Friendship (II)

With love (whether physical or mental level) it works so well known, often with many not as pretty. I want to talk about it even now.

I wonder why so many of them, if that does not hinhaut not, at least first try more with friendship.

Always it is equal to the "Big Love" to be.

Yes, the friend with whom you can sit and meditate for beers and things circulated and sometimes laughs, like the one in the arms of the woman he loves not to replace, but: What kind of a dumb, stupid statement?

Not to love about a real friend?

Like the faithful might not be much, and still there when a woman passed already?

Quite a few throw away a woman because of her friends the same rotten potatoes, or they whine when the woman away from her friends, but when what remained still, only that account that the woman away.

Often enough this is supposed to listen to his friend, who, when the woman was still there, the woman's sake anything was, nevertheless remained faithful.

So he gets to experience disrespect nor rigors extra. Free.

Many think not even that far in their delusion that a man (I speak now only soherum times, women like record analog), which cultivates friendships, after all, even if leave or even widowed, but still kind of fulfilled love if a different cares and learns. Just not merely as self-pitying mope sets only its shadow over everything.

We are dealing here too but with a socially created master problem.

A single woman, the next is not completely and unattractive, is considered one that can get out looking, just picky chooses not every ranlässt, a man who has given up a long time alone, but not libido the desire for union with a woman, shall (unless he asserted that interested him no more, what is it but hardly believed, when he's not quite misogynist on the plaster skin) as one who abkriegt just no longer a loser.

This is obviously a huge nuisance, can be very stressful.

"Whether the ever again a place?" - So it whispers behind his back, and he noted that, either way. Not just what his mood lifts.

But whining about not helping. So it is set up. Yet.

Friendship!

- Ads -

Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can find new content and share with others.
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Webnews
  • Wikio DE

Tags:

21 Responses to "Friendship (II)"

  1. Dude says:

    Dear Magnus

    You speak to me so straight from the heart!

    There was to the effect already heaps of self-experience, and few really understand what actually enough, friendship, and thought through - and especially LIVED - means (but that is the Verbildungsinstitutionen and the sheep media propaganda systematic vaccination in the verquerten brains!) ...

    The article could have been from me!

    A promise is a promise, like other honest, in the natural fabric of love and humanity for granted, things are today in neobabylonischen vicious system along with its slaves often only apparent.

    It is sad ... sad sky!

    Ps I already know why Uncle Frederick was never tired of warning of the wenches. Yes, it is the goddesses, to move the world is in a position, but the rule is abysmal and despicable, matter fixed and brain washed, completely verblödetes Gesoxx!
    Pps. Störts me - in the face of - at least not completely, that I've experienced decades no decent fuck more ... Matter Fixed bullshit in a cryptic system dominated by morbid Zentralistenpsychos!
    Ppps. Nutten I felt after the first experience as pure, from the essential, life distracting bullshit ;-)
    PPPPS. Who is chatter behind the back - no matter what kind - can affect nor ever has, something decisive is not checked in this madness of the cosmic system in Santatoriums Quanentcomputer, and should go deep into yourself.

  2. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Dude

    I am not "anti-women".

    But I have here represent several times the idea that women, and they usually do not notice it, are all gender dirt etc. average led away from accidents and even more of himself than did men. That's what's really "diabolical" in it.

    Still earlier, I served me a beer in my local pub, did it come about that I (of a man whom I had seen, I already knew from his companion a few verbal exchanges) responded to my Weibslosigkeit was.

    I said that as a single parent with two children not just be the big hit on the market, the women would most possibly bring Knder, einhandeln but no host colony, thereby offering verschmälere already times, and besides, I had no desire to stupid women.

    The latter I say now ubiquitous, sometimes even when I'm not required to directly. Noblesse oblige.

    I know, after all, what is a woman not stinking.

    So I seem to have a not to be underestimated knowledge advantage over many men have.

  3. Dude says:

    I went above and not in the least about you to insinuate woman phobia - absolutely not!

    I have not mentioned the last true free goddesses who are truly goddesses, and under which any man's wardrobe VOLUNTARILY dances, because he knows exactly that they are not materifixierte Biatches but true goddesses.

    Unfortunately, they are rare ...

