk for you as for those who like to think that account - I mean, that already it is respected, already here on earth, who only subtracts energy and nothing or returns too little. I do not like to postpone or reincarnations Walhalla.
That your approach is so to speak the "Higher", so I will not deny. It should be the right probably right actually, just maybe not all for now. I mean, that there is a little education work is still required. So can not everyone Lump suck everything must constantly.
This whole page is wofern you do not take as pure ridiculous, egomaniacal self-representation, other than the exercise of self-development, and all that just from you or Thomas comes back, a permanent free giving. Never not require a penny from anyone.
I want to make you so clearly: Let us suppose, I help a young, penniless artists, just like that, to bring its home page thoughtfully on the way, put into it a few hours, then, that he, not half a hand for another hearing in a similar situation, each turn is preparing, as is the just first out there for me. Once, twice Magnus, just like that, but not again. It is here that was surely clear, not that I just wanted something from him. However, yes, know that whenever I would need his help, I must beg those without quite expected this to get back at least half. What I did not anyway. But that does not matter.
These things that we're talking about are developed in a very tangible. And I will, to say express in a dramatic picture, my kitchen knives do not give in Wi Give a religious fanatic, stupid to the disembodied holiness, to that of the Behufe, stab me, not even more at the flea market a suitable cheap device must erstehlen.
So, tomorrow is enough to, even official, so I still nachgeuße a sip.
A distinction is between the stepwise feasible and moreover desired; the addition to the desired visible gradually feasible mentally already penetrate so that the desire to go all the more arises; to short set-in, hereby excessive demands on the children of men but no help.
We are located in a fruitful contradiction and contests (in the best sense): none are so easily satisfied.
This is a good thing.
Today I met two very professional women successfully, even mothers, which, although designed in a classic shops, money speech, no refrigeration on the day. And that, as far as I did not leave my people skills, they did not even play.
MIR is in any case and was not always freely given to all, however not a little, as far as I may have even given themselves, and how much less my children. (That's what I'm saying more that does not belong here, and moreover it would do to hurt a lot.)
We will also use the money still have to get a while. We are working on the transformation. However, this is not just conveyed by rash, excessive extrapolation. My I.
It is a true quite often risk-like, but quiet, as transport of further thoughts.
"I mean that as a little education work is still required. So can not everyone Lump suck everything must constantly. "
However, Magnus, he may. You may just not the demand of the rags that he should behave kindly, as you imagine the ...
"... Then hear that he was the outside not half a hand for another who is in a similar situation, each turn is preparing, so for me just now. "
But ... he has to face the consequences. Namely with the morality of others.
I repeat here only in spirit, in another form, what you said already, and therefore not in a contrary intention, but perhaps clearer: You may send each his own help, but not require, if not contracted, so regulated clearly, that he reciprocated the help. Expect yet, according to our own pleasure. And the Lump also refuse to own help, if he should be their own expectations of gratitude which, of course, to him not met. Give Help and should still be done freely, without the basic requirement to counter help. But giving and helping is a free decision and must not be called themselves. This makes the Lump in the near future to create.
The moral at the end it gets just sent.
Perhaps an interesting point to think about: can never be entirely disinterested help, because there is one in return feel good. Perhaps this consideration is often worth more than the loss of Hergeschenkten.
@ Thomas
Sure you can ask anything if you gave a try.
If one never returns anything, or just widerwilligst Smallest, then one has recognized him after all.
The article I've just set translated by Jon Rappoport, should you, like libertarians.
If yes, go ahead and put it a link in the PdV.
Good man. The what may.
(Damn, I read the article rapidly down and noticed only during compilation, that is not so short So now there were but a few hours of work..)
Is just happen on the Bayern side.
@ Thomas
Thank you. Again Have just with their own thoughts, based on Jon's articles, refilled.
https://unzensiert.zeitgeist-online.de/2013/01/23/falsch-is-right-and-correctly-is-bose/