. Henry Kissinger, the Knower of Bilderbergers & Cie should, according to NY Post recently have released the following sentence:
"In 10 years, there will be no more Israel."
Normal translation, so there have been all understood: In ten years there will be no more Israel. (No longer exist ... Israel.)
Could be. How do I know?
But, given the explosive nature of the set of so authoritative source (Ahmadinejad ventured only so far ahead that he thought Israel would not eventually give it what the effect intentionally -. Creating war of aggression reasons - has been permanently incorrectly translated and reproduced and that he the eradication of Israel - "must be wiped off the map" - - "must be wiped off the map" have called) I have second thoughts about it.
Very colloquial, I know, but I mean to have heard quite appropriate, you can tell if a child cries for more strawberry ice cream: "In ten years, there will be no more strawberry ice cream."
Means: There will be in ten years no more strawberry ice cream.
So just as a big portion like today, like now.
Would be transferred to Israel that there would be territorial yet continued to grow in ten years at the expense of other peoples.
It could therefore also be a very skilled packed warning rotate in such a way that will further expansion of Israel by the United States no longer supported nor condoned.
I know this sounds a bit speculative, if not crazy, but I wanted to share with you this not possible reading.
(There are reports of plans to extend Israel not only all the way to the Jordan but from the Nile to the Euphrates.)
- Advertisement -
Tags: Greater Israel
Interestingly this would be to know the original context of his statement.
Your link has unfortunately given me the effect at short overflight no answer, and I do not have time to search.
Actually, I did anyway no time currently, but it has a certain importance that should not be underestimated, therefore a pertinent precise clarification would be helpful.
Greetings from Dude, battle stations. ;-)
@ Magnus
"(There are reports of plans to extend Israel not only all the way to the Jordan but from the Nile to the Euphrates.)"
These are so-called biblical prophecy, see here:
Isaiah 19:25 what the LORD of hosts, it is by he will say, 'Blessed is Egypt My people, and Assyria the work of My hands, and Israel mine inheritance!
(Assur = ancient Babylon, as where the garden should have lain Eden.)
http://haschmech.wordpress.com/2012/05/19/eine-woman-with-the-sun-bekleidet/
++++
I currently try the / a creation story for my blog. Is really fun times to play the Creator.
Greetings from haschmech
I daresay I hereby declare that my hypothetical statement regarding the future which is more probable to be factually:
In 10 years, there will be no more Kissinger.
@ Klean
Perhaps there is by then new Kissinger.
@ Magnus Wolf Goeller
This is of course not rule out - as it were Kissinger's past work as personifying the future Hydra, however'm tempted to not to give him eternal life here this aspect.
Dear Mr. Goeller,
There will be ... no more Israel. = ... There will be no more Israel.
There will not be ... more Israel. = ... There will be no more Israel.
Is that way.
Best regards,
hr
@ H.Rannert
Maybe so, linguistically, as normally read, so.
Whether's it is so, we will see in ten years.
The key question of course is what Kissinger intended by this statement.
A timely exodus of those who understand?
Did he - what? - Confusion? (That should be succeeded. And he had to know that would be at least one episode of his statement.)
Israel could of course also be a state of the USA.
Where it would be practical to move the government from Washington to Jerusalem.
However, most New York Jews want there not out.
Maybe the guy wants (man I do not want to call him) is also based on the triggered with such a saying fears of some - and keep hopes of many people talking. For me it does matter who says something. In this case, I measure the saying no importance.
@ Info Liner
It may be that Kissinger has played only Alterseitelkeit. (I think, however, very unlikely.)
However, the statement did so precisely because of weight, because it comes from him.
(I would not have certainly made the quote on the subject, if Hans Meier released the spell.)
Anyway, you are far and wide the only one who noticed the interview. As I understand it, he means it, even as he said it. He said that is also even if ich's remember correctly, that Israel no place in a "new" (?) Will have the Middle East. With me so many question mark came up, I do not know what to do with it now.
@ Nietzsche
"With me so many question mark came up, I do not know actually what to do with it."
Just as it goes, especially in view of the developments in Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey etc. to me.
Alone, when I look at myself ... the delusion Erdogan (Wanted to write something already, but did not do so because here just so much going on.)
Lightly it can be at any rate not take it if it was this old Erzdrecksack just now let go of something.
(Did he surely: Otherwise, the New York Post would have had to have apologized in the most humble Kriechgange for her at least grossly negligent false reporting long.)
[...] You to still remembers the words of Henry Kissinger, ... "In 10 years, there will be no more [...]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C78ubb8E2RI