    Ps I drive out to the patchwork Familiy crap.
    Biorobot, such! ;-)
    Pps. "Non-stupid" is an insult ungeheurliche! Your names in the Uniform Terms and Wortschöfpungen seek their equal, but here you have used the toilet!

  4. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Dude

    The "not stupid" was only Swabian understatement, also set satirical.

    My writing hand smells not to toilet.

    I also will not specify how toes nackerte U.S. tank drivers if they drank three beers.

  5. Dude says:

    Yeah, brilliant 'but the great praise from and fixable on the outlying rebuke * chchch * ;-)

    Freshly brewed, hot and delicious variety of Alpine herbal tea with honey, brown sugar and rum fits. ;-)

  6. Dude says:

    Since missing something ...

    ... Because every tank is obsolete. :-D

  7. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Dude

    All right. If we study the case that I would have vergaigelt with "not stupid".

    Recently, we had time and again visited by a "non-Dork". (Two other "non Dork" have disappeared.)

    Not only that, I do not worship the same as a "goddess" wanted to (which they probably do not even really appreciated), and that I not only agree with her, but also that I'm not here just for good reasons, only with a big toes vertical scratching, throw in the dust.

    Those who you call "goddesses" must, must also perceive that you really respect her.

    Even noble women love a good, honest praise, but are surrounded by foam and umschleimt, they do not want. So anyway, I know das.

    Namely, they are even able, it must be more; worship, hurray, any testimony, promises: "Another such Schlunz?"

    You are looking to get out anyway they want. So you can forget about any classic Advertise anyway.

    More than that you are honest and yet as good as possible shows its outline is not losing, is not there anyway.

    The undoofen women remember everything.

    For her Weibsinstinkte occurs also still a clear view and an incorruptible mind.

    You want to finally no, they have to look down to the inevitable.

    So the guy should have - even if it may be granted a little bit from the usual theater - do not collapse in the same whining themselves.

    "Goddess," which you should save up for it if she wants to be one too goddess.

    (. Embarrassing lecture I wanted to grade - at least initially - away from the women, But as it is sometimes in life..)

  8. Dude says:

    "Two other" non Dork "have disappeared."

    Bookmarks have - or have we ;-) - either just scared, or it has to do with her book project actually so much that any comment activity time is no longer there (which I could well understand, and therefore likely as the look).

    The Campo de Criptana history - Phoenix and Armin can greet ^ ^ - but it's definitely very slanted! And I say, although I have the hay on a completely different stage as Miss T.

    "Not only do I not the same as" "to worship ..." Goddess

    Who is talking here of WORSHIP? No!

    Acknowledge, appreciate and honor, but always self as an individual completely self, open, free and unbound - absolutely!

    Thus, logically, not to idolize, ensnare and ass crawl, but only worthy accordingly attentive, thank and praise, it is commanded, what is on the rare true goddesses just usually is! (Funnily enough, the barmaid in the shop where I kidnapped Armin, just one, and they told me today, nothing concrete wanting from me, that they do not treat all guests as friendly as I absolutely do not ... ;-))

    There are definitely goddesses (with her will has nothing to do because they do not's will, it is merely a sign of humble devotion to the Divine, which the denomination equal is aptly yet!) Because of this, if perhaps not directly on the surface, but deep inside consciously sure, absolutely. Otherwise they would not! And that's the problem with many wenches and all fives of cheap wannabe men ...

    Constructs, constructs - pale Idelogien ... Bun'em!

    Advertise for money horny sick idiot, not for people. The true man shows, just by his BE, that he is worthy.

    Ps Yes, life sometimes brings strange ...
    Incidentally, today I have for the first time commented on your Zeitgeist colleague Ms. Beck - what a coincidence .. * Lol * :-)

  9. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Dude

    Yes, that is with Tanya to think well. I nachzufassen tried, but not consistently enough. Crap. Homework.

    To another.

    So a barmaid.

    Nice for semi-no-longer-in-ass dude.

    Have you quite sure that they not only from general sympathy to you be so kind to you ansagte, or (and) because you were so pathetic angedudelt?

    I went, I was not sure, she would have liked, but again in the bar But. With a safety margin of at least several days

    Where are now the friends?

    Again only women?

  10. Dude says:

    As sure as it has in the desert sand!
    It was also not the first encounter ...

    Since it is one of the last remaining bars where in Zuri-Downtown nor allowed to smoke with your drink, I shall come here again for sure, and she had been there every time ... ;-)

    I like it. But I do not want you expect. :-D

    Women can just be friends too ... :-)

    Sleep well - me butzts degree after the second tea! ^ ^

  11. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Dude

    It throws me now.

    Just ride the wave.

    If you add even still allowed to smoke ...

  12. Thomas says:

    About Big Love instead Freud shaft: You forget the hormones, Magnus. The great love of nature is equipped with all necessities. Staying together forever ... well, probably not.

    Friendship, however, is something else. Friendship is not defined by hormones (even more hostility) but through intersections, which are large enough. This is at least my experience. I have lost friends because I eventually moved the intersections greatly. Sometimes I grieve for them, consider the elapsed time in honor and like to think back on it. Nevertheless, I can no longer with them. Put another way: I could not with my former self.

    Such is the way of things. I often think that I would stand still, had no development, no progress. But it is this shifted intersection and the associated loss of friends, which we are not separated in the battle to teach me a lesson again and again.

  13. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Thomas

    It can of course also be the other which reduces the intersection with its development.

    There are simply too phases, be it that women play a role or not.

    Rumors can inflict harm, neglect, the alleged or actual happiness of the one measured at the other, and the respective acquired social status.

    For many of the old friend is also a living reminder of times, they want to strip the. So they replace him with.

    If there was not a decisive rift, no slow growing alienation that is the usual cause. Pure anxiety.

    I had for many years at a social occasion a reunion with someone who is, has to be expected, shiny and probably bitten by a month after taxes deserve what we get along Dreie a year. I looked at all the old acquaintances that he had no more enemies. Only I can spell small sausage, SAP straight times and know that it would have been wiser to learn when my unnecessary words and phrases, before he took his mighty eight. He still knows as well as I, as I formerly zusetzte from behind. Smart as he is, he did not go to a war of words.

    Meanwhile, I ran into another, who was not present there, but all the old gang knows, no less successful, although not well financially, but status moderately sure that I finally hold known, the late beer to those of an asshole. And I saw that he inflicted injuries still tugging at his soul.

    Itches me, after everything else has happened in the meantime in my life, the old betrayal particularly no more, but when I saw that, I told myself again and even more so that to me is bold not just one more time, without to obtain a settlement. Myself from all that he has surrendered obviously mentally. By the way his former Hauptkumpan against me.

    He saw me (knew enough about how it happened to me the last few years), but not destroyed, as (I have at least situationally, but make them subject to potentially more far reaching) he had probably desired.

    For me, he did not become friends of the enemy, and he is but avoid any place where he could only come near me. With good reason, for his money not impressed me, he knows me not chew your ear.

    So it can go.

  14. Thomas says:

    Again at the intersections. A thought that came to me straight, immature, provocative:
    As a friend, the friend is only through the mutual intersections is garnished with a little "difference" to argue, to be loved? The friend then not rather the mirror of your own self? Perhaps ideally with a few features that you wish yourself to be? Is a friend of the intersection is not degraded by the spiritual whore? What a friend is it worth? Is a friend of undetected expression of self-love, even by sheer selfishness? Is one's own image in the mirror will not be the better friend? The man in the mirror is not a friend of protest, but agrees in all. Boring? Yes. But then the view of the intersection of theory but the best friend there is.

    So that makes the difference only the friend and not the intersections? If so, how much difference is needed, how much of it is too much? Penetrance of the difference in what is acceptable? What quality in what quantity is important and tolerable? Power on an opinion or view insist Direction friend broke the friendship when I hold the opposite? From when? How often does the opposition come to light until it pops? It must pop? If not, why not? What makes the difference? Or at the end just makes the (common) time the poison?

    I lack the literature on this subject and I did not take the time to let the idea ripen over, therefore forgive the confused questioning.

  15. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Thomas

    Oh man.

    Asking questions.

    Your probably at least professionally by her given technical and logical thinking does also correctly on the reverse on intersections. Or. the counter-questions.

    Your questioning is confusing in any way. On the contrary. It provides consistently built what many acclaimed books not afford full purported answers.

    They will be charged empirical statistically unlikely to answer.

    You go on the motivation for a friendship on the existence until the end of such.

    These are questions for Insichtragen.

    Anyway, I can, for as important as I think they are particularly, and probably not just because to me because nocturnal walks just perceived morning, not one of them just so eingermaßen valid answer.

    I try it times partially, as I just can's.

    What you call intersection I said times and the common, where interests, not necessary, but often decisive opinions, do not go where compliant, then at least in a similar, at least related direction needed, probably just the spice of difference, otherwise, You have shewed how's the mirror image, you just talked with the mirrored image as the best of friends, so himself (and at least I'm doing most of the day).

    I think that here, where we have the hormones that neglect in a love relationship more oriented now to just not rather put aside may, in some sense expresses itself even more from the spiritual constitution of a man, as in one of those, and this is true but not generally, because there are love affairs with strong sexual, even violently so as out-living component that actually heavily influenced by spiritual communion and the corresponding stimulus, the upward pointing differences. Let me put it as flat: It is now some couples who can not only eat together and schnackseln but also verbal and nonverbal, the same friends, rub together, ignite, spiritually evolve.

    In the latter, it is probably in the cores. Says the friend I just (yet), what do I know? I have to tell him anything new? I am for him, he for me, just habit, a monstrance do?

    At the back, of course, is also the very human question, "he help me in time of need"

    For apart from socializing and intellectual development offers friendship indeed security, and this may be sometimes a relief ausgreifenderer kind, but already begins with the fact that you can both incriminating mention things and have them carried out, standing in front of you so otherwise communicated alswie little one are just inspiring.

    Respect, a good friend is always mirror of one's soul.

    For me, it looks just as as if I lost a very old. I have only a vague idea why. There was no disagreement, it seems to take place only from the other side, a kind of degradation. I wonder now if I should appeal to the research, which I might just do it wrong, or if I should wait, so I might as well just do it wrong. (I will transcribe it, it really does not commit evil against me, anyway never.)

    The intersections are certainly not lost, nor the fruitful differences, there are also still said third factors inhibiting, alsda status, environment, often the woman.

    Sometimes even just a mediocre fly in the face, and then he remembers his friend. And not just the emergency sake, because he demands help, but quite properly, and because he recognizes him. That there is of course also in love relationships.

    All right. Now I blathered a bit. Your questions were certainly better than my attempted answers.

  16. Thomas says:

    Nichtbeantwortbare is a question better than an obscure constant attempt at an answer?
    I think not.
    Thanks for your answer.

  17. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Thomas

    I did not say that your questions are unanswerable.

    Only that there could be no clear, statistically verifiable answers.

    Such questions can, but if just makes sense, what I think here there is no doubt, to be the most valuable and weighty.

    Friedrich Nietzsche, not the flattest of flat heads turned, many such questions. The plummet into the unfathomable lotend down very deep.

    Take the supplement, the sister of the solder: the (water-) scale.

    This is about how to balance depth. Weighing killed in depth.

    That may not be many people's cup of tea.

    But, to quote Nietzsche: "What schiert me that!"

    Such questions, to the point, move the mind and therefore the world. Point your light under a bushel.

    Anyway here such questions are welcome. And it was just me. That's it.

    LG conditions Ünnerfronge

  18. Thomas says:

    The Fritz I have still not been read, may bring to me. More light on the questions of
    And I did not say that my questions would not be answered. ;)

    LG to unnerfrängische abroad!

  19. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Thomas

    I empföhle you "Genealogy of Morals" and / or "beyond good and evil" and the "Twilight of the Idols" and then or equal to Zarathustra.

    You are mature enough and made of a wood gschnitzt that it should be based also from the front to the rear.

  20. Thomas says:

    Zara I've been there, the rest I'll let me bring carts. Only the lack of time to read ... I've now since several dozen books that I want to read more ... And the strike has held up quite nicely. Now first Roland Baader's turn: chalk for the Wolf

  21. Dude says:

    Beyond good and evil comes next to me afterwards to make at Ecce Homo ...

    http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/authors/search/?query=nietzsche ;-)

    The e-readers are already useful techno scrap, especially as you can carry a whole library with you, with almost 200 grams of weight .... And much .... Read values ​​subject not even the harsh copyright crap! :-)

Leave a Reply